Autochecked users, Bureaucrats, Editors, oversight, recentchangescleanup, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
19,746
edits
User talk:Sauron: Difference between revisions
→List of Muhammad's Wives and Concubines
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Thanks for the reply. My critic is purely academic. I am an ex-muslim and wikiislam is actually the best critical source i have found on islam. Still i would say adding a bracket(shia) information would probably be helpful. Also maybe could remove the sahih bukhari and muslim citation because it doesn't have anything to do with god marrying him to the girls. | Thanks for the reply. My critic is purely academic. I am an ex-muslim and wikiislam is actually the best critical source i have found on islam. Still i would say adding a bracket(shia) information would probably be helpful. Also maybe could remove the sahih bukhari and muslim citation because it doesn't have anything to do with god marrying him to the girls. | ||
: Academically, ''all sources are all part of Islam'' and should be treated as such. As I said we cannot remove sourced text and we cannot start adding shia or Sunni or all the other sects of Islam to all the content. | : I dont know if you're an ex-Muslim or not, but you are wanting to remove sourced information from the page. | ||
:Academically, ''all sources are all part of Islam'' and should be treated as such. As I said we cannot remove sourced text and we cannot start adding shia or Sunni or all the other sects of Islam to all the content. | |||
:Are you having difficult debating with people about the topic? Its easy. Tell them the same thing you told me. All sources of Islam can be used for criticism of Islam. It is valid information and cannot be rejected simply because its found in one sect of Islam. | :Are you having difficult debating with people about the topic? Its easy. Tell them the same thing you told me. All sources of Islam can be used for criticism of Islam. It is valid information and cannot be rejected simply because its found in one sect of Islam. | ||
:The Quran doesnt say that all other sects of Islam are invalid, or anything like that. So what is your basis for asking to remove text from a Shite source? Majlisi is a Shite source. Why did you call it Ahmadiya in your edit history? | :The Quran doesnt say that all other sects of Islam are invalid, or anything like that. So what is your basis for asking to remove text from a Shite source? Majlisi is a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_Baqir_Majlisi Shite] source. Why did you call it Ahmadiya in your edit history? | ||
:The other information/hadiths contain the other information that is mentioned in the piece of text. It all goes together. | :The other information/hadiths contain the other information that is mentioned in the piece of text. It all goes together. | ||
:Basically again, you are wanting to removed sourced information from the page. | :Basically again, you are wanting to removed sourced information from the page. We have spent enough time on this issue. As I pointed out its all sourced the fact that Muhammad said Queen Asiya will be one of his wives in heaven is a minor issue in Islam, compared to other more important issues. | ||
--[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 06:36, 20 January 2016 (EST) | :--[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 06:36, 20 January 2016 (EST) | ||