WikiIslam:Writing Style Guide - Revision history

Asmith at 05:22, 31 December 2021

2021-12-31T05:22:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:22, 31 December 2021
Line 336:		Line 336:


	Overall, the tone should be encyclopedic and neutral. The facts should be presented "as is" with only as much commentary is needed to elucidate any given point or give relevant background information, and the tone of the writing should be that of an encyclopedia entry describing a fact about the world we live in, not a polemic trying to convince the reader of a given point or conversational banter with a familiar second party. Articles must adhere to the encyclopedia format and should address the topic at hand directly and neutrally; articles engaged in a particular argument (whether ~~states~~ explicitly or left implicit) and attempting to persuade the reader of one side will not be permitted. Speaking directly to the reader should be avoided if at all possible, and the use of the 1st person "we" should likewise be avoided if at all possible. Although the wiki covers some controversial topics the goal of its language should be to keep anyone reading as long as possible without causing any offense. This does NOT mean that the content of the article should "pull punches" or avoid controversial topics that might hurt the feelings of Muslims or any other group of people, however the word choice should not be such that a reasonable person from any given group might immediately stop reading due to the diction or word choice alone.		Overall, the tone should be encyclopedic and neutral. The facts should be presented "as is" with only as much commentary is needed to elucidate any given point or give relevant background information, and the tone of the writing should be that of an encyclopedia entry describing a fact about the world we live in, not a polemic trying to convince the reader of a given point or conversational banter with a familiar second party. Articles must adhere to the encyclopedia format and should address the topic at hand directly and neutrally; articles engaged in a particular argument (whether stated explicitly or left implicit) and attempting to persuade a reader (as opposed to neutrally assessing the argument on its merits) the reader of one side will not be permitted. Speaking directly to the reader should be avoided if at all possible, and the use of the 1st person "we" should likewise be avoided if at all possible. Although the wiki covers some controversial topics the goal of its language should be to keep anyone reading as long as possible without causing any offense. This does NOT mean that the content of the article should "pull punches" or avoid controversial topics that might hurt the feelings of Muslims or any other group of people, however the word choice should not be such that a reasonable person from any given group might immediately stop reading due to the diction or word choice alone.

	==Analysis==		==Analysis==
Line 418:		Line 418:
	\|}		\|}

	=== Modern views on traditional Islamic topics ===		===Modern views on traditional Islamic topics===
	Islam, as with any storied tradition, has and continues to change with the times. What a Muslim scholar wrote in a book in 10th century Baghdad is not going to perfectly reflect the beliefs and practices of Muslims living on the West Coast of the United States in the current year. The beliefs of both and in fact all other Muslims fall within the scope and purview of WikiIslam, and it is the wiki's job to document both.		Islam, as with any storied tradition, has and continues to change with the times. What a Muslim scholar wrote in a book in 10th century Baghdad is not going to perfectly reflect the beliefs and practices of Muslims living on the West Coast of the United States in the current year. The beliefs of both and in fact all other Muslims fall within the scope and purview of WikiIslam, and it is the wiki's job to document both.
	When it comes to the arguments of modern Islamic du'aah (preachers) and apologists however special care is needed. The wiki shall concern itself with documenting such arguments as reach a critical mass of recognition in the Muslim community at large, and will present them clearly and in an unbiased fashion. Where these arguments contradict obvious readings of the original texts, contradict published and accepted science, or generally err in regards to the facts these errors shall be enumerated and commented upon, but the wiki will not concern itself with making persuasive arguments as to the merits of these apologetic claims, one way or another. Likewise, when a commonly held modern view in the contemporary Muslim community contradicts a plain reading of the text or provable history, these discrepancies too shall be catalogued, but it is once again not the wiki's job to make a persuasive argument for or against such views. For more information on which apologetic claims can be included for discussion on the wiki, please see [[WikiIslam:Scope and Article Relevance]]. For more on how the analysis of these modern views should be incorporated into the article, please see [[WikiIslam:Structure]]		When it comes to the arguments of modern Islamic du'aah (preachers) and apologists however special care is needed. The wiki shall concern itself with documenting such arguments as reach a critical mass of recognition in the Muslim community at large, and will present them clearly and in an unbiased fashion. Where these arguments contradict obvious readings of the original texts, contradict published and accepted science, or generally err in regards to the facts these errors shall be enumerated and commented upon, but the wiki will not concern itself with making persuasive arguments as to the merits of these apologetic claims, one way or another. Likewise, when a commonly held modern view in the contemporary Muslim community contradicts a plain reading of the text or provable history, these discrepancies too shall be catalogued, but it is once again not the wiki's job to make a persuasive argument for or against such views. For more information on which apologetic claims can be included for discussion on the wiki, please see [[WikiIslam:Scope and Article Relevance]]. For more on how the analysis of these modern views should be incorporated into the article, please see [[WikiIslam:Structure]]

