Autochecked users, Bureaucrats, Editors, oversight, recentchangescleanup, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
19,746
edits
User talk:Saggy: Difference between revisions
→Scientific errors - response blog
| Line 278: | Line 278: | ||
:::: No this is good. And I commend you for going through the articles and rewriting them.-- [[User:ThatMuslimGuy|ThatMuslimGuy]] ([[User talk:ThatMuslimGuy|talk]]) 18:42, 1 July 2014 (PDT) | :::: No this is good. And I commend you for going through the articles and rewriting them.-- [[User:ThatMuslimGuy|ThatMuslimGuy]] ([[User talk:ThatMuslimGuy|talk]]) 18:42, 1 July 2014 (PDT) | ||
:::::Ok and we look forward to seeing your new revised materials as well. | |||
:::::Have you thought of contacting other Islamic rebuttal websites and starting an apologetics wiki to coordinate the rebuttals? I say this because from my perspective ultimately such an initiative will help our site (in the long run) and for your perspective this is something you would probably want. | |||
:::::Originally I had the idea of having apologetics on our site (for example this article [http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Scientific_Errors_in_the_Qur%27an_(Response)] which is linked at the bottom of the main Errors page) but that idea didnt take off fully and now I think its better to have those things off-site so the apologetics can manage their material any way they want and we can still exchange links. You probably need a good domain name first. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 01:35, 2 July 2014 (PDT) | |||
== Reviews == | == Reviews == | ||