Iltifat: Difference between revisions

41 bytes added ,  10 April 2020
[checked revision][checked revision]
Line 3: Line 3:
The apologetic interpretation is that the so called "iltifat" is intentional and that it makes the Quran better. And the critical interpretation is that the Quran was poorly written or poorly preserved.
The apologetic interpretation is that the so called "iltifat" is intentional and that it makes the Quran better. And the critical interpretation is that the Quran was poorly written or poorly preserved.
==Examples==
==Examples==
* This is not a complete list of examples
* This is not a complete list of examples. Every category has only one example
* Not all examples are equally strange. Some are strange only a little and some are very strange
* Some examples are debatable, but the purpose was to show all kinds of iltifat that were suggested


===In pronouns===
===In pronouns===
Line 90: Line 90:
}}
}}
It seems that the verbs are both in future tense, however, the first one is in the present <ref>present - imperfect http://corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(27:87:2)</ref> and the second in the past <ref>past - perfect http://corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(27:87:5)</ref>. So "the day the horn is blown, they were terrified".
It seems that the verbs are both in future tense, however, the first one is in the present <ref>present - imperfect http://corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(27:87:2)</ref> and the second in the past <ref>past - perfect http://corpus.quran.com/wordmorphology.jsp?location=(27:87:5)</ref>. So "the day the horn is blown, they were terrified".
==See also==
==See also==
* [[Spelling Inconsistencies in the Quran]]
* [[Spelling Inconsistencies in the Quran]]


==References==
==References==
Editors, em-bypass-2
4,744

edits