IbnPinker: /* See Also */

2021-08-25T13:09:16Z

See Also

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:09, 25 August 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[WikiIslam]]'s aim is to be the internet's most definitive, scholarly and neutral source for information of the religion of Islam. As such this page expands on the site's [[WikiIslam:Policies and Guidelines\|policies and guidelines]] concerning style, tone and content of its articles by providing a visual guide for editors. Its goal is both to provide practical guides to the editor on questions such as orthography as well as to facilitate the creation of articles which are neutral and encyclopedic in nature.		[[WikiIslam]]'s aim is to be the internet's most definitive, scholarly and neutral source for information of the religion of Islam. As such this page expands on the site's [[WikiIslam:Policies and Guidelines\|policies and guidelines]] concerning style, tone and content of its articles by providing a visual guide for editors. Its goal is both to provide practical guides to the editor on questions such as orthography as well as to facilitate the creation of articles which are neutral and encyclopedic in nature.

	==Standardized ~~Spellings~~==		==Standardized spellings==
	There are many acceptable phonetic spellings for different words that are translated or transliterated into English. However, WikiIslam editors should standardize spelling to use throughout the wiki. The following is a list of required spelling standardizations. Note: You should not standardize spelling in quotations, leave the quoted text as originally written. This table is subject to change to accommodate new words.		There are many acceptable phonetic spellings for different words that are translated or transliterated into English. However, WikiIslam editors should standardize spelling to use throughout the wiki. The following is a list of required spelling standardizations. Note: You should not standardize spelling in quotations, leave the quoted text as originally written. This table is subject to change to accommodate new words.
	~~<br />~~
	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|+Table of Standardized Spellings		\|+Table of Standardized Spellings
Line 419:		Line 418:
	\|}		\|}

			=== Modern views on traditional Islamic topics ===
	===Modern ~~Views of Traditional~~ Islamic ~~Topics~~===

	Islam, as with any storied tradition, has and continues to change with the times. What a Muslim scholar wrote in a book in 10th century Baghdad is not going to perfectly reflect the beliefs and practices of Muslims living on the West Coast of the United States in the current year. The beliefs of both and in fact all other Muslims fall within the scope and purview of WikiIslam, and it is the wiki's job to document both.		Islam, as with any storied tradition, has and continues to change with the times. What a Muslim scholar wrote in a book in 10th century Baghdad is not going to perfectly reflect the beliefs and practices of Muslims living on the West Coast of the United States in the current year. The beliefs of both and in fact all other Muslims fall within the scope and purview of WikiIslam, and it is the wiki's job to document both.
	When it comes to the arguments of modern Islamic du'aah (preachers) and apologists however special care is needed. The wiki shall concern itself with documenting such arguments as reach a critical mass of recognition in the Muslim community at large, and will present them clearly and in an unbiased fashion. Where these arguments contradict obvious readings of the original texts, contradict published and accepted science, or generally err in regards to the facts these errors shall be enumerated and commented upon, but the wiki will not concern itself with making persuasive arguments as to the merits of these apologetic claims, one way or another. Likewise, when a commonly held modern view in the contemporary Muslim community contradicts a plain reading of the text or provable history, these discrepancies too shall be catalogued, but it is once again not the wiki's job to make a persuasive argument for or against such views. For more information on which apologetic claims can be included for discussion on the wiki, please see [[WikiIslam:Scope and Article Relevance]]. For more on how the analysis of these modern views should be incorporated into the article, please see [[WikiIslam:Structure]]		When it comes to the arguments of modern Islamic du'aah (preachers) and apologists however special care is needed. The wiki shall concern itself with documenting such arguments as reach a critical mass of recognition in the Muslim community at large, and will present them clearly and in an unbiased fashion. Where these arguments contradict obvious readings of the original texts, contradict published and accepted science, or generally err in regards to the facts these errors shall be enumerated and commented upon, but the wiki will not concern itself with making persuasive arguments as to the merits of these apologetic claims, one way or another. Likewise, when a commonly held modern view in the contemporary Muslim community contradicts a plain reading of the text or provable history, these discrepancies too shall be catalogued, but it is once again not the wiki's job to make a persuasive argument for or against such views. For more information on which apologetic claims can be included for discussion on the wiki, please see [[WikiIslam:Scope and Article Relevance]]. For more on how the analysis of these modern views should be incorporated into the article, please see [[WikiIslam:Structure]]

