WikiIslam

Prophecies in the Quran: Difference between revisions

Page Discussion

Prophecies in the Quran (view source)

Revision as of 00:42, 5 December 2025

41,990 bytes added ,  00:42
no edit summary
[checked revision][checked revision]
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{QualityScore|Lead=2|Structure=3|Content=3|Language=2|References=3}}
{{QualityScore|Lead=3|Structure=3|Content=4|Language=4|References=4}}
There are many websites and resources cropping up claiming that the Qur'an contains many prophecies that have been fulfilled due to the advancement of knowledge of our universe and advances in modern life. However all of the claims examined so far show that, using hindsight, some apologists are taking one verse, or a partial verse; or even a loose translation of the Qur'an out of context in order to twist the words to find prophetic statements within. This is to say that they may take some of our current knowledge, ie. airplane technology, and then search for a Qur'an verse or a partial verse, and twist it to make it 'fit'. Many of these claims of prophecy are incorrect; disproven in fact by their own experts on the Qur'an or the verses themselves, when read in context.
 
A major theme in the Quran are prophecies of an eschatalogical nature, i.e. concerning the last day. In Surah al-Rum ("The Romans"), there is also a prophecy concerning contemporary military-political events, which at that time were also seen in a broader eschatological context, and has been of considerable interest to academic scholars.
 
==The Romans (Byzantines) have been defeated in the nearest land - Quran 30:2-7==
 
{{Quote|{{Quran-range|30|2|7}}|(2) The Roman Empire has been defeated-<BR />
(3) In a land close by; but they, (even) after (this) defeat of theirs, will soon be victorious-<BR />
(4) Within a few years. With Allah is the Decision, in the past and in the Future: on that Day shall the Believers rejoice-<BR />
(5) With the help of Allah. He helps whom He will, and He is exalted in might, most merciful.<BR />
(6) (It is) the promise of Allah. Never does Allah depart from His promise: but most men understand not.<BR />
(7) They know but the outer (things) in the life of this world: but of the End of things they are heedless.}}
 
This famous Quranic passage does not mention the Persians (Sasanids), though it was understood in tafsir (commentary) tradition to be a reference to the long-running war between the Byzantines (Romans) and their Sasanian (Persian) imperial rivals. Given the importance of their rivalry, often a topic of prophecy in late antiquity, it is perhaps unsurprising that a prophet would be expected to comment on the situation.
 
In 614 CE, the Sasanids captured Jerusalem from the Byzantine empire, a moment of great dispair for the Christian world and seems to be the defeat mentioned in Q. 30:2. In 622 CE the Byzantines had a significant victory over the Sasanids in Anatolia, modern Turkey. This marked the end of the first stage of the war and is commonly claimed to be the fulfilment of the prophecy. Fighting continued, with the Romans increasingly successful. The end of the war came in 628 CE when the Byzantine emperor Heraclius accepted the surrender of the Sasanids, regained Jerusalem and returned to that holy city the relic of the "true cross" which the Sasanids had taken as spoils of war during their conquest of Jerusalem 14 years earlier (see [[w:Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628|Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628]]).
 
The Arabic word translated "a few" years in verse 4 is ''biḍ'ʿi'', which traditionally and in Arabic dictionaries indicates a range of three to nine (though there is significant doubt about this definition, discussed below). Three to nine years would fit the eight year gap between the capture of Jerusalem and the Byzantine victory under Heraclius in Anatolia, though critics sometimes point out that this was by no means the end of the war.
 
That did not come until some years later in 628 CE, fourteen years after Jerusalem was captured in 614 CE; Jerusalem itself was only recovered to great rejoicing in 629 CE under the peace treaty. Rather, Anatolia marked what turned out to be a turning point in Byzantine fortunes. Indeed, the prophecy most likely is an attempt to predict a conclusive victory that ends the war rather than an intermediate battle. As set out below, wars between these two sides were often the topic of prophecies in late antique eschatalogical tradition, in which the final victory of the Romans (Byzantines) over the Persians was seen as an apocalyptic prelude to the end times.
 
