User:Lehrasap/Sandbox 1: Difference between revisions

Khul' خلع (i.e. getting freedom from husband)

Talaq (divorce) is the right of only men in Islam. If he dislikes the wife, then he could divorce her without any reason. But if a woman dislikes her husband, then she could not divorce her. Thus Islam is criticised for being 'unjust' towards the women.

But Islam advocates claim that Islam is not 'unjust' to the women, and a woman could also get her freedom from her husband 'through the court', and it is known as Khul' (خلع).

Nevertheless, Islam critics point out that Khul' is in many ways an injustice towards the women, and it is not the counter part of husband's right of giving direct Talaq, while:

• Khul' is not the 'right' of a woman, but it is still the 'right' of husband to either grant it or to deny it.
• And no Islamic Curt could compel the husband to divorce her if he doesn't want to divorce her.
• In Khul', a woman has to offer the 'ransom money' to her husband for her freedom.
• If he accepts the ransom money offer, then he could divorce the wife and she gets her freedom. But if he rejects the money offer, then she should stay with him, and no court could compel him to divorce her.
• Even if the husband is abusive, and he beats her brutally (even with bruises on her body), still she could not get her freedom through Khul'.
• Only in case if husband breaks any part of her body (like bones), then she gets the right to go to the court, and get her freedom. But she still has to pay the 'ransom money' to her husband, even in case if he broke her body part.

Moreover, Khul' is often mixed up with the 'Faskh' (فسخ) of Nikah, although both of them are two different things.

In 'Faskh':

• A women gets the right to go to the court, and get her freedom 'without paying' any 'ransom money'.
• But Faskh could take place only in few special cases (like impotency, or if he doesn't pay her the maintenance money, or if he has became insane, or if his whereabouts are not knows).
• Nevertheless, Islam critics point out that Islamic Faskh is also an injustice towards the woman, while even in the above mentioned special cases, Islam still compels her to wait for several years to get her freedom and she suffers unilaterally.

Quranic Verse about the Khul'

If the husband is abusive and beats her brutally (even with bruises), still she has no right to get her freedom

Islam critics point out that following tradition, which shows that even brutal beating (even with bruises) is not enough that she could get her freedom through Khul' or through any Islamic court.

Therefore, this tradition tells:

1. This woman was extremely unsatisfied with her husband, and didn’t love him, and wanted to get rid of him.
2. Since Khul’ is not the right of woman in Islam, but depends only upon the will of man, that is why she was unable to get rid of him despite having a strong desire for her freedom.
3. And this 2nd husband used to beat her brutally till she got bruises all over her body. But despite this beating, he didn’t give her divorce or freedom through Khul’.
4. And Muhammad didn’t prohibit that man from beating her, but made it a part of Islamic Sharia by keeping quiet upon it (known as Hadith-e-Taqriri).
5. And Muhammad also didn’t give the right to the woman to take her freedom through Khul’ after such beating.

Even if husband breaks any part of the wife, still she has to pay the ransom money for her freedom

Critics of islam point out:

• She could not get the right to have divorce automatically, even if he beats her so brutally that any part of her body breaks (like bones etc.), but she still has to pay the ransom money to get rid of such abusive husband.
• As compared to Islam, in the Western world, she will not only get the right to have divorce automatically from such an abusive husband, but she will also get the compensation money from the husband for the injury.

A woman could not get her freedom through Khul’ even if the man is infertile:

All 4 Sunni Fiqh Imams agree that the wife could not take divorce if the man is infertile.

On the other hand, if woman is infertile, then according to Islam, he could right away divorce her as Umar Ibn Khattab divorced his wife for this fault^[1]

Women who seek their freedom through Khul’ are hypocrites & will not enter the paradise

If a woman does not simply like her husband, and seeks to get her freedom by using the ransom money, then such a women was declared to be a hypocrite.

Islam critics point out that as compared to the woman, if a husband divorces his wife while he dislikes her or without any harm, then he will not become a hypocrite, and he will not get a problem in entering the paradise for this same action.

Muslim women should ask these questions from themselves:

If you are a Muslim woman, then please ask this question from yourself:

• If you were there in place of Allah, and you had to make the laws, would you have made such a law like Khul’ for the women?
• Do you really consider that such an “Unjust” law like Khul’ could be made by the divine owner of Wisdom?
• Do you accept this blame that only women are emotional, and thus unable to decide themselves for their lives?
• Do you find it fair that even in case of differences and disputes, and despite having a strong desire to separate, still it is the husband who will decide for you if divorce is good for you or not?
• Don’t you realise that this thing which is called “Allah”, does not give the right of freedom to you while he thinks that woman is a creature with “lower Intelligence Level” as compared to the man?
• Don’t you feel that these unjust laws like Khul’ are not made by any Divine God in heaven, but a MAN is present behind these laws, whose thinking is that women are of lower status than men, and she should always obey the men?

