User talk:Saggy: Difference between revisions

User talk:Saggy (view source)

Revision as of 22:18, 2 July 2014

2,271 bytes added , 2 July 2014

→‎Scientific errors - response blog

Axius

Autochecked users, Bureaucrats, Editors, oversight, recentchangescleanup, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators

19,746

edits

@@ Line 282: / Line 282: @@
 :::::Originally I had the idea of having apologetics on our site (for example this article [http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Scientific_Errors_in_the_Qur%27an_(Response)] which is linked at the bottom of the main Errors page) but that idea didnt take off fully and now I think its better to have those things off-site so the apologetics can manage their material any way they want and we can still exchange links. You probably need a good domain name first. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 01:35, 2 July 2014 (PDT)
 ::::::Who is on whose side? Lol. It begins with the lies that we made drastic changes in the scientific errors article and put the review notice because of that blog. Barely one or two sentences we added because of it. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 12:10, 2 July 2014 (PDT)
+:::::::Competition doesnt scare me and it will motivate people on our side to do even better. We have it very easy and we dont have the burden of defending a religious leader to whom things like [http://wikiislam.net/wiki/List_of_Killings_Ordered_or_Supported_by_Muhammad this] or [http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Islamic_Silliness this] are attributed so our side is already winning.
+:::::::But indeed the blog's claims are misleading and they do suggest as I mentioned to ThatMuslimGuy before that they are written to make the reader believe we changed/removed stuff in reaction to the blog which is not true. In any case one of the claim made is:
+::::::::"I recently noticed that WikiIslam has updated there "Scientific Errors Page" with the following:"
+:::::::As mentioned we had that notice since a long time and he would have noticed that template even before because he has been writing some rebuttals since a long time (I believe some of his rebuttals are dated a while back). He only created that notice after I mentioned the blog link to you.
+:::::::The other claim made on the blog is:
+::::::::"So far they have removed various areas - some of which I addressed."
+:::::::I have asked him twice to tell us what areas we removed or edited and he hasn't responded and until he does that and is specific about which areas/sections/errors he's talking about he cannot make the claim that the areas, some of which he addressed were removed or edited.
+:::::::So ThatMuslimGuy, can you support your claim by telling us which sections that you addressed on your blog were removed? Here's a link to the [http://wikiislam.net/w/index.php?title=Scientific_Errors_in_the_Qur%27an&offset=&limit=250&action=history page history.] You can use the Diff links to go back in time to show you older versions of the page. You can give us Diff links and tell us which sections you're talking about. Here's one example of a Diff link. [http://wikiislam.net/w/index.php?title=Scientific_Errors_in_the_Qur%27an&diff=107485&oldid=107473 Diff] link or you can just copy paste the URL(s) here. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 15:18, 2 July 2014 (PDT)
 == Reviews ==