===Apocalyptic prophecies of a final Byzantine victory in late antiquity===
In his article, '' 'The Romans Will Win!' Q 30:2‒7 in Light of 7th c. Political Eschatology'', academic scholar Tommaso Tesei demonstrates that there were a number of similar contemporary Christian prophecies about the Byzantine-Sasanid war with an ultimate victory for the Romans.<ref name="Tesei2018">Tommaso Tesei (2018) [https://www.academia.edu/36263369 'The Romans Will Win!' Q 30:2‒7 in Light of 7th c. Political Eschatology.], Der Islam 2018; 95 (1): 1–29</ref> These are framed in an eschatological context, with the final victory commencing a glorious period in prelude to the apocalypse. He writes, "the opening verses of sūrat al-Rūm bear a striking resemblance to prophecies circulating in the Middle East at the time when the Qurʾānic passage purportedly was formulated."
 
For example, he writes that "In a passage of the ''History of Maurice'', composed by Theophylact Simocatta during the reign of Heraclius (r. 610–641 CE), the author reports a prophecy attributed to the Sasanian sovereign Khosrow II." Tesei's quote from this passage includes the following lines:
 
{{Quote|''History of Maurice'' quoted by Tommaso Tesei<ref name="Tesei2018" />|The Babylonian race will hold the Roman state in its power for a threefold cyclic hebdomad of years. Thereafter you Romans will enslave Persians for a fifth hebdomad of years. When these very things have been accomplished, the day without evening will dwell among mortals and the expected fate will achieve power, when the forces of destruction will be handed over to dissolution and those of the better life hold sway.}}
 
A mid 7th century prophecy by Pseudo-Ephrem includes the following:
 
{{Quote|Pseudo-Ephrem quoted by Tommaso Tesei<ref name="Tesei2018" />|And the Assyrians will gain authority over the region of the Romans […] But just as the Nile, the river of Egypt recedes again from what it flooded; So too will Assyria recede back to their own country. For the Romans once again will be found in their ancestral land. Then evil will increase on the earth.}}
 
Similar prophecies occur in several 7th century Jewish works, including ''Sefer Elijah'', which links it to a prophecy in the Biblical Book of Daniel. According to common Rabbinical interpretation, the fourth and last great imperial power in that Biblical prophecy was the Byzantine empire, destined to collapse and be followed by the coming of the messiah. For Christians, a more positive interpretation had the Roman empire as that fourth power, with the Byzantines being a Christian continuation thereof as the final world power to prepare for the coming kingdom of heaven. Imperial campaigns were cast in this context as eschatalogical events of cosmic grandeur. Throughout the 6th century Byzantine emperors had propagandist policies marked by intense escatalogical inclinations. After the capture of Jerusalem in the early 7th century, propaganda was needed against Christian pessimism and Jewish eschatalogical expectations during the war.<ref>Ibid. pp. 9-13</ref> Thus, Jewish eschatalogical prophecies were of a Byzantine defeat, whereas Christian versions give them victory and a period of rule before the end.
 
Tesei also points to 'the Syriac Alexander Legend', [[Dhul-Qarnayn and the Alexander Romance|which is known to have influenced another Quranic passage]], as a famous example of such propaganda. In this legend, the Persian king's astrologers predict a final Roman victory over the Persians, and then wrongly predict that its reign will last til the end of time.<ref name="Tesei2018" /> At the time, Tesei followed the common view that the Syriac Alexander Legend was composed in 629-30 CE. Since then (in 2023), he has demonstrated and helped build a new academic consensus that it was actually composed [[Dhul-Qarnayn and the Alexander Romance|in the mid 6th century]] (with a small later interpolation shortly after Heraclius's final victory over the Sassanids in 628 CE). The prediction therein of an ultimate Roman victory goes as follows:<ref name="Tesei2023">Tommaso Tesei, ''The Syriac Legend of Alexander's Gate: Apocalypticism at the Crossroads of Byzantium and Iran'', Oxford University Press, 2024</ref>
 
{{Quote|Prophecy delived by the Persian king Tubarlaq to Alexander in the 'Syriac Alexander Legend'<ref>{{cite web|url= http://books.google.com/books/about/The_History_of_Alexander_the_Great_Being.html?id=_14LmFqhc8QC|title= The History of Alexander the Great, Being the Syriac Version of the Pseudo-Callisthenes, Volume 1|publisher= The University Press|author= Sir Ernest Alfred Wallis Budge|date= 1889|page=158|archiveurl= |deadurl=no}}</ref><ref name="Tesei2018" />|And he put down in writing with Alexander what should befall Persia, that the king and his nobles prophesied that Persia should be laid waste by the hand of the Romans, and all the kingdoms be laid waste, but that power should stand and rule to the end of time, and should deliver the kingdom of the earth to the Messiah who is to come.}}
 
