Autochecked users, Bureaucrats, Editors, oversight, recentchangescleanup, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
19,746
edits
User talk:Saggy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Scientific Errors
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Got it. Got mistake. Thanks. (Or u want me to stop doing anything until we complete discussing?)[[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 02:53, 10 January 2014 (PST) | Got it. Got mistake. Thanks. (Or u want me to stop doing anything until we complete discussing?)[[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 02:53, 10 January 2014 (PST) | ||
:No, that's fine. Thanks. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 11:42, 10 January 2014 (PST) | :No, that's fine. Thanks. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 11:42, 10 January 2014 (PST) | ||
hi Saggy, this Science error/Quran page is popular and is often linked to by people so its important for this page to be as strong as possible. Some errors are more obvious than others. Some only appear in one translation and so on. For example the Golden Calf statue verse that you added was great. It obviously goes against science and is a glaring error while some others are not that obvious. | |||
One idea I have is to keep the strongest errors at the top and the less obvious ones (or the ones that can be explained in some way by apologists) near the bottom in another section. I tried making some rules here: [[Talk:Scientific Errors in the Qur'an]] (draft). Let me know your thoughts. --[[User:Axius|Axius]] ([[User talk:Axius|talk]]) 08:19, 1 February 2014 (PST) | |||