WikiIslam talk:Sandbox/Diversity in Islam: Difference between revisions
(→Swap) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
swapping columns and rows is still a solution. Besides I would prefer one big table to prove the conclusion instead of many small tables, if they are going to remain incomplete. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 11:33, 11 April 2017 (EDT) | swapping columns and rows is still a solution. Besides I would prefer one big table to prove the conclusion instead of many small tables, if they are going to remain incomplete. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 11:33, 11 April 2017 (EDT) | ||
:[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanbali#Distinct_rulings This] is just one example where you can clearly see the differences between Sunni madhabs are about very unimportant things. If somehow we can include this here..... [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 11:54, 11 April 2017 (EDT) | :[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanbali#Distinct_rulings This] is just one example where you can clearly see the differences between Sunni madhabs are about very unimportant things. If somehow we can include this here..... [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 11:54, 11 April 2017 (EDT) | ||
::It would be too wide anyway. And also it wouldn't be sortable. Also I think we should list only the controversial topics. --[[User:Prekladator|Prekladator]] ([[User talk:Prekladator|talk]]) 12:23, 11 April 2017 (EDT) | |||
==Ticks and Crosses== | ==Ticks and Crosses== | ||
green tick and blue cross may look better than Yes and No in the table. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 16:32, 1 April 2017 (EDT) | green tick and blue cross may look better than Yes and No in the table. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 16:32, 1 April 2017 (EDT) | ||
:: Yes, but two things: Sometimes the answer might get more complicated than yes/no and a textual answer would not fit with those pictures in other cells. (Although I think the answers should be as simple as possible and if they were only two types of answer it would be good). And second, I am not sure if the column would still be sortable. --[[User:Prekladator|Prekladator]] ([[User talk:Prekladator|talk]]) 19:34, 1 April 2017 (EDT) | :: Yes, but two things: Sometimes the answer might get more complicated than yes/no and a textual answer would not fit with those pictures in other cells. (Although I think the answers should be as simple as possible and if they were only two types of answer it would be good). And second, I am not sure if the column would still be sortable. --[[User:Prekladator|Prekladator]] ([[User talk:Prekladator|talk]]) 19:34, 1 April 2017 (EDT) | ||
== We need help == | |||
We need someone who can get the Arabic sources. But as I understand it, the Protected Mode is constantly turned on, so nobody can register and edit. So he would have to do it via me. And that's very unpractical.. WikiIslam is not wiki anymore. It's just a few chosen ones who registered before it was forbidden. --[[User:Prekladator|Prekladator]] ([[User talk:Prekladator|talk]]) 12:32, 11 April 2017 (EDT) | |||
I mailed them but I don't get any response. If you can give the Arabic links, I can try and put them together. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 16:04, 11 April 2017 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:04, 11 April 2017
Columns and Rows
So there are some issues with the columns. We may not find detailed sources for every sect and subsect. Or we may not get their opinions on every topic like homosexuals, rape, jihad, stoning, slavery, witchcraft etc. But its good if we do get them.
I think the 4 Sunni schools and jafari shias cover most of the worlds Muslims. If we get their sources, it will mean 99% of this article's aim is achieved. Jafaris have too many branches it will take too long and too much efforts to do research if we start putting every branch of Jafaris and then look for their sources. But this is a great start. Saggy (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2017 (EDT)
Swap
swapping columns and rows is still a solution. Besides I would prefer one big table to prove the conclusion instead of many small tables, if they are going to remain incomplete. Saggy (talk) 11:33, 11 April 2017 (EDT)
- This is just one example where you can clearly see the differences between Sunni madhabs are about very unimportant things. If somehow we can include this here..... Saggy (talk) 11:54, 11 April 2017 (EDT)
- It would be too wide anyway. And also it wouldn't be sortable. Also I think we should list only the controversial topics. --Prekladator (talk) 12:23, 11 April 2017 (EDT)
Ticks and Crosses
green tick and blue cross may look better than Yes and No in the table. Saggy (talk) 16:32, 1 April 2017 (EDT)
- Yes, but two things: Sometimes the answer might get more complicated than yes/no and a textual answer would not fit with those pictures in other cells. (Although I think the answers should be as simple as possible and if they were only two types of answer it would be good). And second, I am not sure if the column would still be sortable. --Prekladator (talk) 19:34, 1 April 2017 (EDT)
We need help
We need someone who can get the Arabic sources. But as I understand it, the Protected Mode is constantly turned on, so nobody can register and edit. So he would have to do it via me. And that's very unpractical.. WikiIslam is not wiki anymore. It's just a few chosen ones who registered before it was forbidden. --Prekladator (talk) 12:32, 11 April 2017 (EDT) I mailed them but I don't get any response. If you can give the Arabic links, I can try and put them together. Saggy (talk) 16:04, 11 April 2017 (EDT)