Your human rationale and humanity in you is enough to guide you and you could yourself easily differentiate between the right & wrong.

A Response from a Muslim woman: I never heard about the ransom money

A Muslim woman wrote:

First time I am hearing that a wife needs to pay ransom money in Khul'. If Im not mistaken a woman does not need to pay back the dowry. Also, they can ask for divorce through the court if the husband abuse her (mentally or physically), fail to give nafkah etc.

Answer:

Problem is the Deceptions of Muslims, where they MIX one thing with another and keep thus hide the real face of Islam.

For example:

• If a man is impotent and unable to penetrate, then woman take take divorce through the court. But if the man is infertile, and could not give children to the women, then in this case women are NOT allowed to get their freedom through divorce in the courts, and to marry other man in order to get the children.
• And Muslims also tell that women are also allowed to take divorce, if man is not providing them with their maintenance money. Although this statement by Muslims is true, but still it is not the "complete" truth. Complete truth is this that woman has to wait 2 years if he is not providing her with the maintenance money. And only after this period (i.e. 2 years), Islamic courts will let the women to take divorce.
• And in case that: * Man is ugly. * Woman does not love him due to his bad habits. * Or man is abusive and beats her brutally. If woman wishes to get her freedom from him, then she simply cannot do it in Islam. Yes, one possible way is to use the greed of her abusive husband, and offer her the dower (bridal gift) back, or even more than this (according to the demand of the abusive husband). But still the final decision of her freedom lies in the hands of the husband. He could accept her offer and set her free, or he could reject the offer, and in this case all doors are closed upon her to get her freedom. Not even the Islamic courts could provide her freedom from her abusive husband in this case.

Difference between the "Islamic Laws" and the "Laws of Muslim Countries"

Please note this difference carefully, while again Muslims try to deceive innocent people by mixing these two things.

Real Islamic Rulings have been described above (i.e. Khul' is not the right of woman, but it depends upon the will of husband to grant her freedom or not).

During last 14 centuries of Islamic history, this Islamic Ruling stayed the same.

But in this century, thanks to the Western Feminist Movement, even women in the Islamic countries are becoming aware of their rights as humans.

Thus, these feminist movements in the Muslim countries fought against this Divorce/Khul' ruling of Islam, and to surprise, they also succeeded in many Muslim countries in "CHANGING" this actual Islamic ruling.

Now in many Muslim countries, indeed woman could go to the court, and ask for the Khul' (without paying the ransom money).

Actually, Islamic Scholars initially tried to stop this change, but this Islamic Ruling was so much against the Humanity, that they failed to achieve success in it.

It is same like Muslim men didn't need the permission of first wife to marry another wife, but due to the strong opposition from the feminist movement in the Muslim countries in this century, now Muslim men have to ask the written permission of the first wife before taking another woman as a wife.

For example, please read the following 2 Studies about how Courts were given the right to give freedom in Khul' without paying the ransom money, while Islamic Scholars opposed it, while according to Sharia it is the right of husband, and not the courts.

Study 1

Study 2

Moreover, if you want to know the Real Islamic Rulings, when a woman is allowed to take divorce from her husband, then you could look it here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissolution_of_Muslim_Marriages_Act,_1939

2. Grounds for decree for dissolution of marriage.

A woman married under Muslim Law shall be entitled to obtain a decree for the dissolution of her marriage on any one or more of the following grounds, namely:

(i) That the whereabouts of the husband have not been known for a period of 1[one] years;

(ii) That the husband has neglected or has filed to provide for her maintenance for a period of two years;

(ii-A) That the husband has taken an additional wife in contravention of the provisions of the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961;

(iii) That the husband has been sentenced to imprisonment for a period of 2[three] years or upwards;

(iv) That the husband has failed to perform, without reasonable cause, his marital obligations for a period of 3[one] years;

(v) That the husband was impotent at the time of the marriage and continues to be so;

(vi) That the husband has been insane for a period of two years or is suffering from leprosy or a virulent venereal disease;

(vii) That she, having been given in marriage by her father or other guardian before she attained the age of sixteen years, repudiated the marriage before attaining the age of eighteen years:

All these conditions upon a woman was a great burden and injustice. That is why even Muslim countries were compelled to abandon this Islamic Ruling, and allow the woman to take Khul' immediately in the Courts without paying the ransom money.

References