Muhammads Miracles: Difference between revisions
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
Lightyears (talk | contribs) (Automated script replacing USC-MSA hadith numbering system for Bukhari, Muslim, and Abu Dawud) |
Zhothaqquah (talk | contribs) (Revised language) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{QualityScore|Lead=1|Structure=2|Content=2|Language=2|References=2}} | {{QualityScore|Lead=1|Structure=2|Content=2|Language=2|References=2}} | ||
This article | This article examines the Islamic belief of [[Muhammad]]'s ability to perform [[Islam and Miracles|miracles]]. | ||
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
The hadith record that Muhammad denied being able to perform miracles, and the Qur'an states that he had maintained this denial when confronted by critics. Some suggest that Muhammad's only miracle was the revelation of the Qur'an, but other purported miracles, such as the so-called "[[Moon Split Miracle|Moon splitting miracle]]," are referenced in the Qur'an and endorsed in hadith literature. Some of the miracles alleged to occur in Muhammad's life share great similarities with miracle stories from [[People of the Book|earlier faiths]], and the Qur'an itself has a richly-documented [[Textual History of the Qur'an|textual history]], along with [[Contradictions in the Quran|claims of dubious reliability.]] | |||
==Miracles== | ==Miracles== | ||
| Line 45: | Line 41: | ||
===Bukhari's criteria=== | ===Bukhari's criteria=== | ||
When | When determining [[sahih]] [[hadith]] narrations, the burden of proof is on the person who claims a certain narration is not authentic to provide the [[Daleel|evidence]] for its inauthenticity. | ||
Imam Bukhari | Imam Bukhari developed three criteria to determine whether a narration was sahih. His third criteria regards ''mat'n'' (text), i.e. the text/content of a narration must not contradict the Qur'an. The only exception to this rule is narrations regarded as ''Qudsi'', or narrations which contain non-Qur'anic words from Allah. | ||
====Hadith Evidence==== | ====Hadith Evidence==== | ||
The hadith record that Muhammad, when challenged by skeptics, denied being able to perform any miracles. He admitted that although other prophets before him could perform miracles, his only miracle was the Qur'an: | |||
{{Quote|{{Bukhari|||7274|darussalam}}|Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, "There was no prophet among the prophets but was given miracles because of which people had security or had belief, but what I was given was the Divine Inspiration which Allah revealed to me. So I hope that my followers will be more than those of any other prophet on the Day of Resurrection."}} | {{Quote|{{Bukhari|||7274|darussalam}}|Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, "There was no prophet among the prophets but was given miracles because of which people had security or had belief, but what I was given was the Divine Inspiration which Allah revealed to me. So I hope that my followers will be more than those of any other prophet on the Day of Resurrection."}} | ||
| Line 57: | Line 53: | ||
====Qur'anic Evidence==== | ====Qur'anic Evidence==== | ||
Muhammad acknowledges in the following verse that other prophets before him came with miracles or clear signs but were still rejected, demonstrating the futility of miracles as proof of revelation: | |||
{{Quote|{{Quran|3|138}}|They (also) said: "Allah took our promise not to believe in an messenger unless He showed us a sacrifice consumed by Fire (From heaven)." Say: "There came to you messengers before me, with clear Signs and even with what ye ask for: why then did ye slay them, if ye speak the truth?" if you are truthful?}} | {{Quote|{{Quran|3|138}}|They (also) said: "Allah took our promise not to believe in an messenger unless He showed us a sacrifice consumed by Fire (From heaven)." Say: "There came to you messengers before me, with clear Signs and even with what ye ask for: why then did ye slay them, if ye speak the truth?" if you are truthful?}} | ||
In another verse, nonbelievers asked Muhammad to perform a miracle so that they too could believe. | |||
{{Quote|{{Quran|17|90}}|They say: "We shall not believe in thee, until thou cause a spring to gush forth for us from the earth,}} | {{Quote|{{Quran|17|90}}|They say: "We shall not believe in thee, until thou cause a spring to gush forth for us from the earth,}} | ||
| Line 68: | Line 64: | ||
{{Quote|{{Quran|17|93}}|Say: "Glory to my Lord! Am I aught but a man,- a messenger?"}} | {{Quote|{{Quran|17|93}}|Say: "Glory to my Lord! Am I aught but a man,- a messenger?"}} | ||
According to the Qur'an, | According to the Qur'an, Muhammad was doubted due to his seeming lack of extraordinary or miraculous characteristics: | ||
{{Quote|{{Quran|17|94}}|And naught prevented mankind from believing when the guidance came unto them save that they said: Hath Allah sent a mortal as (His) messenger?}} | {{Quote|{{Quran|17|94}}|And naught prevented mankind from believing when the guidance came unto them save that they said: Hath Allah sent a mortal as (His) messenger?}} | ||
| Line 78: | Line 74: | ||
{{Quote|{{Quran|17|95}}|Say: Had there been in the earth angels walking about as settlers, We would certainly have sent down to them from the heaven an angel as a messenger.}} | {{Quote|{{Quran|17|95}}|Say: Had there been in the earth angels walking about as settlers, We would certainly have sent down to them from the heaven an angel as a messenger.}} | ||
