Old Hijazi: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
34 bytes removed ,  31 December 2023
[unchecked revision][unchecked revision]
Line 687: Line 687:
{{Youtube|1=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWxjAURbMYw&t=22s}}
{{Youtube|1=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWxjAURbMYw&t=22s}}


<nowiki><center><youtube>bWxjAURbMYw</youtube></nowiki><nowiki></center></nowiki>
<center><youtube>bWxjAURbMYw</youtube></center>


Since that these letters should be inflected in Classical Arabic, why were they left without any inflection in the readings tradition? Van Putten answers:{{Quote|[https://www.academia.edu/71626921/Quranic_Arabic_From_its_Hijazi_Origins_to_its_Classical_Reading_Traditions_Studies_in_Semitic_Languages_and_Linguistics_106 Marijn Van Putten, Quranic Arabic, p.200]|The form of the mysterious letters is fairly easy to understand from a situation that started out as lacking inflectional endings, which were classicized.
Since that these letters should be inflected in Classical Arabic, why were they left without any inflection in the readings tradition? Van Putten answers:{{Quote|[https://www.academia.edu/71626921/Quranic_Arabic_From_its_Hijazi_Origins_to_its_Classical_Reading_Traditions_Studies_in_Semitic_Languages_and_Linguistics_106 Marijn Van Putten, Quranic Arabic, p.200]|The form of the mysterious letters is fairly easy to understand from a situation that started out as lacking inflectional endings, which were classicized.
Editors, recentchangescleanup, Reviewers
4,682

edits

Navigation menu