Islamophilia: Difference between revisions

Islamophilia (view source)

Revision as of 15:01, 28 September 2015

863 bytes removed , 28 September 2015

rv, not a good/reliable source

[unchecked revision]

[checked revision]

Axius

Autochecked users, Bureaucrats, Editors, oversight, recentchangescleanup, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators

19,746

edits

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 Author Bat Yeor regards the Islamophilia of non-Muslims which live under the "protected" status  of a dhimmi, as one of the symptoms of [[dhimmitude]]: criticizing Islam can have severe repercussions for dhimmi's, as manifest in e.g. [[Persecution of Non-Muslims#Pakistan|Pakistan]], where several Christians have been sentenced to prison terms and even death on accusations of blasphemy. Thus according to her, fear is an important motivation.
-Project315 supposes that Islamophilia in the West is a result of the necessary moral equivalence between ALL religions for the prominent relativistic worldview of the West to be maintained.  If Islam is examined and it is demonstrably true that the teachings of Muhammad (Islam) are more like fascism and Naziism than the altruistic and peaceful teachings of Christ and His apostles (Christianity), then a cataclysmic paradigm shift should happen, especially in academia, as relativism (the most prominent worldview espoused today in academia) will be tossed in the ash heap of history alongside other failed philosophical theories. [http://www.project315.net/blog/why-so-many-in-the-west-committed-to-defending-islam-as-a-religion-of-peace]
 [[Theo van Gogh]] hypothetized that the eulogy of Dutch politicians of Islam was motivated by the wish to control tensions between Muslims and non-Muslims.
@@ Line 59: / Line 57: @@
 [[Category:Terms and Definitions]]
- <ref>http://www.project315.net/blog/why-so-many-in-the-west-committed-to-defending-islam-as-a-religion-of-peace</ref>