User talk:Lightyears: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reply) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I asked because you check your own edits. First there's a sandbox , then when finished it will be a article and we will link it.[[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 13:05, 23 May 2014 (PDT) | :I asked because you check your own edits. First there's a sandbox , then when finished it will be a article and we will link it.[[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 13:05, 23 May 2014 (PDT) | ||
::Just in case you mean to link to the new article from the scientific errors page, I don't think the link to the article should be put on there (as it's not a scientific error). I just meant that it's fine as a new article. Maybe there are more suitable places to link to it from. If you were to recreate a section on the scientific errors page to put your link to the new article, I'll leave it to others to decide whether to remove it, but I think you'd have to at least write in such a recreated section that this is not strictly a scientific error, but is a theological absurdity/difficulty.[[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 13:22, 23 May 2014 (PDT) | ::Just in case you mean to link to the new article from the scientific errors page, I don't think the link to the article should be put on there (as it's not a scientific error). I just meant that it's fine as a new article. Maybe there are more suitable places to link to it from. If you were to recreate a section on the scientific errors page to put your link to the new article, I'll leave it to others to decide whether to remove it, but I think you'd have to at least write in such a recreated section that this is not strictly a scientific error, but is a theological absurdity/difficulty.[[User:Lightyears|Lightyears]] ([[User talk:Lightyears|talk]]) 13:22, 23 May 2014 (PDT) | ||
:::hi Lightyears yea I'm the administrator but you have as much authority as I do or anyone else. A new page can be made through the help page [http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Help:Contents#How_to_Create_a_New_Page] although I believe the Constellation article is a lower priority. A higher priority for us should be to review the Scientific errors page so we can remove the under review template. | :::hi Lightyears yea I'm the administrator but you have as much authority as I do or anyone else. A new page can be made through the help page [http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Help:Contents#How_to_Create_a_New_Page] although I believe the Constellation article is a lower priority. A higher priority for us should be to review the Scientific errors page so we can remove the under review template. Thanks for some of your edits in trying to fix some of these errors in that article. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 15:54, 23 May 2014 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:55, 23 May 2014
Since you agreed with my take on constellations, how about going ahead with an article on that claim? Will you clear my edits in it when its ready? Saggy (talk) 11:45, 23 May 2014 (PDT)
I do agree on it as a theological issue, so I'd have no issue with an article on that (I think it should mention that it is also a general problem like with continents, mountains taking a long time to form, plants that we eat to evolve etc.). But I've never actually created a new article on here (people have copied a couple of my articles onto here since I made them under the Creative Commons license) so I don't know how or what the protocols are for doing so. I'm sure someone who runs the site (Axius?) could help.Lightyears (talk) 11:53, 23 May 2014 (PDT)
- I asked because you check your own edits. First there's a sandbox , then when finished it will be a article and we will link it.Saggy (talk) 13:05, 23 May 2014 (PDT)
- Just in case you mean to link to the new article from the scientific errors page, I don't think the link to the article should be put on there (as it's not a scientific error). I just meant that it's fine as a new article. Maybe there are more suitable places to link to it from. If you were to recreate a section on the scientific errors page to put your link to the new article, I'll leave it to others to decide whether to remove it, but I think you'd have to at least write in such a recreated section that this is not strictly a scientific error, but is a theological absurdity/difficulty.Lightyears (talk) 13:22, 23 May 2014 (PDT)
- hi Lightyears yea I'm the administrator but you have as much authority as I do or anyone else. A new page can be made through the help page [1] although I believe the Constellation article is a lower priority. A higher priority for us should be to review the Scientific errors page so we can remove the under review template. Thanks for some of your edits in trying to fix some of these errors in that article. --Axius (talk | contribs) 15:54, 23 May 2014 (PDT)
- Just in case you mean to link to the new article from the scientific errors page, I don't think the link to the article should be put on there (as it's not a scientific error). I just meant that it's fine as a new article. Maybe there are more suitable places to link to it from. If you were to recreate a section on the scientific errors page to put your link to the new article, I'll leave it to others to decide whether to remove it, but I think you'd have to at least write in such a recreated section that this is not strictly a scientific error, but is a theological absurdity/difficulty.Lightyears (talk) 13:22, 23 May 2014 (PDT)