Embryology in the Quran: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Conclusion: updated to reflect the rewrite of the page with better arguments and without the bad arguments
[checked revision][checked revision]
(→‎Conclusion: updated to reflect the rewrite of the page with better arguments and without the bad arguments)
Line 303: Line 303:
Qur'anic Embryology can be seen to be false due to the following points:  
Qur'anic Embryology can be seen to be false due to the following points:  


1. The Qur'an itself omits mention of the ovum in human reproduction, with doctrinal evidence that it regards the progeny to be the resulting union between the seed from the male parent and the female parent as tilth. As tilth do not provide genetic material to the seed, it is clear that the Qur'an regards the nutfah (semen) as the diploid seed. Moreover, the choice of the words nutfah (small amount of liquid) and maa' maheenin (water/liquid disdained) in key passages indicate a belief that the embryo is formed out of semen, with no knowledge of the sperm cell.
# The Qur'an itself omits mention of the ovum in human reproduction. Moreover, the choice of the words nutfah (small amount of liquid) and maa' maheenin (water/liquid disdained), which are placed in a safe place (the womb) in key passages indicate a belief that the embryo is formed out of semen, with no knowledge of the sperm cell.  


2. The Qur'an includes an initial dust stage that cannot be reconciled with modern embryology.  
# The word 'alaqah probably means blood clot, which corresponds to no actual embryological stage. Even if this was not the intended meaning, the foolishness of using a word with such an explicit biological meaning in a description of a biological process (embryology) means that the Qur'an can not be divine in origin.


3. The missing stages of verse 40:67 contradict the other embryology verses.
4. The stages of bone formation then clothing with flesh is in error, even assuming that 'itham means both bone and cartilage.  
 
4. The stages of bone formation then clothing with flesh is in error, even assuming that izhaam means both bone and cartilage.  


5. The Qur'anic view of cell differentiation at the Mudgha stage is incorrect, as modern embryology has discovered cell differentiation occurring before and after the putative ‘Mudgha’ stage.  
5. The Qur'anic view of cell differentiation at the Mudgha stage is incorrect, as modern embryology has discovered cell differentiation occurring before and after the putative ‘Mudgha’ stage.  
Line 315: Line 313:
6. The claim that the Qur'an correctly predicted the beginning of the fetal stage is shown to be in error because the transition between the embryo and the fetus is arbitrary.  
6. The claim that the Qur'an correctly predicted the beginning of the fetal stage is shown to be in error because the transition between the embryo and the fetus is arbitrary.  


7. The claim that the Qur'an correctly states the least period of conception at 24 weeks is in error, as according to modern medical knowledge this period is closer to 21-22 weeks or even less with advanced medical science, and at least 30 weeks without modern medical assistance.  
7. The claim that the Qur'an correctly states the least period of conception at 24 weeks is in error, as according to modern medical knowledge this period is closer to 21-22 weeks or even less with advanced medical science, and at least 30 weeks without modern medical assistance. Similarly, other apologetic claims regarding sperm, the womb, and gender determination are disproved by other verses and scientific knowledge.


{{Core Science}}
{{Core Science}}
Editors, em-bypass-2, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
2,743

edits

Navigation menu