WikiIslam talk:Tasks: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

WikiIslam talk:Tasks (view source)

Revision as of 10:31, 6 July 2017

290 bytes added , 6 July 2017

→‎Debating guide

Saggy

em-bypass-2

1,979

edits

Revision as of 08:39, 6 July 2017 (view source) Prekladator (talk \| contribs) (→‎Debating guide: new section)		Latest revision as of 10:31, 6 July 2017 (view source) Saggy (talk \| contribs) (→‎Debating guide)
Line 4:		Line 4:

	"common types of attitudes seen from the other side and how to deal with it" - there could be a list of commong arguments used by people who defend islam. But I would not command people how they should deal with it. It's their choice. I don't want to make people debating robots. If everyone debated the same way, then they could be easily recognizable and islam-defenders would be like "Yeah you are the one from wikiislam." We should be creative in debates. --[[User:Prekladator\|Prekladator]] ([[User talk:Prekladator\|talk]]) 04:39, 6 July 2017 (EDT)		"common types of attitudes seen from the other side and how to deal with it" - there could be a list of commong arguments used by people who defend islam. But I would not command people how they should deal with it. It's their choice. I don't want to make people debating robots. If everyone debated the same way, then they could be easily recognizable and islam-defenders would be like "Yeah you are the one from wikiislam." We should be creative in debates. --[[User:Prekladator\|Prekladator]] ([[User talk:Prekladator\|talk]]) 04:39, 6 July 2017 (EDT)
			:Makes sense. The alternative to a debating guide would be an article or hub page on "common apologetic claims" and their refutation. I guess we have articles about this topic, but FFI and Answering Islam surely do. [[User:Saggy\|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy\|talk]]) 06:31, 6 July 2017 (EDT)