48,466
edits
User talk:Al-Qaum: Difference between revisions
m
→So: sp
(→So) |
m (→So: sp) |
||
| Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
Can this go in the news section? [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10390430/Assad-regime-snipers-targeting-unborn-babies.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10390430/Assad-regime-snipers-targeting-unborn-babies.html].--[[User:Lemming|Lemming]] ([[User talk:Lemming|talk]]) 08:32, 20 October 2013 (PDT) | Can this go in the news section? [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10390430/Assad-regime-snipers-targeting-unborn-babies.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10390430/Assad-regime-snipers-targeting-unborn-babies.html].--[[User:Lemming|Lemming]] ([[User talk:Lemming|talk]]) 08:32, 20 October 2013 (PDT) | ||
:Western propaganda. Thanks anyway[[User:Al-Qaum|Al-Qaum]] ([[User talk:Al-Qaum|talk]]) 16:01, 20 October 2013 (PDT) | :Western propaganda. Thanks anyway[[User:Al-Qaum|Al-Qaum]] ([[User talk:Al-Qaum|talk]]) 16:01, 20 October 2013 (PDT) | ||
::Agreed. This story is so obviously BS that it's laughable. There is nothing | ::Agreed. This story is so obviously BS that it's laughable. There is nothing except a badly photoshopped image to back up what this one British guy is saying, and the comments being posted on that article are tearing the claim apart. It's ironic that the very same article mentions how these al-Qaeda linked terrorists have only recently ''snipered'' the head of the Syrian military intelligence. Actually, even the lying Brit admits "he could not be certain which side the snipers were on". Magical snipers who can get headshots on unborn babies. Who'da think it?[[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 16:31, 20 October 2013 (PDT) | ||
:Yeah[[User:Al-Qaum|Al-Qaum]] ([[User talk:Al-Qaum|talk]]) 16:38, 20 October 2013 (PDT) | :Yeah[[User:Al-Qaum|Al-Qaum]] ([[User talk:Al-Qaum|talk]]) 16:38, 20 October 2013 (PDT) | ||