	==Lead vs ~~Body~~==		==Lead vs. body==

	===Lead===		===Lead===
Line 458:		Line 455:
	===SAW, SWT, He, Him or Her===		===SAW, SWT, He, Him or Her===
	WikiIslam aims to be an objective platform, therefore additional religious honorifics such as "Muhammad (saw)" or "Allah (swt)" are not permitted in articles, unless quoting from a text which has them. The same applies to using an uppercase "H" in words such as "he", "him" or "her" in reference to deities of any religion. An exception to this rule would be the talk pages where users are free to use whatever form they feel comfortable with.		WikiIslam aims to be an objective platform, therefore additional religious honorifics such as "Muhammad (saw)" or "Allah (swt)" are not permitted in articles, unless quoting from a text which has them. The same applies to using an uppercase "H" in words such as "he", "him" or "her" in reference to deities of any religion. An exception to this rule would be the talk pages where users are free to use whatever form they feel comfortable with.
	==See ~~Also~~==		==See also==

	*[[WikiIslam:Arguments Not To Use]]
	*[[WikiIslam:Policies and Guidelines]]		*[[WikiIslam:Policies and Guidelines]]

	==External ~~Links~~==		==External links==

	*{{external link\| url = http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/wc063\| title = Guidelines for Effective Professional and Academic Writing\| publisher = University of Florida\| author = \| date = Reviewed January 2013\| archiveurl = http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fedis.ifas.ufl.edu%2Fwc063&date=2014-01-18\| deadurl = no}}		*{{external link\| url = http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/wc063\| title = Guidelines for Effective Professional and Academic Writing\| publisher = University of Florida\| author = \| date = Reviewed January 2013\| archiveurl = http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fedis.ifas.ufl.edu%2Fwc063&date=2014-01-18\| deadurl = no}}

	[[Category:Policies and Guidelines]]		[[Category:Policies and Guidelines]]

IbnPinker at 13:08, 25 August 2021

2021-08-25T13:08:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:08, 25 August 2021
Line 14:		Line 14:
	\|God of the Quran		\|God of the Quran
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''~~Qur'an~~'''		\|'''Quran'''
	\|Yes		\|Yes
	\|Central religious text (Holy book) of Islam		\|Central religious text (Holy book) of Islam

Asmith: /* Analysis */

2020-11-23T08:46:52Z

Analysis

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:46, 23 November 2020
Line 418:		Line 418:
	\|An editor's own conclusions or exaggerations are being replaced with facts.		\|An editor's own conclusions or exaggerations are being replaced with facts.
	\|}		\|}


			===Modern Views of Traditional Islamic Topics===

			Islam, as with any storied tradition, has and continues to change with the times. What a Muslim scholar wrote in a book in 10th century Baghdad is not going to perfectly reflect the beliefs and practices of Muslims living on the West Coast of the United States in the current year. The beliefs of both and in fact all other Muslims fall within the scope and purview of WikiIslam, and it is the wiki's job to document both.
			When it comes to the arguments of modern Islamic du'aah (preachers) and apologists however special care is needed. The wiki shall concern itself with documenting such arguments as reach a critical mass of recognition in the Muslim community at large, and will present them clearly and in an unbiased fashion. Where these arguments contradict obvious readings of the original texts, contradict published and accepted science, or generally err in regards to the facts these errors shall be enumerated and commented upon, but the wiki will not concern itself with making persuasive arguments as to the merits of these apologetic claims, one way or another. Likewise, when a commonly held modern view in the contemporary Muslim community contradicts a plain reading of the text or provable history, these discrepancies too shall be catalogued, but it is once again not the wiki's job to make a persuasive argument for or against such views. For more information on which apologetic claims can be included for discussion on the wiki, please see [[WikiIslam:Scope and Article Relevance]]. For more on how the analysis of these modern views should be incorporated into the article, please see [[WikiIslam:Structure]]

	==Lead vs Body==		==Lead vs Body==

Asmith: /* Modern Views of Traditional Islamic Topics */

2020-11-23T08:42:26Z

Modern Views of Traditional Islamic Topics

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:42, 23 November 2020
Line 432:		Line 432:

	Where a source is open to interpretation or is disputed, editors should not assume a particular meaning. Interpretations can be discussed by reference to scholars. The editor should only seek to summarize and collect sources that accurately reflect the positions and dialogue concerning the article’s subject. Articles should ''never'' end with an evaluation of the editor’s impression, as this constitutes original research. They should, however, summarize the conclusions of the scholarly works and the plain readings of the primary sources cited.		Where a source is open to interpretation or is disputed, editors should not assume a particular meaning. Interpretations can be discussed by reference to scholars. The editor should only seek to summarize and collect sources that accurately reflect the positions and dialogue concerning the article’s subject. Articles should ''never'' end with an evaluation of the editor’s impression, as this constitutes original research. They should, however, summarize the conclusions of the scholarly works and the plain readings of the primary sources cited.

