Editors, em-bypass-2
4,744
edits
Shaytan and angel word count in the Qur'an: Difference between revisions
Shaytan and angel word count in the Qur'an (view source)
Revision as of 19:49, 17 November 2016
, 17 November 2016→Conclusions
| [unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
Prekladator (talk | contribs) |
Prekladator (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 390: | Line 390: | ||
* When counting all possible forms, then both have the word count 88. It's not a miracle, but it's true. | * When counting all possible forms, then both have the word count 88. It's not a miracle, but it's true. | ||
** In other word counts apologists excluded many words (words with suffixes, words with prefixes, dual and plural forms..), because they weren't "basic form" enough. But when all the occurrences have a nice number, then suddenly there is no need to count only the "basic form" and all words are counted. Also in the miracle "Righteous and wicked" the "righteous" had a double word count, because they are better. So why angels don't have a double word count over ''shaytans''? Shouldn't there be the same logic between righteous-wicked and angels-shaytans? | ** In other word counts apologists excluded many words (words with suffixes, words with prefixes, dual and plural forms..), because they weren't "basic form" enough. But when all the occurrences have a nice number, then suddenly there is no need to count only the "basic form" and all words are counted. Also in the miracle "Righteous and wicked" the "righteous" had a double word count, because they are better. So why angels don't have a double word count over ''shaytans''? Shouldn't there be the same logic between righteous-wicked and angels-shaytans? | ||
** Couldn't Allah make also the singular forms word count equal, so that we can be sure that this is not just a coincidence? | |||
** Why believers-disbelievers and similar pairs don't have the same word count? | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||