WikiIslam:Discussions/Visitor Inquiries - Revision history

IbnPinker at 17:32, 26 February 2021

2021-02-26T17:32:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:32, 26 February 2021
Line 178:		Line 178:

	:Thanks for the suggestion (the wikiislam site itself was recently moved to https too). This has now been done. The relevant templates are all included on https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Category:Islamic_text_templates [[User:Lightyears\|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears\|talk]]) 16:23, 3 August 2018 (UTC)		:Thanks for the suggestion (the wikiislam site itself was recently moved to https too). This has now been done. The relevant templates are all included on https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Category:Islamic_text_templates [[User:Lightyears\|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears\|talk]]) 16:23, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

			[[Category:WikiIslam]]

IbnPinker at 18:38, 20 January 2021

2021-01-20T18:38:10Z

@@ Line 89: / Line 89: @@
 :If you look at the talk page for Wikipedia's Alhazen article[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alhazen#Misuse_of_sources], you'll see a lot of the claims are disputed because [http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Islam,_Science_and_the_Problems_at_Wikipedia Jagged 85] was a big contributor of the information there. We have our hub page concerning the "[http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Golden_Age Golden Age]", but other than that, we would suggest going to the [http://forum09.faithfreedom.org/ FFI forum] if you have any questions. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 11:04, 5 July 2013 (PDT)
-==Inspired by Muhammad: Dog Hadiths==
+==Dog Hadiths==
 Hello. I looked at the links to the Hadiths concerning killing dogs and restricting to killing black dogs from this page: http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Inspired_by_Muhammad#Killing_Dogs
@@ Line 143: / Line 143: @@
 ::C) Translations are most welcome. I'm assuming you read those pages I provided you a while ago, but if you need further help, you can ask Axius or I (if I'm around) for help. [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 13:46, 8 October 2014 (PDT)
 =="Jihad is Perpetual" subtopic has bad link==
@@ Line 172: / Line 154: @@
 :Indeed you are right, it is not there anymore. I have it in my local copy so yes it was removed from their website. Not sure what to do right now so I'm just going to add this to on our tasks page for now. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 14:04, 14 March 2015 (PDT)
 ==Question about Islamic Texts==
@@ Line 188: / Line 161: @@
 :As far as I know it hasnt been done. I think the problem is that there's no knowledge of what happened when, so there could be a lot of variation and no one could say that their version of events is right. Maybe if someone only used important events for which they definitely knew the dates they could try. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 17:12, 18 August 2015 (PDT)--[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 17:12, 18 August 2015 (PDT)
-==On the subject of Islam and Chess==
+==All links to verses @ usc.edu are dead==
 ALL LINKS TO VERSES @ usc.edu ARE DEAD. Either a new site must be found, or a possible solution might be to link to an archived version of the pages through one (or more) of the following:

IbnPinker at 18:20, 20 January 2021

2021-01-20T18:20:10Z

Show changes

IbnPinker at 17:52, 20 January 2021

2021-01-20T17:52:13Z

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 :That would be nice but there's only a few of us regular editors here and we dont have the time to chat or moderate chat. People are asked to go to forums on other websites. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] 21:05, 28 January 2011 (PST)
 ==Any interest in project to categorize the koran verses for sql database?==
@@ Line 44: / Line 38: @@
 ::Terrific idea. Should be done sometime. -Haqir
 ==Assisting more experienced article writers==

IbnPinker at 17:45, 20 January 2021

2021-01-20T17:45:41Z

Show changes

IbnPinker at 03:27, 6 December 2020

2020-12-06T03:27:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:27, 6 December 2020
Line 467:		Line 467:
	Has anybody ever combined the Qur'an, Hadith, and Ishaq/Tabari into a single, chronologically ordered document?		Has anybody ever combined the Qur'an, Hadith, and Ishaq/Tabari into a single, chronologically ordered document?
	: As far as I know it hasnt been done. I think the problem is that there's no knowledge of what happened when, so there could be a lot of variation and no one could say that their version of events is right. Maybe if someone only used important events for which they definitely knew the dates they could try. --[[User:Axius\|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius\|talk]] <nowiki>\|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius\|contribs]])</span> 17:12, 18 August 2015 (PDT)--[[User:Axius\|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius\|talk]] <nowiki>\|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius\|contribs]])</span> 17:12, 18 August 2015 (PDT)		: As far as I know it hasnt been done. I think the problem is that there's no knowledge of what happened when, so there could be a lot of variation and no one could say that their version of events is right. Maybe if someone only used important events for which they definitely knew the dates they could try. --[[User:Axius\|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius\|talk]] <nowiki>\|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius\|contribs]])</span> 17:12, 18 August 2015 (PDT)--[[User:Axius\|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius\|talk]] <nowiki>\|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius\|contribs]])</span> 17:12, 18 August 2015 (PDT)

