Shaytan and angel word count in the Qur'an: Difference between revisions

[unchecked revision][unchecked revision]
Line 391: Line 391:
** In other word counts apologists excluded many words (words with suffixes, words with prefixes, dual and plural forms..), because they weren't "basic form" enough. But when all the occurrences have a nice number, then suddenly there is no need to count only the "basic form" and all words are counted. Also in the miracle "Righteous and wicked" the "righteous" had a double word count, because they are better. So why angels don't have a double word count over ''shaytans''? Shouldn't there be the same logic between righteous-wicked and angels-shaytans?
** In other word counts apologists excluded many words (words with suffixes, words with prefixes, dual and plural forms..), because they weren't "basic form" enough. But when all the occurrences have a nice number, then suddenly there is no need to count only the "basic form" and all words are counted. Also in the miracle "Righteous and wicked" the "righteous" had a double word count, because they are better. So why angels don't have a double word count over ''shaytans''? Shouldn't there be the same logic between righteous-wicked and angels-shaytans?
** Couldn't Allah make also the singular forms word count equal, so that we can be sure that this is not just a coincidence?
** Couldn't Allah make also the singular forms word count equal, so that we can be sure that this is not just a coincidence?
** Why believers-disbelievers and similar pairs don't have the same word count?
** Why believers-disbelievers and similar pairs don't have an equal word count?


==See also==
==See also==
Editors, em-bypass-2
4,744

edits