Tesei is of the view that the traditional Meccan period dating of Surah al-Rum should be ignored and that the opening verses should be regarded as an ex-eventu prophecy made shortly after 628 CE i.e. revealed after the event, as was a common practice in late antique literature (and is the case with most of the above examples).<ref>Tesei 2018, p. 17</ref> He suggests that a non-political version of imperial propagandist prophecies filtered through to Muhammad from his Arab-Byzantine allies around 628, possibly influenced by monophysite Christian rejection of imperial war propaganda.<ref>Ibid. pp. 23-25</ref>
 
He also suggests that Q. 30:4, which states that "And that day the believers will rejoice", could be interpreted in terms of eschatalogical expectations that an ultimate Roman victory over the Sasanids would herald the unfolding of the final stage of sacred history, in line with the similar 7th century prophecies about the war. To support this he notes that the phrase "And on that day" (wa-yawmaʿiḏin) has eschatalogical connotations when it is used elsewhere in the Quran, as does the reference to Allah's "promise" (waʿd) in verse 6, though others have pointed out there are exceptions.
 
Adam Silverstein concurs with Tesei's assessment that the Quranic passage should be viewed in a wider, eschatalogical prophetic context of late antiquity, though draws on and emphasises more strongly the Jewish sources before the 7th century which allows time for them to have influenced the Quran during the Meccan period when the verses were traditionally revealed and may support an alternative reading of the Quranic passage in which the Romans are prophecised to be finally defeated (see the section on variant readings below; Silverstein himself argues we must remain agnostic as to which reading is correct. In this alternative reading, the rejoicing of the believers in verse 4 would be due to the downfall of the Romans rather than their victory.<ref>Adam Silverstein (2020) [https://www.academia.edu/42956572 Q 30: 2-5 in Near Eastern Context], Der Islam 97</ref>
 
====Criticisms and other views====
Tesei's article has received a number of academic criticisms, particularly by Zishan Ghaffar, as detailed below,<ref>Zishan Ghaffar, 2020, "Der Koran in seinem religions und weltgeschichtlichen Kontext", chapter: "30:2-7 – Reichseschatologische Verheißung?", pp. 167-185<BR />
See Ghaffar's English summary of his arguments in the thread surrounding [https://x.com/GhaffarZishan/status/1783821366212313561 this post on X.com] - 26 April 2024 (requires login to view)</ref> as well as from Mehdy Shaddel, who points out that known ex-eventu prophecies in late antique apocalypses have a 2-part structure: an ex-eventu prophecy (to gain the reader's trust) followed by an attempted actual apocalyptic prediction about the future, unlike the Quranic passage.<ref>[https://x.com/MayShaddel/status/1001770032760684544 X.com thread by Mehdy Shaddel - 30 May 2018 (requires login to view)</ref>
 
Ghaffar has criticised Tesei for interpreting the Quranic passage as an ex-eventu prophecy since "a few years" would be an unnecessarily vague prediction if made after the events had transpired, unlike known ex-eventu prophecies. Unlike typical apocalyptic prophecies, it also does not fortell how events will unfold up to the end time.
 
Ghaffar also rejects any suggestion that the passage is an apocalyptic prophecy since the Quran emphasises that the no-one but Allah knows the date of the end time, so would not make such a prediction. It should be noted, however (per Tesei) that Christians believed a Roman victory would commence a period of rule until the second coming i.e. not an immediate apocalypse.
 
Instead, Ghaffar innovatively interprets Q30:2-7 not as a prophecy, but rather a description of events and reassurance/invocation that the tide will turn by the help of Allah, using a formulaic phrase of invocation to Allah / Rahman seen on a number of pre-Islamic rock inscriptions.
 
Q30:5 starts with binaṣri l-lahi... (By the help of Allah... )<Br />
Q30:6 starts with waʿda l-lahi (the promise of Allah...)
 
