em-bypass-1
14
edits
WikiIslam:Sandbox/Refutación de los apologistas modernos contra la edad de Aisha: Difference between revisions
WikiIslam:Sandbox/Refutación de los apologistas modernos contra la edad de Aisha (view source)
Revision as of 22:09, 18 October 2014
, 18 October 2014→Historia
Chingolito (talk | contribs) |
Chingolito (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
+++ | +++ | ||
Además de las objeciones de Ali está la de Habib Ur Rahman Siddiqui Kandhalvi (1924-1991), quien en su ºUrdu bookletº, ''Tehqiq e umar e Siddiqah e Ka'inat'' (English trans. 1997º), se lamenta por estar «cansado de defender esta tradición» de la cual se «ríen» y la cual es «ridiculizada» por los individuos ingleses ºeducated / con educaciónº que encuentra en Karachi*, quienes afirman que va en contra de la «sagacidad y prudencia» y que «prefieren la ºEnglish society / sociedad inglesaº a la islámica respecto a este tema», y ºreadily admits / admite prontamente*º que su «propósito es ºproduce / salir con /producirº una respuesta a los enemigos del Islam que ºspatter / salpicanº lodo * {¿o expresión?} al piadoso cuerpo del ºGenerous Prophet / Generoso Profetaº».<ref>Todas las citas a Habib Ur Rahman Siddiqui Kandhalvi son tomadas del prefacio de la traducción al inglés de 2007 de su ºUrdu bookletº ''Tehqiq e umar e Siddiqah e Ka'inat'', traducido por Nigar Erfaney y publicado por Al-Rahman Publishing Trust con el título ''Age of Aisha (The Truthful Women, May Allah Send His Blessings)''.</ref> Un fatwa* póstumo fue publicado en su contra en noviembre de 2004, ºlabelling / tildándoloº de ''Munkir-e-Hadith'' («ºhadith rejectorº») y de ''Kafir'' (infiel) ºon the basis of being a rejector of hadith.<ref>El fatwa* orifinal y la traducción al inglés ºbrandingº las creencias ºoutside of Islam / fuera del islamismo*º de Habib Ur Rahman Siddiqui Kandhalvi, convirtiéndolo así en ''kafir'', pueden verse aquí: [{{Reference archive|1=http://marifah.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=3036|2=2012-09-24}} Fatwa's on hadith rejectors?]</ref> | |||
More recently, there is Moiz Amjad (who refers to himself as "The Learner"). He readily admits to having lifted these faulty arguments from them, summarizing and presenting them in response to a Muslim asking him how he can respond to Christians who called Muhammad a pedophile (i.e. all of his arguments, like Ali's and Kandhalvi's before him, were apologetic in nature rather than scholarly).<ref>See: "[http://www.islamawareness.net/FAQ/what_was_ayesha.html What was Ayesha's (ra) Age at the Time of Her Marriage?]", by Moiz Amjad.</ref> It was at this very recent point in history that the arguments originating from the Ahmadiyya in the 1920s and 1930s finally achieved a little popularity among a few orthodox Muslims. However, this popularity seems to be strictly limited to articles or arguments on the Internet. Clearly a knee-jerk reaction to the avalanche in online criticism of Muhammad's life, as opposed to a tangible shift in beliefs. | More recently, there is Moiz Amjad (who refers to himself as "The Learner"). He readily admits to having lifted these faulty arguments from them, summarizing and presenting them in response to a Muslim asking him how he can respond to Christians who called Muhammad a pedophile (i.e. all of his arguments, like Ali's and Kandhalvi's before him, were apologetic in nature rather than scholarly).<ref>See: "[http://www.islamawareness.net/FAQ/what_was_ayesha.html What was Ayesha's (ra) Age at the Time of Her Marriage?]", by Moiz Amjad.</ref> It was at this very recent point in history that the arguments originating from the Ahmadiyya in the 1920s and 1930s finally achieved a little popularity among a few orthodox Muslims. However, this popularity seems to be strictly limited to articles or arguments on the Internet. Clearly a knee-jerk reaction to the avalanche in online criticism of Muhammad's life, as opposed to a tangible shift in beliefs. | ||