WikiIslam:Discussions/Visitor Inquiries: Difference between revisions
WikiIslam:Discussions/Visitor Inquiries (view source)
Revision as of 10:03, 1 February 2016
, 1 February 2016→What about more "responses to apologetics" ?: new section
(Undo revision 113625 by 107.216.221.133 (talk) - moved) |
(→What about more "responses to apologetics" ?: new section) |
||
| Line 467: | Line 467: | ||
Has anybody ever combined the Qur'an, Hadith, and Ishaq/Tabari into a single, chronologically ordered document? | Has anybody ever combined the Qur'an, Hadith, and Ishaq/Tabari into a single, chronologically ordered document? | ||
: As far as I know it hasnt been done. I think the problem is that there's no knowledge of what happened when, so there could be a lot of variation and no one could say that their version of events is right. Maybe if someone only used important events for which they definitely knew the dates they could try. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 17:12, 18 August 2015 (PDT)--[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 17:12, 18 August 2015 (PDT) | : As far as I know it hasnt been done. I think the problem is that there's no knowledge of what happened when, so there could be a lot of variation and no one could say that their version of events is right. Maybe if someone only used important events for which they definitely knew the dates they could try. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 17:12, 18 August 2015 (PDT)--[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 17:12, 18 August 2015 (PDT) | ||
== What about more "responses to apologetics" ? == | |||
I am writing this as a confused muslim. You know,there are lots of islamic websites,they have thousands of "rebuttals to islamic critics" and just a few anti islamic ones against them.So when muslims come across an argument against islam, they think "well,im sure someone has already refutted this,so lets not worry about it." It seems like that "Critics of islam have all said what is to be said against islam,but apologetics refutted them all,so there is nothing left to say." Probably that is what apologetics think or try to prove.Considering these,I have a suggestion.I think you should have more "responses to apologetics",so that we,as readers,can decide more reasonably which side is more plausible and you can be more "convincing" that way.Thank you. | |||