User talk:The mystery: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Arabic== Continuing our discussion in email, its a good idea to want to see Arabic on the verses. I fully support it but it would be a huge task to add arabic verses all ove...") |
(→Arabic) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Arabic== | ==Arabic== | ||
Continuing our discussion in email, its a good idea to want to see Arabic on the verses. I fully support it but it would be a huge task to add arabic verses all over the site. We would also have to check copyright of the added images. | Continuing our discussion in email, its a good idea to want to see Arabic on the verses. I fully support it but it would be a huge task to add arabic verses all over the site. We would also have to check copyright of the added images. A second best alternative is to link to a Quran website that has arabic on it but since a long time we have used the usc.edu website. Anyway, its something to think about for later but at this point for consistency reasons it wouldnt be possible to add the verses to some places and not the rest of the site. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] <span style="font-size:88%">([[User_talk:Axius|talk]] <nowiki>|</nowiki> [[Special:Contributions/Axius|contribs]])</span> 12:20, 29 August 2014 (PDT) | ||
:Is it specifically about the inheritance verses? Then only linking the Arabic text will not really benefit. People are not sure how to resolve the mathematical error and they offer conflicting math solutions. (see my talk page) Arabic only gives more ideas to add up the shares eg. the Arabic word for "a child" might mean 1 or many children. the word for "more than two sisters" might mean two and more than two sisters. Whatever the meanings, they wont make the addition consistent. All of them can be covered only in a separate article. As for Arabic use in other articles, there should be preferably a word analysis by some Arabic editor. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 08:06, 30 August 2014 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:06, 30 August 2014
Arabic
Continuing our discussion in email, its a good idea to want to see Arabic on the verses. I fully support it but it would be a huge task to add arabic verses all over the site. We would also have to check copyright of the added images. A second best alternative is to link to a Quran website that has arabic on it but since a long time we have used the usc.edu website. Anyway, its something to think about for later but at this point for consistency reasons it wouldnt be possible to add the verses to some places and not the rest of the site. --Axius (talk | contribs) 12:20, 29 August 2014 (PDT)
- Is it specifically about the inheritance verses? Then only linking the Arabic text will not really benefit. People are not sure how to resolve the mathematical error and they offer conflicting math solutions. (see my talk page) Arabic only gives more ideas to add up the shares eg. the Arabic word for "a child" might mean 1 or many children. the word for "more than two sisters" might mean two and more than two sisters. Whatever the meanings, they wont make the addition consistent. All of them can be covered only in a separate article. As for Arabic use in other articles, there should be preferably a word analysis by some Arabic editor. Saggy (talk) 08:06, 30 August 2014 (PDT)