User:Lehrasap/Sandbox 3
Blasphemy Laws and the Insult of the Opponents by Quran and Muhammad
Those among Muslims, who support the blasphemy laws, brings the argument that blasphemy laws are necessary against insulting prophet Muhammad while it hurts the feeling of billions of Muslims and bring emotional harm to them[1].
While critics bring the counter arguments why freedom to criticise, critique and mock religion is in accordance with the human nature, and has been fundamental to human progress[2][3]. They point out, even Quran and Hadith themselves contain insult and blasphemy against the Non-Muslims.
Perspective of the Supporters of Blasphemy law
In many Islamic countries, insulting Islam or prophet Muhammad is already a crime with punishments, including killing[4]. There is a campaign now to make it also a criminal offence in the western secular world too.
(1) Insulting Muhammad causes unbearable emotional harm to those who love him
UK Parliament Naz Shah urged to criminalise all acts that insult Prophet Muhammad:
(2) Negative comment on Muhammad should be a considered a criminal offense like Holocaust
It is a criminal offence in some European countries to make a negative comment about Holocaust[5]. Prime Minister Imran Khan of Pakistan arguments that negative comment on Muhammad should also be considered a criminal offence like Holocaust.
I call on Western govts who have outlawed any negative comment on the holocaust to use the same standards to penalise those deliberately spreading their message of hate against Muslims by abusing our Prophet.
Perspective of the Critics of Blasphemy law
There is a campaign for repealing the blasphemy laws[6], under which many Western countries have already abolished the blasphemy laws completely in the recent times.
(1) Punishment of an "Oral" Insult could not be any "Physical" Punishment
Critics of blasphemy laws consider the modern Secular laws of the western countries to be in accordance with the Justice, where indeed the punishment of oral insult is present, but this punishment is not "physical", but also "oral".
If someone is cursing you, then the western laws allow you too to curse him back orally, but they don't allow you become physical.
(2) Where there is “Preaching”, there is also “Criticism”
Both preaching and criticism go hand in hand in the western secular law. Everyone is allowed to preach his religion/ideology, but then other is also fully allowed to differ and criticise. Western Secular laws provide with full freedom to preach your religion/ideology, which comes under the right of Freedom of Religion. At the same time, they also provide full freedom to criticise any religion/ideology under the right of Freedom of Expression.
(3) Where there is “Praise”, there is also “Insult”
Critics of the blasphemy laws explains it as under:
While there are Non-Muslims who believe Muhammad to be an evil person, and millions of people were killed due to his false drama of prophethood. And they are hurt and feel emotional harmed when such an evil person (in their opinion) is "praised".
Nevertheless, the western secular system fully allows Muslims to praise Muhammad as much as they want, while the Non-Muslims could not stop them from praising Muhammad, and they have to bear this praise in name of Freedom of Expression and move on.
Similarly, even if Muslims claim they are hurt when someone insults Muhammad, still they could not stop non-Muslims from orally insulting Muhammad. They have to bear this insult and move on.(4) Western Secular Laws are in accordance with the Human Nature:
Critics of the blasphemy laws explain it as under:
Even the writer of Quran and Muhammad showed this exact human nature. When the opponent's didn't accept the prophethood of Muhammad, then the writer of Quran and Muhammad became angry and then they started cursing them several times in Quran and Hadith, and insulting them by equating them to the Donkey, Dogs and the worst of animals and the worst of creatures, and for being filthy, and calling them names (like Abu Jahl) and “bastard” (Arabic: زنیم) and fools and deaf and blind and Kafir.
Quranic Verses which are insulting the opponents
And then we have the tradition from Sahih Bukhari (link) when Abu Bakr abused the ambassador of Quraysh by saying: “Go and such the stinky clitoris of your goddess Laat”, then Prophet Muhammad supported Abu Bakr in saying it by keeping quiet (known as “Hadith-e-Taqriri” in Islamic Sharia).
Note:
The words of Abu Bakr were so dirty that the English Translator of Sahih Bukhari “distorted (تحریف)” the translation and hid the actual abusive words of Abu Bakr: This is pure “dishonesty” to do such distortion.
Arabic words of Abu Bakr are: فَقَالَ لَهُ أَبُو بَكْرٍ امْصُصْ بَظْرَ اللاَّتِ , which means (Abu Bakr said: “Go and suck the stinky clitoris of goddess Laat”)
- ↑ UK Parliament urged to criminalise all acts insulting to Prophet Muhammad
- ↑ Why mocking religion is necessary for human progress! Secularism.Org.
- ↑ Reasons why criticizing and even hating and insulting Muhammad is fully justified
- ↑ Punishment of insulting Islam/Muhammad in the Islamic Countries
- ↑ EU: Holocaust denial in criminal law
- ↑ Campaign for repealing the Blasphemy Laws