231
edits
User talk:Damaskin: Difference between revisions
→Reverted edits
Lightyears (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
I saw that you changed the wine article back to the old version that we had prior to my review and re-write. I did this re-write following feedback from Ex-Muslims and Muslims. There was agreement that the old article needed changing due to a host of problems, so I have reverted your changes to that. It's possible that this one will see further work during the revamp project. Thanks for your other work and patience while we commence the initial stages of the project. [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 11:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC) | I saw that you changed the wine article back to the old version that we had prior to my review and re-write. I did this re-write following feedback from Ex-Muslims and Muslims. There was agreement that the old article needed changing due to a host of problems, so I have reverted your changes to that. It's possible that this one will see further work during the revamp project. Thanks for your other work and patience while we commence the initial stages of the project. [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 11:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
Hi AbdulHurayrah, | |||
First I apologize for the inconvenience I have created, but I thought the changes for vandalism. The truth is that both articles(the wine article) have their weaknesses, but yours resemble a Pro-Islamic because I did not see used weak hadiths as you mentioned. Usually, Muslims justify that some hadith is weak when it is not profitable. I do not know how much you know Islamic scriptures, but I have no long been consulted with Muslims on controversial issues. | |||
Regarding the four articles, they are 5 that I saw were deleted and I was shocked. Some of them were emblematic and very strong in their argumentation. I still can not understand what the new site policy is, but I will look forward to finding out. Please do not be angry with my reaction, but I love the site and want to see it still uncompromising. | |||
My English is not good at regrouping or writing articles on the English site. For translations from English to Bulgarian, I have used paid professional translators. So I apologize for writing to you bad English now. | |||
I will be happy to communicate more in the future to work for the good of the site and the truth. | |||
Best regards, | |||
Damaskin | |||