Qur'an, Hadith and Scholars:Stoning: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
[checked revision][checked revision]
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{QuranHadithScholarsIndex}}
{{QuranHadithScholarsIndex}}


The [[Qur'an]] does not in any place order that adulterers be stoned, rather their prescribed punishment is being whipped 100 times (24:2). The ulamaa', however, are unanimous in their opinion that the penalty for married men or women who commit adultery is to be stoned to death. This discrepancy is explained by the [[hadith]] as due to the loss of this verse in the Qur'an to a hungry goat which ate the page upon which it was preserved. In point of fact, the Islamic legal tradition largely took form in Iraq, where there was a very large, old and well established school of Jewish halacha or religious law. The prescribed punishment for adultery in the halachah is stoning to death (based on Deuteronomy 23:23-24 and extended by the rabbis to include all cases of adultery) and it is likely that Islamic scholars working in the 8th and 9th century in Iraq were influenced by Jewish law to include this more strict punishment, which was not practiced by the believers of Muhammad's time and the first century of his movement. The hadith about the goat eating the verse from the Qur'an, then, is likely a fabrication (as are the vast majority of hadith, which cannot be reliably traced in most cases to before the beginning of the 8th century) and an excuse to include this punishment in the [[shari'ah]] even though it is not found in the Qur'an. As if to underline the point, many of the hadith that record Muhammad ordering stoning include the detail that the men being stoned were Jewish. Whatever its origins, stoning to death as a punishment for married adulterers is today a well-established part of shari'ah and modern scholars to this day continue to advocate for its use.
The [[Qur'an]] does not in any place order that adulterers be stoned, rather their prescribed punishment is being whipped 100 times (24:2). The ulamaa', however, are unanimous in their opinion that the penalty for married men or women who commit adultery is to be stoned to death. This discrepancy is explained by the [[hadith]] as due to the loss of this verse in the Qur'an to a hungry goat which ate the page upon which it was preserved. In point of fact, the Islamic legal tradition largely took form in Iraq, where there was a very large, old and well established school of Jewish halacha or religious law. The prescribed punishment for adultery in the halachah is stoning to death (based on Deuteronomy 23:23-24 and extended by the rabbis to include all cases of adultery) and it is likely that Islamic scholars working in the 8th and 9th century in Iraq were influenced by Jewish law to include this more strict punishment, which was not practiced by the believers of Muhammad's time and the first century of his movement. The hadith about the goat eating the verse from the Qur'an, then, is likely a fabrication (as are the vast majority of hadith, which cannot be reliably traced in most cases to before the beginning of the 8th century) and an excuse to include this punishment in the [[shari'ah]] even though it is not found in the Qur'an. As if to underline the point, many of the hadith that record Muhammad ordering stoning include the detail that the men being stoned were Jewish. Whatever its origins, stoning to death as a punishment for married adulterers is today a well-established part of shari'ah and modern scholars to this day continue to advocate for its use. Most countries have signed the UN Convention Against Torture, though stoning appears in the legislation of a [[w:Stoning|small number of countries]] (though never utilised in some cases). Most notably, this includes Iran, where 150 people were stoned to death between 1980 and 2009, though rarely since, and is also known to occur in tribal areas of Afghanistan.<ref>[https://blogs.loc.gov/law/2021/04/falqs-execution-by-stoning-and-privacy-laws-related-to-sexual-crimes-in-iran-and-afghanistan/ FALQs: Execution by Stoning and Privacy Laws Related to Sexual Crimes in Iran and Afghanistan] - Kelly Buchannan, Library of Congress blogs, 30 April 2021</ref>


==Qur'an==
==Qur'an==
Line 185: Line 185:
===Shaykh Gibril Haddad===
===Shaykh Gibril Haddad===


{{Quote|[http://mac.abc.se/home/onesr/ez/in/it1/Abrogation_Hadith.txt Abrogation and Hadith]<BR>Shaykh Gibril Fouad Haddad, Living Islam, December 23, 2008|The late Shaykh `Abd Allah al-Ghumari in Dhawq al-Halawa fi Imtina` Naskh al-Tilawa and al-Ihsan fi Ta`qib al-Itqan, denied that "When the mature man and the mature woman commit adultery, stone them" was ever part of the Qur'an and asserted the report to that effect was disclaimed (munkar). However, '''it cannot be munkar since Imam Malik narrates it verbatim from our liegelord `Umar in the chapter on hadd in the Muwatta''''.<BR>. . .<BR>
{{Quote|[https://web.archive.org/web/20110105134214/http://mac.abc.se/home/onesr/ez/in/it1/Abrogation_Hadith.txt Abrogation and Hadith Shaykh Gibril Fouad Haddad, Living Islam, December 23, 2008]|The late Shaykh `Abd Allah al-Ghumari in Dhawq al-Halawa fi Imtina` Naskh al-Tilawa and al-Ihsan fi Ta`qib al-Itqan, denied that "When the mature man and the mature woman commit adultery, stone them" was ever part of the Qur'an and asserted the report to that effect was disclaimed (munkar). However, '''it cannot be munkar since Imam Malik narrates it verbatim from our liegelord `Umar in the chapter on hadd in the Muwatta''''.<BR>. . .<BR>
Yes, our liegelord `Umar radyAllahu `anhu reported that when it was revealed, the Prophet salla Allahu `alayhi wa-Sallam refrained from consigning it into writing, so it did not become mass-transmitted from him. (If it had, it would have been meaningless for `Umar to strenuously predict that innovators would one day emerge and deny that rajm was ever in the Qur'an.)
Yes, our liegelord `Umar radyAllahu `anhu reported that when it was revealed, the Prophet salla Allahu `alayhi wa-Sallam refrained from consigning it into writing, so it did not become mass-transmitted from him. (If it had, it would have been meaningless for `Umar to strenuously predict that innovators would one day emerge and deny that rajm was ever in the Qur'an.)


Line 226: Line 226:


{{Hub4|Adultery|Adultery}}
{{Hub4|Adultery|Adultery}}
=References=
{{reflist}}
[[Category:QHS]]
[[Category:QHS]]
[[Category:Honor violence]]
[[Category:Honor violence]]
Line 234: Line 238:
[[Category:Shariah (Islamic Law)]]
[[Category:Shariah (Islamic Law)]]
[[Category:Fiqh (legal theory)]]
[[Category:Fiqh (legal theory)]]
[[ar:القرآن_والحديث_والعلماء:_الرجم]]
Editors, em-bypass-2, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
2,743

edits