48,466
edits
User talk:Heitri2: Difference between revisions
→Edits
(→Edits: for Heitri2) |
(→Edits) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
::::Please read and follow the directions on [[WikiIslam:Message to New Users]] before making any further contributions. If this was read to begin with, there probably wouldn't be so many issues with your edits. Thanks. [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 16:40, 14 March 2015 (PDT) | ::::Please read and follow the directions on [[WikiIslam:Message to New Users]] before making any further contributions. If this was read to begin with, there probably wouldn't be so many issues with your edits. Thanks. [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 16:40, 14 March 2015 (PDT) | ||
:::::A perfect example of what happens when editors rush to add things without even reading the page properly [http://wikiislam.net/w/index.php?title=Misinterpreted_Qur%27anic_Verses&diff=prev&oldid=111835#Let_there_be_no_compulsion_in_religion_.282:256.29]. The "No Compulsion" section clearly says, '''''"Ibn Kathir in the version of his tafsir abridged by Sheikh Muhammad Nasib Ar-Rafa‘i, has this to say (note that this portion has not been translated by Safiur Rahman Mubarakpuri who is responsible for the abridged version of Tafsir Ibn Kathir widely available on the internet):"''''' before going on to quote what was left out of the '''abridged version of Tafsir Ibn Kathir widely available on the internet'''. So why on earth did you decide to copy/paste a massive block of text from '''the abridged version of Tafsir Ibn Kathir widely available on the internet''' (that is essentially Muslim apologetics) directly beneath the quote that proves the very same thing you quoted is disingenuous in the way it presents its information? | |||
:::::Okay, I will be reverting your edits to our French articles because I don't understand French and I'm not comfortable at all with leaving unchecked edits made by you on this site. [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 17:15, 14 March 2015 (PDT) | |||