36
edits
mNo edit summary |
Truthseeker (talk | contribs) (response to Sahabah) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--[[User:Truthseeker|Truthseeker]] ([[User talk:Truthseeker|talk]]) 13:58, 12 August 2013 (PDT) | --[[User:Truthseeker|Truthseeker]] ([[User talk:Truthseeker|talk]]) 13:58, 12 August 2013 (PDT) | ||
:Hi TS. Nice to have you back. I'll sort it out in while. There won't be any need to rearrange anything. I'll have to delete that online one and cite the hard copy on the hadith above it. ATM, we have both there already. It looks like one editor was reading a hard copy and the other the online version. Thanks. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 17:26, 12 August 2013 (PDT) | :Hi TS. Nice to have you back. I'll sort it out in while. There won't be any need to rearrange anything. I'll have to delete that online one and cite the hard copy on the hadith above it. ATM, we have both there already. It looks like one editor was reading a hard copy and the other the online version. Thanks. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 17:26, 12 August 2013 (PDT) | ||
::Thanks. I think perhaps a picture of page 57 could contribute. And perhaps (but this is just a suggestion) the clear attempt to hide the meaning by corrupting the hadith, might be something we would be interested in to expose. Muslims often accuse other religions of having corrupted scripture. Well, since their Sahih Hadith is considered scripture to them and they clearly change around the words and meanings on sahih-bukhari.com and other webistes, like the Quran accuses others of doing, we can expose them for that. | |||
[[User:Truthseeker|Truthseeker]] ([[User talk:Truthseeker|talk]]) 08:12, 13 August 2013 (PDT) |