Ghaffar argues that in those verses "The Qurʾān is using the same formula for invocations as in South Arabia: (b-nṣr w-rdʾ ʾlhn)“ (CIH 540), (b-rdʾ rḥmnn) (CIH 6), (b-nṣr w-rdʾ rḥmnn)“ (MAFRAY –Abu Ṯawr 4)."<ref>[https://x.com/GhaffarZishan/status/1783843169400201600 X.com post] - Zishan Ghaffar, 26 April 2024</ref>
 
This, he argues, recalls Byzantine propaganda as seen on an imperial coin widely issued by Heraclius after the loss of Jerusalem: Deus adiuta Romanis ("May God help the Romans").<ref>Zishan Ghaffar, 2020, p. 170.<BR />
See also this [https://x.com/GhaffarZishan/status/1783828487767503291 X.com post] - Zishan Ghaffar 26 April 2024</ref>
 
Nevertheless, the passage read as a whole is generally understood to be intended as a prophecy. While a proposed eschatalogical aspect is contested by academic scholars, it is very likely that the passage is at least meant to prophecise a conclusive victory in the Byzantine-Sasanid conflict (not merely a turning of the tide) and the timing thereof. The contemporary expectations and prophecies mentioned above were always about the conclusion of the war.
 
===Three to nine years?===
Silverstein notes that the phrase biḍ'ʿi sinīn (three to nine years) in Q. 30:4 also occurs in {{Quran|12|42}}, where it refers to the imprisonment of Joseph, which in Genesis 4:1 lasted two years. He adds, "However, the earliest Muslim exegetes (the earliest being Zayd b. ‘Alī,
ca. 740 CE), interpret the phrase as meaning either 'three to five years' or 'three to nine years'."<ref>Silverstein 2020, p. 37</ref>
 
Critics would probably question then whether the definition was changed over time to accomodate events in the Byzantine-Sasanian war, or even whether the verse could have changed through [[Naskh (Abrogation)|abrogation]] as events unfolded during Muhammad's lifetime. It is also commonly noted that, whatever the definition of biḍ'ʿi sinīn, it is somewhat vague, as though the author was unwilling to commit to a more specific predicted duration.
 
===Claim that the Byzantine victory of 622 CE fulfilled the prophecy===
Given the late antique context set out above, in which any prophecy about the Byzantine-Sasanid wars would be understood to refer to a final triumph of the Byzantines, as an important event in sacred history (perhaps with apocalyptic connotations), it is unlikely that the Quranic prophecy in verses 3-4 was intended as anything less than the ultimate triumph of the Byzantines over the Sasanids. Critics would point out that this would not in fact come until 14 years after the Byzantines lost Jerusalem to the Sasanids and not within the 3-9 years predicted in Surah al-Rum.
 
The Byzantine victory in Anatolia in 622 CE is often presented as the fulfillment of the Quranic prophecy within the required timeframe. However, that first major Roman victory marked what turned out to be a turning point in the war, after which the Byzantines became increasingly successful, culminating in the Sasanid capitulation to Heraclius which did not come until 628 CE, and the recovery of Jerusalem (lost when the Romans were defeated in the "nearest land") under the peace treaty in 629 CE.
 
The verb ghalaba which occurs repeatedly in Q. 30:2-3 means "to overcome", "conquer", "become superior"<ref>Ghalaba - [http://www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume6/00000063.pdf Lane's Lexicon] page 2279</ref> and the context of the verse suggests that it forsees a victory that ends the war.
 
===Dating the prophecy===
Some hadith narrations state that the prophecy was made after the Persians defeated the Romans (the capture of Jerusalem in 614 CE), seven years before the first Byzantine victory, which took place in 622 CE in Anatolia. However, the hadith includes a rather unlikely story about a hasty bet made by Abu Bakr which seems intended to cement the definition of the time duration specified in the verse (see for example {{Al Tirmidhi||5|44|3194}}). One of the earliest Quran commentators, Muqātil ibn Sulaymān (d. 767 CE) similarly said that the verses were revealed after the Persians invaded Palestine (i.e. 613-14 CE).
 
Interestingly, a hadith in Sunan al-Tirmidhi, one of the main six Sunni hadith collections, states that this passage was not in fact intended as a prophecy but was uttered after an unspecified Roman victory at the time of the battle of Badr. The timing is a little off (Badr is believed to have occured in 624 CE, two years after the Byzantine victory in the Anatolian campaign), but there is conceivably a kernal of history here. The hadith is graded sahih in the Dar-us-Salam edition, though is generally graded weak due to the narrator.
 
