Waswas: Difference between revisions

136 bytes added ,  21 July 2018
[unchecked revision][unchecked revision]
Line 85: Line 85:


EDIT: The question around "Who created Allah?" - well, Allah tells us Himself in the Quran - He was not created and neither can he be destroyed (like energy in physics). Two of Allahs names are Al-Awwal (the first) and Al-Akhir (the last). Also, here the article writer is thinking of Allah in terms of HUMAN LOGIC! When Allah is being who CANNOT be understood by human logic alone.  
EDIT: The question around "Who created Allah?" - well, Allah tells us Himself in the Quran - He was not created and neither can he be destroyed (like energy in physics). Two of Allahs names are Al-Awwal (the first) and Al-Akhir (the last). Also, here the article writer is thinking of Allah in terms of HUMAN LOGIC! When Allah is being who CANNOT be understood by human logic alone.  
Plus, the article writer is imposing the tributes of TIME (a human invention) on Allah. Allah is eternal. The human mind is incapable of grasping what eternity actually means. Much less understand the nature of Allah.  
 
Plus, the article writer is imposing the attributes of TIME (a human invention) on Allah. Allah is eternal. The human mind is incapable of grasping what eternity actually means. Much less understand the nature of Allah.  
Infinity is a concept mathematicians have difficulty with today as well!  
Infinity is a concept mathematicians have difficulty with today as well!  
I laugh at people who dismiss the existence of Allah, using only the extent of human logic and understanding.  
I laugh at people who dismiss the existence of Allah, using only the extent of human logic and understanding.  
You cannot anthropomorphize Allah! Please stop doing that! Humans can be so arrogant. May Allah have mercy on us.




Also, attacking the source of counter-arguments, instead of actually analyzing and refuting them is a logical ''[[W:Ad hominem|ad hominem]]'' fallacy.
Also, attacking the source of counter-arguments, instead of actually analyzing and refuting them is a logical ''[[W:Ad hominem|ad hominem]]'' fallacy. EDIT: See above.  


Also if Allah created everything, then he created waswas. If he created waswas to test Muslims whether they are good enough Muslims, then the whole concept stops making sense, because why would he test them, when he is all-knowing and already knows the results? As we can see, when we consider the waswas concept together with other Islamic concepts like all-knowingness and testing belivers, it all stops making sense.
Also if Allah created everything, then he created waswas. If he created waswas to test Muslims whether they are good enough Muslims, then the whole concept stops making sense, because why would he test them, when he is all-knowing and already knows the results? As we can see, when we consider the waswas concept together with other Islamic concepts like all-knowingness and testing belivers, it all stops making sense.
Anonymous user