2,743
edits
Scientific Errors in the Quran: Difference between revisions
Scientific Errors in the Quran (view source)
Revision as of 11:55, 20 September 2016
, 20 September 2016Removed Under Review flag. I've gone through the whole page, making lots of corrections, removals and improvements (see also the discussion tab). Always room for improvement, but I think it's a good enough standard currently to be without the review flag.
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
Lightyears (talk | contribs) m (→Linguistics) |
Lightyears (talk | contribs) (Removed Under Review flag. I've gone through the whole page, making lots of corrections, removals and improvements (see also the discussion tab). Always room for improvement, but I think it's a good enough standard currently to be without the review flag.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{page_title|Scientific Errors in the Qur'an}} | {{page_title|Scientific Errors in the Qur'an}} | ||
Muslims believe that the [[Qur'an]] contains a message from an all-powerful, all-knowing, infallible being. If this is true then it should not contain any [[Contradictions and Errors|errors, mistakes]], or information that contradicts known facts about the universe. If even one error exists in the text of [[Islam]]'s holy book then the claims of divine authorship and infallibility are not true. An objective evaluation of the Qur’an shows that it contains numerous [[Islam and Science|scientific]] and historical errors and it reflects a pre-scientific, 7<sup>th</sup> century view of the natural world. | Muslims believe that the [[Qur'an]] contains a message from an all-powerful, all-knowing, infallible being. If this is true then it should not contain any [[Contradictions and Errors|errors, mistakes]], or information that contradicts known facts about the universe. If even one error exists in the text of [[Islam]]'s holy book then the claims of divine authorship and infallibility are not true. An objective evaluation of the Qur’an shows that it contains numerous [[Islam and Science|scientific]] and historical errors and it reflects a pre-scientific, 7<sup>th</sup> century view of the natural world. | ||