Autochecked users, Bureaucrats, Editors, oversight, recentchangescleanup, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
19,746
edits
User talk:PW. Jansen: Difference between revisions
→Heaven organized
| Line 126: | Line 126: | ||
::Axius, my knowledge is about the Qur'an and this is the scripture with most authority. To include the Hadith and Scholars is ambitious to say the least, and they have less authority. Most Muslims will have a Qur'an but I doubt that of the Hadith. This would take too much of my time to go through that. I thought I give you a hand with pages concerning the Qur'an. If you can convincingly debunk that "literal word of God", then whole Islam collapses. The Qur'an makes perfectly sense as a tool for a ruthless gangster, to create a submissive gang. I am gathering info for an essay on that and hope to publish it here. --[[User:PW. Jansen|PW. Jansen]] ([[User talk:PW. Jansen|talk]]) 02:51, 22 September 2014 (PDT) | ::Axius, my knowledge is about the Qur'an and this is the scripture with most authority. To include the Hadith and Scholars is ambitious to say the least, and they have less authority. Most Muslims will have a Qur'an but I doubt that of the Hadith. This would take too much of my time to go through that. I thought I give you a hand with pages concerning the Qur'an. If you can convincingly debunk that "literal word of God", then whole Islam collapses. The Qur'an makes perfectly sense as a tool for a ruthless gangster, to create a submissive gang. I am gathering info for an essay on that and hope to publish it here. --[[User:PW. Jansen|PW. Jansen]] ([[User talk:PW. Jansen|talk]]) 02:51, 22 September 2014 (PDT) | ||
:::Can you explain why you added the Ransom section? Are you aware that words in brackets for translators are not actual arabic words? They use those to explain things in their own words. We cannot use those words. | :::Can you explain why you added the Ransom section? Are you aware that words in brackets for translators are not actual arabic words? They use those to explain things in their own words. We cannot use those words. | ||
:::''"To include the Hadith and Scholars is ambitious to say the least, and they have less authority."'' - oh wow. You do notice that the Page title says "Quran, '''Hadith and scholars'''". And now you're saying we shouldnt include hadiths and scholars on that page? lol. What about the other QHS pages? Should we remove all hadiths and scholars from those pages? | |||
:::From now on please refrain from editing main space articles any further. You can work on Sandbox articles in whatever way you want. | :::From now on please refrain from editing main space articles any further. You can work on Sandbox articles in whatever way you want. | ||
:::Keeping in mind your previous action and edits (1. Virgins hadiths is listed under "Furniture", 2. "QHS should not have any hadiths and scholars". 3. Using a translator's word in brackets for a new section but that is much more forgiveable than 1 and 2), honestly I dont think this site is the place for you, but you are very welcome to keep working on Sandbox and I encourage that because maybe one day you may understand how we work and the approach we use here. | :::Keeping in mind your previous action and edits (1. Virgins hadiths is listed under "Furniture", 2. "QHS should not have any hadiths and scholars". 3. Using a translator's word in brackets for a new section but that is much more forgiveable than 1 and 2), honestly I dont think this site is the place for you, but you are very welcome to keep working on Sandbox and I encourage that because maybe one day you may understand how we work and the approach we use here. | ||