	~~==Modern Views of Traditional Islamic Topics==~~

	Islam, as any great tradition, has and continues to change with the times. What a Muslim scholar wrote in a book in 10th century Baghdad is not going to perfectly reflect the beliefs and practices of Muslims living on the West Coast of the United States in the current year. The beliefs of both and in fact all other Muslims fall within the scope and purview of WikiIslam, and it is the wiki's job to document both. When it comes to the arguments of modern Islamic du'aah (preachers) and apologists however special care is needed. The wiki shall concern itself with documenting such arguments as reach a critical mass of recognition in the Muslim community at large, and will present them clearly and in an unbiased fashion. Where these arguments contradict obvious readings of the original texts, contradict published and accepted science, or generally err in regards to the facts these errors shall be enumerated and commented upon, but the wiki will not concern itself with making persuasive arguments as to the merits of these apologetic claims, one way or another. Likewise, when a commonly held modern view in the contemporary Muslim community contradicts a plain reading of the text or provable history, these discrepancies too shall be catalogued, but it is once again not the wiki's job to make a persuasive argument for or against such views. For more information on which apologetic claims can be included for discussion on the wiki, please see [[WikiIslam:Scope and Article Relevance]].

	==Transliteration==		==Transliteration==

Asmith: /* Title */

2020-11-23T08:29:30Z

Title

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:29, 23 November 2020
Line 441:		Line 441:

	===Title===		===Title===
	For titles of transliterated words use the standardized transliteration as the title with the English translation in brackets next to it. Example: Jannah (Heaven)		For titles of transliterated words use the standardized transliteration as the title with the English translation in brackets next to it. Example: Jannah (Heaven) For more info, please see [[WikiIslam:Titles]]

	===Article===		===Article===

IbnPinker at 23:14, 20 November 2020

2020-11-20T23:14:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:14, 20 November 2020
Line 142:		Line 142:
	\|Heaven		\|Heaven
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''~~Jahanam~~'''		\|'''Jahannam'''
	\|No		\|No
	\|Hell		\|Hell
Line 170:		Line 170:
	\|Lesser holy pilgrimage in Islam		\|Lesser holy pilgrimage in Islam
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''~~Kaaba~~'''		\|'''Ka'bah'''
	\|Yes		\|Yes
	\|Building at the center of Masjid al-Haram in Mecca. Direction of Muslim prayers and destination of pilgrimage		\|Building at the center of Masjid al-Haram in Mecca. Direction of Muslim prayers and destination of pilgrimage
Line 178:		Line 178:
	\|Circumcision		\|Circumcision
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''~~Najis~~'''		\|'''Najs'''
	\|No		\|No
	\|Ritually unclean or impure physically or spiritually		\|Ritually unclean or impure physically or spiritually
Line 206:		Line 206:
	\|Non-Mutawatir hadith, usually narrated by one narrator		\|Non-Mutawatir hadith, usually narrated by one narrator
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''~~Sharia~~'''		\|'''Shari'ah'''
	\|No		\|No
	\|Islamic canonical law based on Islamic scriptures		\|Islamic canonical law based on Islamic scriptures
Line 286:		Line 286:
	\|Obligatory charity based on % wealth		\|Obligatory charity based on % wealth
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''~~Dawah~~'''		\|'''Da'wah'''
	\|No		\|No
	\|Islamic proselytizing		\|Islamic proselytizing

IbnPinker at 22:35, 20 November 2020

2020-11-20T22:35:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:35, 20 November 2020
Line 14:		Line 14:
	\|God of the Quran		\|God of the Quran
	\|-		\|-
	\|'''~~Quran~~'''		\|'''Qur'an'''
	\|Yes		\|Yes
	\|Central religious text (Holy book) of Islam		\|Central religious text (Holy book) of Islam

Asmith: /* Modern Views of Traditional Islamic Topics */

2020-11-20T22:00:27Z

Modern Views of Traditional Islamic Topics

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 20 November 2020
Line 435:		Line 435:
	==Modern Views of Traditional Islamic Topics==		==Modern Views of Traditional Islamic Topics==

