WikiIslam:Sandbox/Fernando/Mecca: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
m (Minor changes to the body of the text. Plus a reply to the comments on it with more questions.)
No edit summary
Line 80: Line 80:
:It will take me some time to check out your very helpful suggestions, although I am familiar with most of the authors you mention.  In the meantime I think it would be useful to get the extra Crone reference and the Gibson/King debate into the existing article.  And questioning its assumption that Becca = Mecca.  What are the conventions about changing an existing article?
:It will take me some time to check out your very helpful suggestions, although I am familiar with most of the authors you mention.  In the meantime I think it would be useful to get the extra Crone reference and the Gibson/King debate into the existing article.  And questioning its assumption that Becca = Mecca.  What are the conventions about changing an existing article?
:
:
::Sounds good. I'm an admin here and wrote a lot of the articles, but I'm not involved in the new user on-boarding process or what ASmith may have advised. I believe there are a bunch of pages via the New Contributors link on the sidebar explaining standards, how to add quote templates etc. An example of a recent newly expanded article which covers an academic debate is the one on Prophecies in the Quran, particularly the section on the Romans prophecy which has a good sprinkling of quotes and citations yet concise enough to hold the reader's interest. Normally new users are expected to make small simple edits to start with, so the gradual approach sounds ok to me. Our pending edits feature is currently broken so you won't have to wait for each edit to be approved. At some point when you've finished ASmith or I can tweak, add templates where necessary etc. [[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 22:20, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Editors, em-bypass-2, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
2,743

edits