Shaytan and angel word count in the Qur'an: Difference between revisions

[unchecked revision][unchecked revision]
Line 389: Line 389:


* When counting all possible forms, then both have the word count 88. It's not a miracle, but it's true.
* When counting all possible forms, then both have the word count 88. It's not a miracle, but it's true.
** In other word counts apologists excluded many words (words with suffixes, words with prefixes, dual and plural forms..), because they weren't "basic form" enough. But when all the occurrences have a nice number, then suddenly there is no need to count only the "basic form" and all words are counted.
** In other word counts apologists excluded many words (words with suffixes, words with prefixes, dual and plural forms..), because they weren't "basic form" enough. But when all the occurrences have a nice number, then suddenly there is no need to count only the "basic form" and all words are counted. Also in the miracle "Righteous and wicked" the "righteous" had a double word count, because they are better. So why angels don't have a double word count over ''shaytans''? Shouldn't there be the same logic between righteous-wicked and angels-shaytans?


==See also==
==See also==
Editors, em-bypass-2
4,744

edits