Template:Pictorial-Islam-options: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
[checked revision][checked revision]
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 150: Line 150:




<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Wife Beating in Islam|2=[[File:A scene from submission.jpg|210px|link=Wife Beating in Islam]]|3=Wife-beating in the Muslim world comes from the teachings of Islamic religious texts such as the Qur'an and the Hadiths. Because of this, domestic violence has been used as a tool to maintain control and dominance over Muslim women, this has created a patriarchal society where the men rule the women and women are to be submissive. In this article we will explore how wife-beating is promoted in the Qur'an and Hadiths, along with commentary from Muslim scholars, statistics on wife beating in the Muslim world, and common arguments made by Muslims and responses to them. ([[Wife Beating in Islam|''read more'']])}}</option>
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Wife Beating in Islam|2=[[File:A scene from submission.jpg|210px|link=Wife Beating in Islam]]|3=Wife-beating is supported by the teachings of Islamic religious texts such as the Qur'an and the Hadiths. Prophet Muhammad provided tacit approval of wife beating by not scolding Muslims for beating their wives, referred to women who spoke-out against abuse as "not the best among you", forbid Muslims from questioning men who beat their wives, allowed others to hit his wives (the very women whom all Muslims adore and refer to as "the Mother of believers"), reaffirms the command of wife-beating in his parting sermon, and himself struck one of his wives in the chest. In addition to Muhammad's actions, three of the four Rightly-Guided Caliphs also beat women. ([[Wife Beating in Islam|''read more'']])}}</option>




<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=How Islamic inventors did not change the world|2=[[File:20 Islamic inventions.JPG|190px|link=Islamic Inventions? How Islamic Inventors Did Not Change The World]]|3=These past few years have seen many inventions falsely claimed and attributed to Islamic inventors, which in fact either existed in pre-Islamic eras, were invented by other cultures, or both. Such claims have even been forced upon the unsuspecting public in a nationwide tour which opened with an exhibition at the Museum of Science and Industry in Manchester and the University of Manchester, England. To celebrate this 'momentous' series of events, an article titled “How Islamic inventors changed the world” was written by Paul Vallely and published in The Independent. This article lists and examines all twenty of these “Islamic inventors/inventions that changed the world” and in doing so, it exposes the lengths some will sink to in order to appease the Islamists. ([[Islamic Inventions? How Islamic Inventors Did Not Change The World‎|''read more'']])}}</option>
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=How Islamic inventors did not change the world|2=[[File:20 Islamic inventions.JPG|190px|link=Islamic Inventions? How Islamic Inventors Did Not Change The World]]|3=These past few years have seen many inventions falsely claimed and attributed to Islamic inventors, which in fact either existed in pre-Islamic eras, were invented by other cultures, or both. Such claims have even been forced upon the unsuspecting public in a nationwide tour which opened with an exhibition at the Museum of Science and Industry in Manchester and the University of Manchester, England. To celebrate this series of events, an article titled “How Islamic inventors changed the world” was written by Paul Vallely and published in The Independent. This article lists and examines all twenty of these “Islamic inventors/inventions that changed the world”, and in doing so, it will reveal their actual inventors and the true role of Islam/Muslims, if any, behind the inventions. ([[Islamic Inventions? How Islamic Inventors Did Not Change The World‎|''read more'']])}}</option>




<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Muhammad and History's 100 Most Influential People‎|2=[[File:The 100 A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History.jpg|190px|link=Muhammad and History's 100 Most Influential People]]|3=In 1978 Jewish American astrophysicist Michael H. Hart (born April 28, 1932) released a book titled "The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History". This book, which has sold over 500,000 copies to date, has been somewhat controversial, not least due to its placing of Muhammad (the founder of Islam) over Jesus Christ (the founder of Christianity). This has unsurprisingly led to the list being used for the purpose of Islamic propaganda. Its choice of Muhammad as the most influential person in history has been, and still is being, celebrated on numerous Islamic websites and blogs, used in various videos on user-contributed media sites, and has been cited during the course of countless forum discussions. Hopefully any Muslim that reads this article will ponder the following; what exactly do they (as followers of Islam) consider so great about a Jewish American “Islamophobe's” opinion that an individual who he refers to as a “conqueror” ranked alongside Adolf Hitler is the most influential (not 'greatest') person in human history? ([[Muhammad and History's 100 Most Influential People‎|''read more'']])}}</option>
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Muhammad and History's 100 Most Influential People‎|2=[[File:The 100 A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History.jpg|190px|link=Muhammad and History's 100 Most Influential People]]|3=In 1978 Jewish American astrophysicist Michael H. Hart (born April 28, 1932) released a book titled "The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History". This book, which has sold over 500,000 copies to date, has been somewhat controversial, not least due to its placing of Muhammad (the founder of Islam) over Jesus Christ (the founder of Christianity). This has led to the list being used for the purpose of Islamic propaganda. Its choice of Muhammad as the most influential person in history has been, and still is being, celebrated on numerous Islamic websites and blogs, used in various videos on user-contributed media sites, and has been cited during the course of countless forum discussions. Hopefully any Muslim that reads this article will ponder the following; what exactly do they (as followers of Islam) consider so great about a Jewish American racist “Islamophobe's” opinion that an individual who he refers to as a “conqueror” ranked alongside Adolf Hitler is temporarily the most influential (not 'greatest') person in human history? ([[Muhammad and History's 100 Most Influential People‎|''read more'']])}}</option>




<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Muslims Caught Using Deception‎|2=[[File:Muslims Taqiyya.JPG|190px|link=Muslims Caught Using Deception]]|3=Religiously, Muslims are permitted to lie or use deception if it is used to further the cause of Islam. This is generally referred to as Taqiyya. It is most often used to distort Islamic teachings, and also in the attempt to deceive people into believing that they are being persecuted for their faith in the West. This is particularly important to some Muslims, hoping to paint the persecutor as the persecuted and shifting focus away from the millions who face real persecution at the hands of Islam. It is also useful in creating an atmosphere of fear among the general Muslim population, gaining the sympathy of the West, and shaming vocal critics of Islam into silence. The most troubling aspect of Muslims "crying wolf" is not the extra cost to the tax-payers for wasted police time, resources etc., but the fact that the lives of many innocent non-Muslims would be, and no doubt have been, destroyed if the Muslim claims are believed. ([[Muslims Caught Using Deception‎|''read more'']])}}</option>
<option weight="1">{{Pictorial-Islam|1=Muslims Caught Using Deception‎|2=[[File:Hatecrimes.JPG|190px|link=Muslims Caught Using Deception]]|3=According to Islam's religious texts, Muslims are permitted to lie or use deception if it is used to further the cause of Islam. This is often incorrectly referred to as Taqiyya. Lying is most often used to distort Islamic teachings, and also in the attempt to deceive people into believing that they are being persecuted around the world for their faith. This is particularly important to some Muslims, hoping to paint the persecutor as the persecuted and shifting focus away from the millions who face real persecution at the hands of Islam. It is also useful in creating an atmosphere of fear among the general Muslim population, gaining the sympathy of the West, and shaming vocal critics of Islam into silence. The most troubling aspect of Muslims "crying wolf" is not the extra cost to the tax-payers for wasted police time, resources etc., but the fact that the lives of many innocent non-Muslims would be, and no doubt have been, destroyed if their claims are believed. ([[Muslims Caught Using Deception‎|''read more'']])}}</option>




48,466

edits