48,466
edits
User talk:PW. Jansen: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→New additions/reviews: I missed the insinuation made here
m (→New additions/reviews: I missed the insinuation made here) |
|||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
:::::One page (Zakat) had a particular point to make (about non-Muslims and terrorism) and your suggestion of having all the mundane verses mentioned simply to point out the fact that Allah (aka Prophet Muhammad) asked often for money, and rarely for good causes, would have buried it underneath something that belongs in an essay. The other page (scientific errors) is meant as a quick and easy-to-read list of errors that can lead off to more in-depth pages. Making them "complete" with all verses, even tafsir, hadith etc. as some editors have tried, would leave the list no longer "quick and easy-to-read." | :::::One page (Zakat) had a particular point to make (about non-Muslims and terrorism) and your suggestion of having all the mundane verses mentioned simply to point out the fact that Allah (aka Prophet Muhammad) asked often for money, and rarely for good causes, would have buried it underneath something that belongs in an essay. The other page (scientific errors) is meant as a quick and easy-to-read list of errors that can lead off to more in-depth pages. Making them "complete" with all verses, even tafsir, hadith etc. as some editors have tried, would leave the list no longer "quick and easy-to-read." | ||
:::::Yeah, I'm still not seeing how my answers were "more or less" the same, unless you're referring to the fact that I basically said "no" to both suggestions. We do not "simply disagree." I've fully explained why your ideas are wrong for this site. | :::::Yeah, I'm still not seeing how my answers were "more or less" the same, unless you're referring to the fact that I basically said "no" to both suggestions. We do not "simply disagree." I've fully explained why your ideas are wrong for this site. And it is not an issue of ''standards''. I can assure you that no one sets standards higher here than I do. It is a matter of appropriateness, style, usefulness, intent and a whole lot of other factors. | ||
:::::Concerning your translation query, if the quoted translation is one of the three, then there is no need to mention it at all. That verse you quoted is pretty much the same across all three. If there does happen to be a massive difference in meaning for a certain verse, then it's probably best to bring the issue up with Axius. [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 04:43, 9 September 2014 (PDT) | :::::Concerning your translation query, if the quoted translation is one of the three, then there is no need to mention it at all. That verse you quoted is pretty much the same across all three. If there does happen to be a massive difference in meaning for a certain verse, then it's probably best to bring the issue up with Axius. [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 04:43, 9 September 2014 (PDT) | ||