Autochecked users, Bureaucrats, Editors, oversight, recentchangescleanup, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
19,746
edits
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
:::::::Oh, sorry, I'm getting mixed up with what you're saying. Maybe you should just do it and I can see what it is? [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 18:03, 5 March 2014 (PST) | :::::::Oh, sorry, I'm getting mixed up with what you're saying. Maybe you should just do it and I can see what it is? [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 18:03, 5 March 2014 (PST) | ||
::::::::Ok I'm done. So the big thing again is that we have one easily accessible Discussions link for active discussions for current editors. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] ([[User talk:Axius|talk]]) 18:43, 5 March 2014 (PST) | ::::::::Ok I'm done. So the big thing again is that we have one easily accessible Discussions link for active discussions for current editors. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] ([[User talk:Axius|talk]]) 18:43, 5 March 2014 (PST) | ||
:::::::::Still not satisfied but its a better situation than before. I would have to have two kinds of discussions, one should be Project/work related and the other can be general/anything goes/just passing by. This way we keep the important stuff in one place and the less important chat/"hey"/question type comments in one place. We dont have enough comments to warrant any other additional sections. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] ([[User talk:Axius|talk]]) 18:54, 5 March 2014 (PST) |
edits