Template:Pictorial-Islam-options: Difference between revisions

From WikiIslam, the online resource on Islam
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[checked revision][checked revision]
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 235: Line 235:


<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Islamic Hijabs and Nun's Habits|2=[[File:Islamic Hijab and Nuns Habit.jpg|160px|link=Islamic Hijabs and Nuns Habits]]|3=Apologists often attempt to compare the Islamic observance of hijab with the wearing of the religious habit by Christian nuns. This comparison is fundamentally flawed and is one of many fallacious tu quoque arguments utilized in defense of Islam. In reality, there are numerous differences between the two items of clothing. For example, unlike the compulsory observance of hijab (in some form or another) for practicing Muslim women, practicing Christian women are not required or expected to wear a nun's habit. Naturally, only nuns are. In fact, it would be considered quite bizarre for a Christian women to wear a nun's habit is she were not a nun. The burka covers everything including the eyes, leaving women unrecognizable, visually impaired, and closed off to social interaction. The nun's habit does not cover the face at all, so they cause no such problems. Also, if a nun were to remove her head covering, unlike a Muslim woman, she would not run the risk of being intimidated, ostracized or honor killed by her co-religionists. For example, Aqsa Parvez was a 16-year-old Muslim girl who was honor-killed in Ontario, Canada. Her brother had strangled her to death when she refused to wear a hijab covering. ([[Islamic Hijabs and Nuns Habits|''read more'']])}}</option>
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Islamic Hijabs and Nun's Habits|2=[[File:Islamic Hijab and Nuns Habit.jpg|160px|link=Islamic Hijabs and Nuns Habits]]|3=Apologists often attempt to compare the Islamic observance of hijab with the wearing of the religious habit by Christian nuns. This comparison is fundamentally flawed and is one of many fallacious tu quoque arguments utilized in defense of Islam. In reality, there are numerous differences between the two items of clothing. For example, unlike the compulsory observance of hijab (in some form or another) for practicing Muslim women, practicing Christian women are not required or expected to wear a nun's habit. Naturally, only nuns are. In fact, it would be considered quite bizarre for a Christian women to wear a nun's habit is she were not a nun. The burka covers everything including the eyes, leaving women unrecognizable, visually impaired, and closed off to social interaction. The nun's habit does not cover the face at all, so they cause no such problems. Also, if a nun were to remove her head covering, unlike a Muslim woman, she would not run the risk of being intimidated, ostracized or honor killed by her co-religionists. For example, Aqsa Parvez was a 16-year-old Muslim girl who was honor-killed in Ontario, Canada. Her brother had strangled her to death when she refused to wear a hijab covering. ([[Islamic Hijabs and Nuns Habits|''read more'']])}}</option>
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Diseases and Cures in the Wings of Houseflies|2=[[File:Phage.jpg|200px|link=Diseases and Cures in the Wings of Houseflies]]|3=The thesis put forward by some Muslims is that it has recently been proven by modern science that flies carry not only pathogens but also the agents that limit these pathogens, thus proving the fly wing hadiths that tell us "If a fly falls into one of your containers [of food or drink], immerse it completely before removing it, for under one of its wings there is venom and under another there is its antidote." They principally identify these agents to be bacteriophages, though they also sometimes refer to fungi. The scientific evidence does not support the veracity of the fly wing hadiths for many reasons, including: (1) Bacteriophages are not limited to any specific wing of the fly. (2) Bacteriophages in the natural state and concentration are not antidotal to bacterial diseases, particularly for temperate or lysogenic phages. (3) Bacteriophages are ineffective against non-bacterial diseases carried by flies, meaning even if the wings were to provide you with an antidote to bacterial diseases, they could infect you with another non-bacterial disease (i.e. dipping a fly into your drink is not good advice). ([[Diseases and Cures in the Wings of Houseflies|''read more'']])}}</option>




</choose><!-- HELP NOTES: <option>{{Pictorial-Islam|1=TITLE OF STORY|2=IMAGE LINK (SEE ABOVE FOR EXAMPLE)|3=TEXT OF STORY - SHOULD INCLUDE READ MORE LINK}}</option> --><noinclude>[[Category:Templates]][[Category:Random Templates]]</noinclude>
</choose><!-- HELP NOTES: <option>{{Pictorial-Islam|1=TITLE OF STORY|2=IMAGE LINK (SEE ABOVE FOR EXAMPLE)|3=TEXT OF STORY - SHOULD INCLUDE READ MORE LINK}}</option> --><noinclude>[[Category:Templates]][[Category:Random Templates]]</noinclude>

Revision as of 13:24, 30 July 2013

Also see: Template:Pictorial-Islam

To You Your Religion and To Me Mine (Qur'an 109:1-6)
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination

This article analyzes the apologetic claim that Surat al-Kafiroon (the Disbelievers, Atheists) advocates religious tolerance and freedom. When read in context, like many other verses misinterpreted for apologetic purposes, Surat al-Kafiroon advocates the opposite of what is sometimes claimed. This surah is not a proclamation on religious tolerance and freedom or a recognition of religious pluralism. In fact, this surah unequivocally forbids inter-faith dialogue and advocates an "us versus them" mentality between Muslims and disbelievers. This is how the surah is understood by mainstream Islam and the majority of its classical and contemporary scholars. Furthermore, if the historical context were to be ignored, it would still remain an abrogated verse superseded by "the verses of fighting". (read more)

Retrieved from "http://wikiislamica.net/index.php?title=Template:Pictorial-Islam-options&oldid=94709"