Talk:Sirat Rasul Allah: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
- Ezechiel77 | - Ezechiel77 | ||
:Sorry currently there's no one available to follow up on this. You could ask on forums for those sources. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 02:37, 26 September 2015 (PDT) | :Sorry currently there's no one available to follow up on this. You could ask on forums for those sources. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 02:37, 26 September 2015 (PDT) | ||
[[User:TheFreeKafir]] I accepted your edits. As for the final anecdotal claim, I removed it. I am looking into whether we can introduce the "citation needed" template to the wiki that is commonly used on wikipedia to tag unreferenced claims that editors suspect to be true. As for now, however, since we don't have that template, I just deleted the sentence. Generally speaking, there should be no reason for us to keep text in an article that needs to be crossed out. --[[User:IbnPinker|IbnPinker]] ([[User talk:IbnPinker|talk]]) 21:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:37, 26 November 2020
Hi, would it be possible to have mor sources concerning islamic scholars view of ibn ishaq's work ? It seems really important mainly to provide a source for the claim that ibn ishaq is accepted among scholars (past and present ?) and also because ibn ishaq, if true, tells a lot about Muhammad's lifestyle let's say..
I read some stuff regarding muslims' view on ibn ishaq and some pages give a lot of sources that undermine the credibility of ibn ishaq.
To sump up, could you make a better page regarding ibn ishaq ?
Thank you.
- Ezechiel77
- Sorry currently there's no one available to follow up on this. You could ask on forums for those sources. --Axius (talk | contribs) 02:37, 26 September 2015 (PDT)
User:TheFreeKafir I accepted your edits. As for the final anecdotal claim, I removed it. I am looking into whether we can introduce the "citation needed" template to the wiki that is commonly used on wikipedia to tag unreferenced claims that editors suspect to be true. As for now, however, since we don't have that template, I just deleted the sentence. Generally speaking, there should be no reason for us to keep text in an article that needs to be crossed out. --IbnPinker (talk) 21:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)