	~~== What about more "responses to apologists" ? ==~~

	I am writing this as a confused muslim. You know,there are lots of islamic websites,they have thousands of "rebuttals to islamic critics" and just a few anti islamic ones against them.So when muslims come across an argument against islam, they think "well,im sure someone has already refutted this,so lets not worry about it." It seems like that "Critics of islam have all said what is to be said against islam,but apologists refutted them all,so there is nothing left to say." Probably that is what apologists think or try to prove.Considering these,I have a suggestion.I think you should have more "responses to apologists",so that we,as readers,can decide more reasonably which side is more plausible and you can be more "convincing" that way.Thank you.
	:I fully agree these sections are very important especially for often debated topics. See [https://wikiislam.net/wiki/WikiIslam:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Can_someone_do_XYZ.2C_create.2Fedit_an_article_for_me.3F this] about requests like this. [[User:Axius\|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius\|talk]] <nowiki>\|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius\|contribs]])</span> 18:30, 2 February 2016 (EST)

	== On the subject of Islam and Chess ==		== On the subject of Islam and Chess ==

Lightyears: /* Update QuranX.com links */

2018-08-03T16:25:15Z

Update QuranX.com links

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 3 August 2018
Line 502:		Line 502:

	Please update HTTP links to QuranX.com to HTTPS.		Please update HTTP links to QuranX.com to HTTPS.
			:Thanks for the suggestion (the wikiislam site itself was recently moved to https too). This has now been done. The relevant templates are all included on https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Category:Islamic_text_templates [[User:Lightyears\|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears\|talk]]) 16:23, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Alfred Russel: /* Update QuranX.com links */ new section

2018-08-02T21:59:37Z

Update QuranX.com links: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:59, 2 August 2018
Line 498:		Line 498:

	[[User:Yaakovaryeh\|Yaakovaryeh]] ([[User talk:Yaakovaryeh\|talk]]) 17:08, 18 October 2016 (EDT)		[[User:Yaakovaryeh\|Yaakovaryeh]] ([[User talk:Yaakovaryeh\|talk]]) 17:08, 18 October 2016 (EDT)

			== Update QuranX.com links ==

			Please update HTTP links to QuranX.com to HTTPS.

Yaakovaryeh at 21:08, 18 October 2016

2016-10-18T21:08:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, 18 October 2016
Line 496:		Line 496:

	http://'''archive.is'''/ [original URL]		http://'''archive.is'''/ [original URL]

			[[User:Yaakovaryeh\|Yaakovaryeh]] ([[User talk:Yaakovaryeh\|talk]]) 17:08, 18 October 2016 (EDT)

Yaakovaryeh at 20:42, 18 October 2016

2016-10-18T20:42:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:42, 18 October 2016
Line 486:		Line 486:
	I have to say, I read wikislam and get the overwhelming impression that, rather than a scholarly site meant to serve as a source of accurate info on Islam, that it is a polemic endeavor, a hostile, agenda-driven vehicle...not just in the various glaring innaccuracies, but in the general tone and often unscholarly asides.		I have to say, I read wikislam and get the overwhelming impression that, rather than a scholarly site meant to serve as a source of accurate info on Islam, that it is a polemic endeavor, a hostile, agenda-driven vehicle...not just in the various glaring innaccuracies, but in the general tone and often unscholarly asides.
	I am not a Muslim, but I consider it churlish to falsely represent a religion in a negative way. It's un-American. And most people would agree with me.		I am not a Muslim, but I consider it churlish to falsely represent a religion in a negative way. It's un-American. And most people would agree with me.

			== ALL LINKS TO VERSES @ usc.edu ARE DEAD ==

			ALL LINKS TO VERSES @ usc.edu ARE DEAD. Either a new site must be found, or a possible solution might be to link to an archived version of the pages through one (or more) of the following:

			http://'''webcache.googleusercontent.com'''/search?q=cache: [original URL]

			https://'''web.archive.org'''/web/*/ [original URL]

			http://'''archive.is'''/ [original URL]