Another verse records another instance where miracles are requested of Muhammad: | |||
{{Quote|{{Quran|15|6}}|Why do you not bring to us the angels if you are of the truthful ones?}} | {{Quote|{{Quran|15|6}}|Why do you not bring to us the angels if you are of the truthful ones?}} | ||
| Line 96: | Line 84: | ||
“And the Unbelievers say: "Why is not a sign sent down to him from his Lord?" But thou art truly a warner, and to every people a guide.”}} | “And the Unbelievers say: "Why is not a sign sent down to him from his Lord?" But thou art truly a warner, and to every people a guide.”}} | ||
The Quraishites continued | The Quraishites continued asked for a sign or a miracle to believe, but Muhammad repeated that he was only a warner: | ||
{{Quote|{{Quran|13|7}}|“And the Unbelievers say: "Why is not a sign sent down to him from his Lord?" But thou art truly a warner, and to every people a guide.”}} | {{Quote|{{Quran|13|7}}|“And the Unbelievers say: "Why is not a sign sent down to him from his Lord?" But thou art truly a warner, and to every people a guide.”}} | ||
The following verse seems to suggest that miracles are insufficient grounds for prophethood, since magicians can achieve feats that resemble miracles: | |||
The following | |||
{{Quote|{{Quran|2|3}}|Their hearts toying as with trifles. The wrong-doers conceal their private counsels, (saying), "Is this (one) more than a man like yourselves? Will ye go to witchcraft with your eyes open?"}} | {{Quote|{{Quran|2|3}}|Their hearts toying as with trifles. The wrong-doers conceal their private counsels, (saying), "Is this (one) more than a man like yourselves? Will ye go to witchcraft with your eyes open?"}}These verses, which consistently deny Muhammad's ability to perform miracles, stand in sharp contrast to hadith which record Muhammad's purported miracles. | ||
==== Modern Historian Views of Quran Verse 54:1 ==== | ==== Modern Historian Views of Quran Verse 54:1 ==== | ||
Many modern academics view the moon splitting verse in the Qur'an | Many modern academics view the moon splitting verse in the Qur'an as a natural astronomical phenomenon that may have occurred during the time of Muhammad, which Muhammad took as an omen of significance. Similar beliefs appear in antique Christian, Jewish, and Zoroastrian writings,<ref>For examples of this in Christian, Jewish and Zoroastrianism literature in the centuries preceding Islam, see Shoemaker, Stephen J. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv16t6jmh. ''The Apocalypse of Empire: Imperial Eschatology in Late Antiquity and Early Islam.''] University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018. ''Chapters 1 - 4'' | ||
For Muslim's similar beliefs in early Islam, see ''Chapters 5 and 6''.</ref> which later commentators and biographers | For Muslim's similar beliefs in early Islam, see ''Chapters 5 and 6''.</ref> accounts of which later commentators and biographers may have exaggerated as a literal, miraculous splitting. Uri Rubin and Rudi Paret, for example, suggest it was a partial lunar eclipse,<ref>''Muhammad’s message in Mecca: warnings, signs, and miracles [The case of the splitting of the moon (Q 54:1-2)].'' Uri Rubin in Jonathan E. Brockopp, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Muhammad (Cambridge, 2010), 39-60. Noting Rudi Paret's opinion in footnote 9 pp. 44. | ||
</ref> while David Cook notes it may have been a comet.<ref>Shoemaker, Stephen J.. The Death of a Prophet ''(Divinations: Rereading Late Ancient Religion) (p. 161).'' University of Pennsylvania Press, Inc.. Kindle Edition. </ref> | </ref> while David Cook notes it may have been a comet.<ref>Shoemaker, Stephen J.. The Death of a Prophet ''(Divinations: Rereading Late Ancient Religion) (p. 161).'' University of Pennsylvania Press, Inc.. Kindle Edition. </ref> | ||
Revision as of 22:10, 24 November 2025
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
| This article or section is being renovated. Lead = 1 / 4
Structure = 2 / 4
Content = 2 / 4
Language = 2 / 4
References = 2 / 4
|
This article examines the Islamic belief of Muhammad's ability to perform miracles.
Introduction
The hadith record that Muhammad denied being able to perform miracles, and the Qur'an states that he had maintained this denial when confronted by critics. Some suggest that Muhammad's only miracle was the revelation of the Qur'an, but other purported miracles, such as the so-called "Moon splitting miracle," are referenced in the Qur'an and endorsed in hadith literature. Some of the miracles alleged to occur in Muhammad's life share great similarities with miracle stories from earlier faiths, and the Qur'an itself has a richly-documented textual history, along with claims of dubious reliability.
Miracles
Moon Splitting Miracle
And if they see a miracle they turn aside and say: Transient magic.
And they call (it) a lie, and follow their low desires; and every affair has its appointed term.Syed Abu-Ala' Maududi
Water Creation Miracle
Multiplied Bread Miracle
Analysis
Bukhari's criteria
When determining sahih hadith narrations, the burden of proof is on the person who claims a certain narration is not authentic to provide the evidence for its inauthenticity.
