48,466
edits
[checked revision] | [checked revision] |
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
{{Quote||… from the perspective of logic, if the fly did not carry some sort of protection in the form of an antidote or immunity, it would perish from its own poisonous burden and there would be no fly left in the world.}} | {{Quote||… from the perspective of logic, if the fly did not carry some sort of protection in the form of an antidote or immunity, it would perish from its own poisonous burden and there would be no fly left in the world.}} | ||
Flies do not succumb to human pathogens – they are merely carriers. This shows that those who make these claims do not understand pathogenesis. Flies do not succumb to human diseases. | |||
The way it works is | The way it works is as follows: | ||
*Fly lands on feces or rotting carcass – | *Fly lands on feces or rotting carcass – transfers traces of feces or rotting carcass onto itself. | ||
*Fly lands on human food – | *Fly lands on human food – transfers traces of feces or rotting carcass onto human food. | ||
*Fly flies away – human consumes contaminated food and | *Fly flies away – human consumes contaminated food and becomes sick. | ||
*Fly continues on | *Fly continues on as normal, free to repeat the cycle again. | ||
C. They falsely assume relations that do not exist. | C. They falsely assume relations that do not exist. |
edits