Template:Pictorial-Islam-options: Difference between revisions

From WikiIslam, the online resource on Islam
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[checked revision][checked revision]
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 81: Line 81:




<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Michael Jackson's alleged conversion to Islam|2=[[File:Jack-1.jpg|230px|link=Michael Jackson (Conversion to Islam)]]|3=Many news sites carried the story that Michael Jackson had converted to Islam in 2008. This was of course seized upon by Muslims and spread through the blogosphere and user-contributed media sites like Youtube.  
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Michael Jackson's alleged conversion to Islam|2=[[File:Jack-1.jpg|270px|link=Michael Jackson (Conversion to Islam)]]|3=Many news sites carried the story that Michael Jackson had converted to Islam in 2008. Muslims then used this for propaganda purposes, spreading it through the blogosphere and user-contributed media sites like Youtube. The source given for this information was usually the New York Post article, however the original source is a notorious tabloid in the UK called "The Sun".


This article refutes all of the proofs that have been offered in support of Michael Jackson's alleged conversion to Islam, thus they must be discarded when researching the claim further. Once this has been done, we are left with nothing. There is absolutely no evidence that Michael Jackson converted to Islam; be it Nation of Islam or otherwise. ([[Michael Jackson (Conversion to Islam)|''read more'']])}}</option>
This article refutes all of the proofs that have been offered in support of Michael Jackson's alleged conversion to Islam, thus they must be discarded when researching the claim further. Once this has been done, we are left with nothing. There is absolutely no evidence that Michael Jackson converted to Islam; be it Nation of Islam or otherwise. ([[Michael Jackson (Conversion to Islam)|''read more'']])}}</option>
Line 99: Line 99:
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Pedophilia in the Qur'an|2=[[File:Women protesters.jpg|250px|link=Pedophilia in the Qur'an]]|3=March 23, 2010: Women protesters hold up copies of the Qur'an outside parliament in Sanaa while stating that a proposed law banning marriages under the age of 17 in Yemen is un-Islamic.
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Pedophilia in the Qur'an|2=[[File:Women protesters.jpg|250px|link=Pedophilia in the Qur'an]]|3=March 23, 2010: Women protesters hold up copies of the Qur'an outside parliament in Sanaa while stating that a proposed law banning marriages under the age of 17 in Yemen is un-Islamic.


The Qur'an in verse 33:49 states that no 'Iddah is prescribed for a woman who has not had intimate contact with her husband, but goes on to stipulate the 'Iddah for pre-pubescent girls in verse 65:4, meaning: the holiest text of Islam supports marrying and having sex with prepubescent girls. This is definitive proof that the Qur'an endorses pedophilia, the most abominable of all sexual crimes. ([[Pedophilia in the Qur'an|''read more'']])}}</option>
The Qur'an in verse 33:49 states that no 'Iddah is prescribed for a woman who has not had intimate contact with her husband, but goes on to stipulate the 'Iddah for pre-pubescent girls in verse 65:4, meaning the holiest text of Islam supports marrying and having sex with prepubescent girls. This is definitive proof that the Qur'an endorses pedophilia, something that is considered by many people to be the most serious of all sexual crimes. ([[Pedophilia in the Qur'an|''read more'']])}}</option>





Revision as of 03:11, 20 April 2013

Also see: Template:Pictorial-Islam

The Rising Star of Incompetent Muslim Science
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination

Many Muslims, especially the younger generation, refer to Dr. Zakir Naik (who believes apostates should be executed), as an expert in the “scientific miracles” of the Qur'an. One obviously would expect that such a great “scientific expert” would actually know a thing or two about science. He once attempted to refute the theory of evolution during the ‘Qur’an and Modern Science – Conflict or Conciliation?’ question and answer session. His entire refutation was rather short, and unsurprisingly received a rapturous applause from his audience. Yet in those few words, Dr. Naik managed to make 28 demonstrable errors of simple fact. This is an astounding level of scientific incompetence. (read more)