{{Quote|{{Al Tirmidhi||5|44|3192}}|Narrated 'Atiyyah:
 
Abu Sa'eed narrated: "On the Day of Badr, the Romans had a victory over the Persians. So the believers were pleased with that, then the following was revealed: 'Alif Lam Mim. The Romans have been defeated, up to His saying: 'the believers will rejoice - with the help of Allah... (30:1-5)'" He said: "So the believers were happy with the victory of the Romans over the Persians."}}
 
===Variant readings which change the meaning of the prophecy===
Tommaso Tesei, in his detailed article on the topic of this Quranic propecy, notes that the consonantal skeleton of the Quran standardised by Caliph Uthman allowed a degree of ambiguity when reading the text due to the lack of diacritical marks. Variant readings mentioned by Islamic scholars and set out in Tesei's article included the opposite meaning to the standard reading. In this alternative reading, the passage would most likely by a prophecy that the Byzantine Christians would eventually be defeated by Muhammad's followers rather than being about the war with the Sasanids (the verses do not specify who the Romans are fighting).<ref name="Tesei2018" />
 
'''Standard reading:''' ġulibat al-Rūm … sa-yaġlibūna, “the Romans have been vanquished … they will vanquish”;
 
'''Alternative reading:''' ġalabat al-Rūm … sa-yuġlabūna, “the Romans have vanquished … they will be vanquished”
 
In other words, without short vowel marks, which [[Diacritical Marks of the Qur'an|were not written in Quranic manuscripts until the 8th century]] the verb ghalaba غلب could be vocalised as victorious غَلَبَ or defeated غُلِبَ .
 
Nevertheless, Tesei argues that the standard reading is the most likely to be original, not least given its resemblance to other prophecies circulating in the 7th century middle east in which the Byzantines are ultimately victorious after defeat to the Persians. Similarly, Professor Sean Anthony has argued in favour of the standard reading and against the alternative readings, which are recorded by scholars from at least the 8th century CE though not attested in early manuscripts which are either ambiguous or contain the standard reading.<ref>[https://twitter.com/shahanSean/status/1282861742943604737 Twitter.com thread] by Professor Sean Anthony - 14 July 2020 ([https://web.archive.org/web/20200714022110/https://twitter.com/shahanSean/status/1282861742943604737 archive])</ref>
 
===Nearest or lowest land?===
Sometimes it is claimed that adnā l-arḍi in verse 3 should be interpreted in verse 30:3 to mean "the lowest land" rather than "the nearest land" (adnā is from the same root as the word dun'yā and is primarily defined as "nearest"; it could also mean "lowest" in the moral sense of ignoble, base, vile, mean or weak, though probably was not used in the sense of low elevation.<ref>Dal-nun-waw - [http://www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume3/00000087.pdf Lane's Lexicon page 921] and [http://www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume3/00000088.pdf 922]</ref>). By this interpretation the Quran is claimed to have miraculously revealed that the Dead Sea in modern Israel was the lowest point on earth, a fact not known by humans until modern times. Besides the very questionable linguistic interpretation, the main problem with this miracle claim is that the Byzantines did not fight the Persians beside the Dead Sea, which is part of the Jordan rift valley, but rather they beseiged and [[w:Byzantine–Sasanian War of 602–628|captured Jerusalem in 614 CE]], which is well above sea level.
 
==Gog and Magog - Quran 18:93-101 and 21:96==
{{Main|Dhul-Qarnayn and the Alexander Romance}}
 
{{Quote|{{Quran-range|18|93|101}}|Until, when he reached [a pass] between two mountains, he found beside them a people who could hardly understand [his] speech.
They said, "O Dhul-Qarnayn, indeed Gog and Magog are [great] corrupters in the land. So may we assign for you an expenditure that you might make between us and them a barrier?"
He said, "That in which my Lord has established me is better [than what you offer], but assist me with strength; I will make between you and them a dam.
Bring me sheets of iron" - until, when he had leveled [them] between the two mountain walls, he said, "Blow [with bellows]," until when he had made it [like] fire, he said, "Bring me, that I may pour over it molten copper."
So Gog and Magog were unable to pass over it, nor were they able [to effect] in it any penetration.
[Dhul-Qarnayn] said, "This is a mercy from my Lord; but when the promise of my Lord comes, He will make it level, and ever is the promise of my Lord true."
And We will leave them that day surging over each other, and [then] the Horn will be blown, and We will assemble them in [one] assembly.
And We will present Hell that Day to the Disbelievers, on display -
Those whose eyes had been within a cover [removed] from My remembrance, and they were not able to hear.}}
 