	Islam, as any great tradition, has and continues to change with the times. What a Muslim scholar wrote in a book in 10th century Baghdad is not going to perfectly reflect the beliefs and practices of Muslims living on the West Coast of the United States in the current year. The beliefs of both and in fact all other Muslims fall within the scope and purview of WikiIslam, and it is the wiki's job to document both. When it comes to the arguments of modern Islamic du'aah (preachers) and apologists however special care is needed. The wiki shall concern itself with documenting such arguments as reach a critical mass of recognition in the Muslim community at large, and will present them clearly and in an unbiased fashion. Where these arguments contradict obvious readings of the original texts, contradict published and accepted science, or generally err in regards to the facts these errors shall be enumerated and commented upon, but the wiki will not concern itself with making persuasive arguments as to the merits of these apologetic claims, one way or another. Likewise, when a commonly held modern view in the contemporary Muslim community contradicts a plain reading of the text or provable history, these discrepancies too shall be catalogued, but it is once again not the wiki's job to make a persuasive argument for or against such views. For more information on which apologetic claims can be included for discussion on the wiki, please see [[Scope and Article Relevance]].		Islam, as any great tradition, has and continues to change with the times. What a Muslim scholar wrote in a book in 10th century Baghdad is not going to perfectly reflect the beliefs and practices of Muslims living on the West Coast of the United States in the current year. The beliefs of both and in fact all other Muslims fall within the scope and purview of WikiIslam, and it is the wiki's job to document both. When it comes to the arguments of modern Islamic du'aah (preachers) and apologists however special care is needed. The wiki shall concern itself with documenting such arguments as reach a critical mass of recognition in the Muslim community at large, and will present them clearly and in an unbiased fashion. Where these arguments contradict obvious readings of the original texts, contradict published and accepted science, or generally err in regards to the facts these errors shall be enumerated and commented upon, but the wiki will not concern itself with making persuasive arguments as to the merits of these apologetic claims, one way or another. Likewise, when a commonly held modern view in the contemporary Muslim community contradicts a plain reading of the text or provable history, these discrepancies too shall be catalogued, but it is once again not the wiki's job to make a persuasive argument for or against such views. For more information on which apologetic claims can be included for discussion on the wiki, please see [[WikiIslam:Scope and Article Relevance]].

	==Transliteration==		==Transliteration==

Asmith: /* Lead vs Body */

2020-11-20T21:58:57Z

Lead vs Body

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:58, 20 November 2020
Line 431:		Line 431:
	The body text should go into greater detail than the Lead text. It is important that all challengeable materials, or any claim that is subject to dispute, are from third party published works. The body should go into further details of interest on the subject and be broken down into sections.		The body text should go into greater detail than the Lead text. It is important that all challengeable materials, or any claim that is subject to dispute, are from third party published works. The body should go into further details of interest on the subject and be broken down into sections.

	Where a source is open to interpretation or is disputed, editors should not assume a particular meaning. Interpretations can be discussed by reference to scholars. The editor should only seek to summarize and collect sources that accurately reflect the positions and dialogue concerning the article’s subject. Articles should ''never'' end with an evaluation of the editor’s impression, as this constitutes original research. They should, however, summarize the conclusions of the scholarly works and the plain readings of the primary sources cited.		Where a source is open to interpretation or is disputed, editors should not assume a particular meaning. Interpretations can be discussed by reference to scholars. The editor should only seek to summarize and collect sources that accurately reflect the positions and dialogue concerning the article’s subject. Articles should ''never'' end with an evaluation of the editor’s impression, as this constitutes original research. They should, however, summarize the conclusions of the scholarly works and the plain readings of the primary sources cited.

			==Modern Views of Traditional Islamic Topics==

			Islam, as any great tradition, has and continues to change with the times. What a Muslim scholar wrote in a book in 10th century Baghdad is not going to perfectly reflect the beliefs and practices of Muslims living on the West Coast of the United States in the current year. The beliefs of both and in fact all other Muslims fall within the scope and purview of WikiIslam, and it is the wiki's job to document both. When it comes to the arguments of modern Islamic du'aah (preachers) and apologists however special care is needed. The wiki shall concern itself with documenting such arguments as reach a critical mass of recognition in the Muslim community at large, and will present them clearly and in an unbiased fashion. Where these arguments contradict obvious readings of the original texts, contradict published and accepted science, or generally err in regards to the facts these errors shall be enumerated and commented upon, but the wiki will not concern itself with making persuasive arguments as to the merits of these apologetic claims, one way or another. Likewise, when a commonly held modern view in the contemporary Muslim community contradicts a plain reading of the text or provable history, these discrepancies too shall be catalogued, but it is once again not the wiki's job to make a persuasive argument for or against such views. For more information on which apologetic claims can be included for discussion on the wiki, please see [[Scope and Article Relevance]].

	==Transliteration==		==Transliteration==