Autochecked users, em-bypass-1, em-bypass-2
645
edits
User:Flynnjed/Sandbox: Difference between revisions
→Circumcision is not Mutilation
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
This dilemma faces not just on-the-ground charity workers, but the whole hierarchy of institutions devoted to combating FGM. To resolve the dilemma a number of propositions have evolved to support the proposition that FGM is un-Islamic. | This dilemma faces not just on-the-ground charity workers, but the whole hierarchy of institutions devoted to combating FGM. To resolve the dilemma a number of propositions have evolved to support the proposition that FGM is un-Islamic. | ||
===FGM is not required by Islam=== | ===FGM is not required by Islam=== | ||
{{Quote|[https://www.academia.edu/6142789/Egypts_Villages_Fight_Female_Genital_Mutilation_WFS_NEWS Dr Ahmed Talib, Dean of the Faculty of Sharia at Al-Azhar University]|“All practices of female circumcision and mutilation are crimes and have no relationship with Islam. Whether it involves the removal of the skin or the cutting of the flesh of the female genital organs… '''it is not an obligation in Islam'''.”}}Critics of Dr Talib's position can point out that ''<nowiki/>'not an obligation''' is no more acceptable ethical or legal or ethical position for a practice such as FGM than it is for murder, child sexual abuse or rape. | {{Quote|[https://www.academia.edu/6142789/Egypts_Villages_Fight_Female_Genital_Mutilation_WFS_NEWS Dr Ahmed Talib, Dean of the Faculty of Sharia at Al-Azhar University]|“All practices of female circumcision and mutilation are crimes and have no relationship with Islam. Whether it involves the removal of the skin or the cutting of the flesh of the female genital organs… '''it is not an obligation in Islam'''.”}}'''''Critics of Dr Talib's position can point out that ''<nowiki/>'not an obligation''' is no more acceptable ethical or legal or ethical position for a practice such as FGM than it is for murder, child sexual abuse or rape. | ||
'Not an obligation' is far from the same thing as 'forbidden'. The legitimacy of an act that is not obligatory can include 'tolerated', 'allowed', 'recommended' and 'highly recommended' as well as 'forbidden'. And acts that are '''not an obligation''<nowiki/>' can be virtuous (e.g. giving to charity), vicious (e.g. murder), or ethically neutral (e.g. owning a dog). | 'Not an obligation' is far from the same thing as 'forbidden'. The legitimacy of an act that is not obligatory can include 'tolerated', 'allowed', 'recommended' and 'highly recommended' as well as 'forbidden'. And acts that are '''not an obligation''<nowiki/>' can be virtuous (e.g. giving to charity), vicious (e.g. murder), or ethically neutral (e.g. owning a dog). | ||
His first sentence ("All practices of female circumcision and mutilation are crimes and have no relationship with Islam") sets up the expectation that FGM is an act that should be forbidden. Which raises the question of why he fails to deliver the obvious corollary of this in his conclusion - that FGM is forbidden in Islam. Instead his conclusion is ambiguous - failing as it does to foreclose the possibility that, for all his condemnation of the practice, that FGM might nevertheless be virtuous and highly recommended in Islam. | His first sentence ("All practices of female circumcision and mutilation are crimes and have no relationship with Islam") sets up the expectation that FGM is an act that should be forbidden. Which raises the question of why he fails to deliver the obvious corollary of this in his conclusion - that FGM is forbidden in Islam. Instead his conclusion is ambiguous - failing as it does to foreclose the possibility that, for all his condemnation of the practice, that FGM might nevertheless be virtuous and highly recommended in Islam. | ||
| Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
The limited, prescribed religious ritual of female circumcision has been regrettably deemed by the WHO to be a form of female genital mutilation [...] The classification of female circumcision as FGM “reinforces the image of female circumcision as a barbaric one, practiced by an uncivilised people.” Conflating the practice of female circumcision with mutilation prohibits any possibility of impartiality in considering the practice as a legitimate, protected religious rite.}} | The limited, prescribed religious ritual of female circumcision has been regrettably deemed by the WHO to be a form of female genital mutilation [...] The classification of female circumcision as FGM “reinforces the image of female circumcision as a barbaric one, practiced by an uncivilised people.” Conflating the practice of female circumcision with mutilation prohibits any possibility of impartiality in considering the practice as a legitimate, protected religious rite.}} | ||
The term Female Circumcision is sometimes used by those who consider certain practices commonly classified as FGM as insufficiently harmful or traumatic to merit the epithet 'mutilation'. | |||
that which is 'islmic' can't be a mutilation because of Qur'an 2:195 | that which is 'islmic' can't be a mutilation because of Qur'an 2:195 | ||
definition of mutilation | definition of mutilation | ||