{{Quote|{{Quran|21|96}}|Until when [the dam of] Gog and Magog has been opened and they, from every elevation, descend}}
 
Gog and Magog are mythical barbarian tribes with an eschatalogical role described in the New Testament book of revelation. The first century CE historian Josephus recorded that Magog was shut behind an iron wall built between mountains by Alexander the Great. In late antiquity, legends continued to develop in which they would break free and overun the earth in the last days, as seen in the ''Syriac Alexander Legend'' and its 7th century derivatives (see [[Dhul-Qarnayn and the Alexander Romance]]). The earth was envisioned to be flat and largely unexplored in these legends, [[Islamic Views on the Shape of the Earth|as also in the Quran]], so it would be easy to imagine these tribes being walled off behind the world encircling mountains with no way around.
 
From a modern perspective, there is no way that any mountain range could seal off world-threatening tribes for millenia, without any trace of them or the mythical iron and brass wall being discovered.
 
==Judgement day would be close to Muhammad's time==
The idea of judgment day being imminent was a common belief in late antiquity, with many prominent Christian, Jewish and Zoroastrian writings preaching the eschaton (the purposeful end of the world as part of God's divine plan for judgement day) was about to happen, which continued in early Islam.<ref>For examples of sudden end times being promised due to political movements in Christian, Jewish and Zoroastrianism literature in the centuries preceding Islam, see Shoemaker, Stephen J. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv16t6jmh. ''The Apocalypse of Empire: Imperial Eschatology in Late Antiquity and Early Islam.''] University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018. Chapters 1 - 4 And for early Islam, see chapters 5 and 6.</ref> Although not a consensus belief, many academic scholars have argued Muhammad preached this belief in the Qur'an.<ref>Ibid. pp. 124-132</ref>{{Quote|{{Quran|54|1}}|<b>The Hour has drawn near</b> and the moon is split.}}(Cf: {{Quran|21|1}} and {{Quran|70|6-7}}. And see also e.g. {{Quran|40|18}} and {{Quran|53|57}} where its imminence/closeness is implied in the words ''azifati / āzifat.''<ref>Lane's Lexicon Quranic Research [https://lexicon.quranic-research.net/data/01_A/067_Azf.html for root ازف] Lane's Lexicon Classical Arabic Dictionary [https://lexicon.quranic-research.net/pdf/Page_0053.pdf أَزِفَتِ / (ءَازِفَة Book 1. pp 53.]</ref>)
 
Some take {{Quran|54|1}} as a future prediction of a sign of judgment day, however Neuwirth (2024) notes the issue with interpreting this as a future event is not based on the Qur'an's words but later traditions.<ref>Neuwirth, Angelika. ''The Qur'an: Text and Commentary, Volume 2.1: Early Middle Meccan Suras: The New Elect (pp. 57-58).'' Yale University Press. Kindle Edition.</ref> Alongside the [[Scientific Errors in the Quran#Moon%20split%20in%20two|moon splitting in this verse]], which given the dubious scientific issues and lack of sightings from anywhere else in the world, modern academics have noted was most likely referring to a celestial phenomenon like a lunar eclipse,<ref>Ibid. pp. 56 - 57 (Citing Uri Rubin who suggests a partial lunar eclipse, who also notes Rudi Paret came to the same conclusion in ''“Muhammad’s message in Mecca: warnings, signs, and miracles" [The case of the splitting of the moon (Q 54:1-2)].'' in Jonathan E. Brockopp, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Muhammad (Cambridge, 2010), 39-60. Uri Rubin. Rudi Paret's opinion is noted in footnote 9 pp. 44.</ref> given as a sign of the hour close to happening, which the Meccans rejected due to it seemingly being unrelated to Muhammad.<ref>Ibid. pp. 57</ref>
 
