Creation of Humans from Clay: Difference between revisions

Creation of Humans from Clay (view source)

146 bytes removed , 8 February 2014

m

[checked revision]

48,466

edits

@@ Line 166: / Line 166: @@
 ==Conclusion==
-It is apparent that folkloric tales about the creation of humans from clay/earth/mud is very common. So, does the modern scientific hypothesis of the role of clay in abiogenesis prove the validity of the religions of the ancient Mesopotamians, the ancient Egyptians, the African peoples of Silluk and Pangwe, the Amerindians, the Karens of Burma, or the Incas?
+This is not a "scientific miracle of the Qur'an" because it is apparent that folkloric tales about the creation of humans from clay/earth/mud is very common throughout the world, and many of these tales pre-date the existence of Islam.
-Is Khnum the true god? Or Nammu, Viracocha, Juok, Chinigchinich or Pund-jel? Why do Muslims believe [[Allah]] to be the true god as 'suggested' by the clay abiogenesis hypothesis? It could well be the ram-headed Elephantine god Khnum who really did create human beings from clay.
+It is also scientifically inaccurate because the Islamic faith claims that human beings were created ''from'' clay, contrary to the scientific hypothesis that clay merely 'match-makes' RNA and membrane vesicles - and therefore does not form a building block.
 {{Core Science}}