Imam Bukhari developed three criteria to determine whether a narration was sahih. His third criteria regards mat'n (text), i.e. the text/content of a narration must not contradict the Qur'an. The only exception to this rule is narrations regarded as Qudsi, or narrations which contain non-Qur'anic words from Allah.
Hadith Evidence
The hadith record that Muhammad, when challenged by skeptics, denied being able to perform any miracles. He admitted that although other prophets before him could perform miracles, his only miracle was the Qur'an:
Qur'anic Evidence
Muhammad acknowledges in the following verse that other prophets before him came with miracles or clear signs but were still rejected, demonstrating the futility of miracles as proof of revelation:
In another verse, nonbelievers asked Muhammad to perform a miracle so that they too could believe.
And he would reply:
According to the Qur'an, Muhammad was doubted due to his seeming lack of extraordinary or miraculous characteristics:
Muhammad maintained that he was just an ordinary man, not an angel, meaning people should not expect miracles from him:
Another verse records another instance where miracles are requested of Muhammad:
To this, Muhammad responded:
The Quraishites continued asked for a sign or a miracle to believe, but Muhammad repeated that he was only a warner:
The following verse seems to suggest that miracles are insufficient grounds for prophethood, since magicians can achieve feats that resemble miracles:
These verses, which consistently deny Muhammad's ability to perform miracles, stand in sharp contrast to hadith which record Muhammad's purported miracles.
Modern Historian Views of Quran Verse 54:1
Many modern academics view the moon splitting verse in the Qur'an as a natural astronomical phenomenon that may have occurred during the time of Muhammad, which Muhammad took as an omen of significance. Similar beliefs appear in antique Christian, Jewish, and Zoroastrian writings,[1] accounts of which later commentators and biographers may have exaggerated as a literal, miraculous splitting. Uri Rubin and Rudi Paret, for example, suggest it was a partial lunar eclipse,[2] while David Cook notes it may have been a comet.[3]
...In the spirit of this awareness, the reality of the ‘drawing near hour’ is affirmed in v. 1. This happens for the first time through an empirically observed natural phenomenon: a ‘moon splitting,’ perhaps a lunar eclipse, if one wishes to follow Rubin (2010) with the interpretation of the word in the sense of a poetic-pictorial dressing of the well-known phenomenon. The listeners are familiar with such changes in the celestial bodies from the eschatological predictions clothed in so-called idhā series (see the text type SKMS, 188ff.). Thus a change in the moon in Q 75:8 stands in the context of an eschatological scene. The short sentence Q 75:7–13 rhymes with the same schema 3Car as Q 54, it is obviously evoked here. In Q 75 the ‘disappearance’ of the moon is followed by the prediction of a merging of the sun and moon and finally the projection of the last day... ...A phenomenon known from apocalyptic literature as a sign of the end of the world, which had already been part of the proclamation, is explained as being present in the now: the change in a celestial body has now actually occurred; so the “hour” is near. However, this upgrading of the natural phenomenon was met with ridicule from the opponents...
..As Bell (1939: 544ff.) and Paret (KKK, 495) have already emphasized, v. 1 is about a natural event that may have actually taken place at the time of the Meccan proclamation. The interpretation of iqtarabat (and inshaqqat) as “Perfectum propheticum,” as an indication of a future event, which older translators advocate (cf. Blachère 1949: 140ff.), is anachronistic, obviously owing its origins to Islamic tradition. It occurs because the “sign” of the splitting of the moon, which according to a hadith of Ibn Masʿūd was observed by Masʿūd himself and therefore had early relevance in the biography of the prophet, could no longer function as an eschatological sign that had already occurred, as the associated announcement of the imminent end of the world had not come true. It was now understood by some as a mere prediction of an apparition, by others as a sign actually wrought by the prophet himself, a confirming miracle (see Andrae 1918: 55–57; Schimmel 1985: 69–71; and especially Rubin 2010; for the discussions of the theologians who, like al-Naẓẓām [d. 844/845], had to deal with the nonfulfillment of the prediction of the end of the world, see van Ess 1992: 415ff. and 1995: 167ff.).See Also
- Muhammad's Revelations - A hub page that leads to other articles related to Muhammad's Revelations
- ↑ For examples of this in Christian, Jewish and Zoroastrianism literature in the centuries preceding Islam, see Shoemaker, Stephen J. The Apocalypse of Empire: Imperial Eschatology in Late Antiquity and Early Islam. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018. Chapters 1 - 4 For Muslim's similar beliefs in early Islam, see Chapters 5 and 6.
- ↑ Muhammad’s message in Mecca: warnings, signs, and miracles [The case of the splitting of the moon (Q 54:1-2)]. Uri Rubin in Jonathan E. Brockopp, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Muhammad (Cambridge, 2010), 39-60. Noting Rudi Paret's opinion in footnote 9 pp. 44.
- ↑ Shoemaker, Stephen J.. The Death of a Prophet (Divinations: Rereading Late Ancient Religion) (p. 161). University of Pennsylvania Press, Inc.. Kindle Edition.