4,636
edits
Old Hijazi: Difference between revisions
→Final short vowels and Nunation in the Quranic Readings Tradition
| [unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
m (→Final short vowels and Nunation in the Quranic Readings Tradition: trying youtube template) |
|||
| Line 687: | Line 687: | ||
{{Youtube|1=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWxjAURbMYw&t=22s}} | {{Youtube|1=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWxjAURbMYw&t=22s}} | ||
<center><youtube>bWxjAURbMYw</youtube></center> | |||
Since that these letters should be inflected in Classical Arabic, why were they left without any inflection in the readings tradition? Van Putten answers:{{Quote|[https://www.academia.edu/71626921/Quranic_Arabic_From_its_Hijazi_Origins_to_its_Classical_Reading_Traditions_Studies_in_Semitic_Languages_and_Linguistics_106 Marijn Van Putten, Quranic Arabic, p.200]|The form of the mysterious letters is fairly easy to understand from a situation that started out as lacking inflectional endings, which were classicized. | Since that these letters should be inflected in Classical Arabic, why were they left without any inflection in the readings tradition? Van Putten answers:{{Quote|[https://www.academia.edu/71626921/Quranic_Arabic_From_its_Hijazi_Origins_to_its_Classical_Reading_Traditions_Studies_in_Semitic_Languages_and_Linguistics_106 Marijn Van Putten, Quranic Arabic, p.200]|The form of the mysterious letters is fairly easy to understand from a situation that started out as lacking inflectional endings, which were classicized. | ||