48,466
edits
User talk:PW. Jansen: Difference between revisions
→Heaven organized
| Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
:::Also can you explain why you added the Ransom section? Are you aware that words in brackets for translators are not actual arabic words? They use those to explain things in their own words. We cannot use those words for anything significant such as making a new heading (I repeat, the arabic word Ransom is not mentioned in that verse but anyone correct me if I'm wrong). | :::Also can you explain why you added the Ransom section? Are you aware that words in brackets for translators are not actual arabic words? They use those to explain things in their own words. We cannot use those words for anything significant such as making a new heading (I repeat, the arabic word Ransom is not mentioned in that verse but anyone correct me if I'm wrong). | ||
:::From now on please refrain from editing main space articles any further. You can work on Sandbox articles in whatever way you want. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 03:20, 22 September 2014 (PDT) | :::From now on please refrain from editing main space articles any further. You can work on Sandbox articles in whatever way you want. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 03:20, 22 September 2014 (PDT) | ||
::::'''"my knowledge is about the Qur'an and this is the scripture with most authority"''' Jansen, you do realize that Sunnis are actually named after the literature you wish to dismiss (Sirah + Hadith = Muhammad's [[Sunnah]])? And also the fact that there are hadith that [[Stoning|overrule the words of the Qur'an]] (well, I and Muslims would say a better way to describe it is "supplement" its words)? Muslims may revere the Qur'an a lot more than the hadith, but to claim it has "more authority" is debatable. I agree with Axius. To suggest the hadith and scholars should be left out of a QHS page is ridiculous. They are valid religious texts that hold more value to the everyday life of a Muslim than the Qur'an ever will. And there is nothing at all "ambitious" about it. The wiki already has plenty of pages that cover all relevant religious texts (e.g. [http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Lying_and_Deception Lying]). And this is coming from someone who wishes for "completeness". Unbelievable. [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 11:49, 22 September 2014 (PDT) | |||
== Proposed addition to contradictions in the Qur'an == | == Proposed addition to contradictions in the Qur'an == | ||