311
edits
Le Hijab (voile islamique): Difference between revisions
Le Hijab (voile islamique) (view source)
Revision as of 14:03, 11 September 2023
, 11 September 2023→Dans la loi islamique
| [unchecked revision] | [checked revision] |
No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
==Dans la loi islamique== | ==Dans la loi islamique== | ||
Bucar | Bucar détaille comment différentes opinions sur le voile ont existé entre et au sein des écoles de jurisprudence islamique au fil du temps, probablement influencées par les différents contextes culturels (elle utilise le terme "voile" pour signifier les concepts islamiques pertinents dans un sens général).<ref name="Bucar49-58">Elizabeth Bucar, ''The Islamic Veil (Le Voile Islamique)'', pp. 49-58</ref> | ||
She writes that "Early ''fiqh'' discussed veiling in the context of prayer, and in general saw veiling as an issue of social status and physical safety". Later, it was not a central concern of medieval legal scholars, though their reasoning remains relevant to modern discussions about veiling. Regarding the concept of 'awra mentioned in Q. 24:31 and discussed above, the majority view was that it excluded a woman's hands and face (the main Maliki and Hanafi view), though a minority view was that everything should be covered except her eyes despite no mention of this in the Quran, while hadiths indicate this was not common practice for early Muslim communities. Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 1328 CE) who inspired modern day Salafism said that her face should be covered in public, which became the standard Shafi'i and Hanbali legal position. Legal scholars also commonly linked 'awra with the concept of fitnah mentioned separately in the Quran. Bucar quotes the prominent jurist al-Nawawi (d. 1278) as an exemplar of this view, which is a motivation argued by some emerging Islamic governments in modern times: | She writes that "Early ''fiqh'' discussed veiling in the context of prayer, and in general saw veiling as an issue of social status and physical safety". Later, it was not a central concern of medieval legal scholars, though their reasoning remains relevant to modern discussions about veiling. Regarding the concept of 'awra mentioned in Q. 24:31 and discussed above, the majority view was that it excluded a woman's hands and face (the main Maliki and Hanafi view), though a minority view was that everything should be covered except her eyes despite no mention of this in the Quran, while hadiths indicate this was not common practice for early Muslim communities. Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 1328 CE) who inspired modern day Salafism said that her face should be covered in public, which became the standard Shafi'i and Hanbali legal position. Legal scholars also commonly linked 'awra with the concept of fitnah mentioned separately in the Quran. Bucar quotes the prominent jurist al-Nawawi (d. 1278) as an exemplar of this view, which is a motivation argued by some emerging Islamic governments in modern times: | ||