Scientific Miracles in the Quran: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
too philosphical
[checked revision][checked revision]
(too philosphical)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 248: Line 248:
* [[Fire Whirl Non-Miracle in the Quran]]
* [[Fire Whirl Non-Miracle in the Quran]]
* [[Fluorescence Miracle in the Quran]]
* [[Fluorescence Miracle in the Quran]]
* [[Freshwater In Mountains Miracle In The Quran]]
* [[Full Moon Miracle in the Quran]]
* [[Full Moon Miracle in the Quran]]
* [[Galaxy Filaments Not In The Quran]]
* [[Galaxy Filaments Not In The Quran]]
Line 306: Line 307:
External:
External:
* [https://www.answering-islam.org/authors/katz/haman/bucaille.html AnsweringIslam: The Haman Hoax]
* [https://www.answering-islam.org/authors/katz/haman/bucaille.html AnsweringIslam: The Haman Hoax]
==Debunking scientific miracles==
The fact that so many "scientific miracles" were debunked shows how deceptive the scientific miracle industry is. Islamic apologists will make up another miracle anytime science discovers something. And they are not able to predict a new scientific discovery. So their work gives zero additional value to humanity. They're just re-interpreting an old text, that already has its interpretations in the classical tafsirs that are based on the Islamic tradition. They don't investigate the Quran, they are trying to force a scientific interpretation upon the Quran in any possible way. They don't shy away from mistranslation, mis-interpretation, taking the verses out of context, mis-information about science and other manipulations. So is it even necessary to debunk every single miracle they come with, when their whole methodology is wrong?


==See also==
==See also==
Editors, em-bypass-2
4,744

edits

Navigation menu