WikiIslam talk:Sandbox/Diversity in Islam: Difference between revisions
Prekladator (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I think the 4 Sunni schools and jafari shias cover most of the worlds Muslims. If we get their sources, it will mean 99% of this article's aim is achieved. Jafaris have too many branches it will take too long and too much efforts to do research if we start putting every branch of Jafaris and then look for their sources. But this is a great start. | I think the 4 Sunni schools and jafari shias cover most of the worlds Muslims. If we get their sources, it will mean 99% of this article's aim is achieved. Jafaris have too many branches it will take too long and too much efforts to do research if we start putting every branch of Jafaris and then look for their sources. But this is a great start. | ||
[[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 16:20, 1 April 2017 (EDT) | [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 16:20, 1 April 2017 (EDT) | ||
===Swap=== | |||
swapping columns and rows is still a solution. Besides I would prefer one big table to prove the conclusion instead of many small tables, if they are going to remain incomplete. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 11:33, 11 April 2017 (EDT) | |||
==Ticks and Crosses== | ==Ticks and Crosses== | ||
green tick and blue cross may look better than Yes and No in the table. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 16:32, 1 April 2017 (EDT) | green tick and blue cross may look better than Yes and No in the table. [[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 16:32, 1 April 2017 (EDT) | ||
:: Yes, but two things: Sometimes the answer might get more complicated than yes/no and a textual answer would not fit with those pictures in other cells. (Although I think the answers should be as simple as possible and if they were only two types of answer it would be good). And second, I am not sure if the column would still be sortable. --[[User:Prekladator|Prekladator]] ([[User talk:Prekladator|talk]]) 19:34, 1 April 2017 (EDT) | :: Yes, but two things: Sometimes the answer might get more complicated than yes/no and a textual answer would not fit with those pictures in other cells. (Although I think the answers should be as simple as possible and if they were only two types of answer it would be good). And second, I am not sure if the column would still be sortable. --[[User:Prekladator|Prekladator]] ([[User talk:Prekladator|talk]]) 19:34, 1 April 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:33, 11 April 2017
Columns and Rows
So there are some issues with the columns. We may not find detailed sources for every sect and subsect. Or we may not get their opinions on every topic like homosexuals, rape, jihad, stoning, slavery, witchcraft etc. But its good if we do get them.
I think the 4 Sunni schools and jafari shias cover most of the worlds Muslims. If we get their sources, it will mean 99% of this article's aim is achieved. Jafaris have too many branches it will take too long and too much efforts to do research if we start putting every branch of Jafaris and then look for their sources. But this is a great start. Saggy (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2017 (EDT)
Swap
swapping columns and rows is still a solution. Besides I would prefer one big table to prove the conclusion instead of many small tables, if they are going to remain incomplete. Saggy (talk) 11:33, 11 April 2017 (EDT)
Ticks and Crosses
green tick and blue cross may look better than Yes and No in the table. Saggy (talk) 16:32, 1 April 2017 (EDT)
- Yes, but two things: Sometimes the answer might get more complicated than yes/no and a textual answer would not fit with those pictures in other cells. (Although I think the answers should be as simple as possible and if they were only two types of answer it would be good). And second, I am not sure if the column would still be sortable. --Prekladator (talk) 19:34, 1 April 2017 (EDT)