48,466
edits
User talk:Atheistig: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I've tried to improve the clarity of some of the comments including grammar and remove any arrogant or overtly condescending language. I'm also attempting to consolidate similar sections to reduce the size of the outline and put related content and references together. I did remove a handful of minor points that were either weaker arguments or completely off topic. This included Quran references that had no explanation as to why it was an error (and it wasn't readily evident from the text itself) or were weak (i.e "The Sun is not a star" section shows a verse that itemized the sun separately from stars but this doesn't imply the sun is '''not''' a star). In effect, I'm trying to improve quality over quantity. There's a ton of information on that article, some of it good some of it bad, and I think improving the good points (including adding reference and refutations to common apologist counter-claims) and removing the bad ones will improve the overall readability and information of that page. I only updated less than 10% of the article and was hoping to improve other sections as well including rewriting the comments and reorganizing some points (like evolution) to be in the biology section, etc. --[[User:Atheistig|Atheistig]] ([[User talk:Atheistig|talk]]) 08:42, 14 November 2013 (PST) | I've tried to improve the clarity of some of the comments including grammar and remove any arrogant or overtly condescending language. I'm also attempting to consolidate similar sections to reduce the size of the outline and put related content and references together. I did remove a handful of minor points that were either weaker arguments or completely off topic. This included Quran references that had no explanation as to why it was an error (and it wasn't readily evident from the text itself) or were weak (i.e "The Sun is not a star" section shows a verse that itemized the sun separately from stars but this doesn't imply the sun is '''not''' a star). In effect, I'm trying to improve quality over quantity. There's a ton of information on that article, some of it good some of it bad, and I think improving the good points (including adding reference and refutations to common apologist counter-claims) and removing the bad ones will improve the overall readability and information of that page. I only updated less than 10% of the article and was hoping to improve other sections as well including rewriting the comments and reorganizing some points (like evolution) to be in the biology section, etc. --[[User:Atheistig|Atheistig]] ([[User talk:Atheistig|talk]]) 08:42, 14 November 2013 (PST) | ||
:Okay. Thanks for your reply. As a rule, edits by new users have to be checked, but please carry on. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 08:50, 14 November 2013 (PST) | :Okay. Thanks for your reply. As a rule, edits by new users have to be checked, but please carry on. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 08:50, 14 November 2013 (PST) | ||
::I would like to add that separate problems such as "Humans created from clay" or "Fall from paradise down to the earth" should keep their headings (although you can alter what exactly those headings are). The reason for this is that each problem should be easy to find via the contents list. Currently I notice that you have removed several headings. [[User:Sahabah|--Sahabah]] ([[User talk:Sahabah|talk]]) 08:57, 14 November 2013 (PST) | |||