The hour's non-arrival seemed to be a repeated source of contention with his audience, with opponents regularly questioning when it would arrive, and questioning why the punishment that was promised to them has not yet come.<ref>Shoemaker, Stephen J.. ''The Death of a Prophet (Divinations: Rereading Late Ancient Religion) (p. 161-163).'' University of Pennsylvania Press, Inc.. Kindle Edition. (For example Q79:42, and he is told to hasten it in Q29:53, cf: Q11:8, and questioned as why the punishment promised to them hasn't come in Q7:70, 77; Q10:48; Q13:6; Q21:38; Q22:47; Q46:22).</ref> Though one might point out there may appear to be tension with the creation of a law-giving prophet and community building in the Medinan Qur'an, Shoemaker and Cook point out those preaching the end of the world often also preached living righteously until the hour arrived.<ref>Ibid. pp. 159</ref>
 
Alongside the plain meaning of the text, there is ample evidence this belief was held by many early Muslims too, including very early canonical and sahih rated hadith (''see: [[Scientific Errors in the Hadith#Failed%20eschatological%20predictions|failed eschatological predictions in the hadith]]'') with more cited by Shoemaker.<ref>Shoemaker, Stephen J. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv16t6jmh. ''The Apocalypse of Empire: Imperial Eschatology in Late Antiquity and Early Islam.''] University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018. pp. 131-132 & pp. 142-144</ref> There are also many other non-canonical but early (within the first century of Islam) traditions stating the end of the eschaton would occur within Muhammad's lifetime or shortly after,<ref>Shoemaker, Stephen J.. ''The Death of a Prophet (p. 174-178).'' Kindle Edition.</ref> in other sources such biographical 'seerah' material<ref>Ibid. & Shoemaker, Stephen J. 2018. ''The Apocalypse of Empire: Imperial Eschatology in Late Antiquity and Early Islam. pp. 142-144.''</ref> Later Islamic scholars like al-Tabari would often use metaphorical interpretations of these to reconcile the continued passage of time by pushing the predicted end date into the future.<ref>Shoemaker, Stephen J. 2018. ''The Death of a Prophet (p. 173-174).'' Kindle Edition. [Note the following numerical symbolism interpretation of the eschatological hadith are also false predictions as this would move judgment day to no later than ~1,132AD (As 500 years after Muhammad's death being traditionally recorded in 632AD)] "Perhaps the most famous effort to reconcile the two fingers tradition with the Hour’s delay occurs at the beginning of al-Ṭabarī’s History, where he rather cleverly deploys this tradition in order to place his work within an extended version of Islam’s eschatological calendar.<sup>231</sup> This he achieves by transforming these eschatological warnings of imminent doom into an orderly model of historical periodization that frames his historical narrative. ''Al-Ṭabarī here concludes that since the index finger is one-fourteenth shorter than the middle finger, and the total length of the world’s existence is known to be seven thousand years, Muhammad clearly meant to signal that the Hour would arrive five hundred years after him, thus leaving another two hundred years or so beyond al-Ṭabarī before the world would come to an end.'' In the same context, al-Ṭabarī also identifies a second eschatological tradition that he employs to similar effect. According to this report, Muhammad once addressed his followers at a time “when the sun had almost set and only a small sliver of it remained visible,” and he explained to them that “as compared to what remains of our world, that which has passed is like what remains of this day as compared to what has passed of it, and you will see only a little (more) of the sun.”<sup>232</sup> The eschatological immediacy of this ḥadīth is rather clear, and once again it seems quite unlikely that such a prediction would have been ascribed to Muhammad very long after his death. ''Yet here al-Ṭabarī deploys a similar hermeneutic strategy that enables him again to push the Hour into the future. When Muhammad spoke these words, according to al-Ṭabarī, the day was half past, and since a day with God is as a thousand years, the Hour’s advent could be expected five hundred years after the time when Muhammad spoke. In this way, what was presumably a very early expression of Islamic belief in the Hour’s immediacy could be reconciled with the centuries that had elapsed between Muhammad’s warnings and al-Ṭabarī himself.'' By reinterpreting the tradition’s “small sliver” of the sun as somehow the equivalent of midday, al-Ṭabarī postpones the Hour into a distant future."</ref>
 
However others scholars have disputed the idea such as Dr Zishan Ghaffar, who states that the Qur'an takes an agnostic stance on when the eschaton will occur, noting many verses claiming the knowledge belongs to God and that Muhammad is not told when it will occur.<ref>See the full arguments and discussion here: ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7XWxCc64dI The Qur'an and the End of the World] - Dr Zishan Ghaffar'' - Youtube Video on Gabriel Said Reynolds' Academic Channel [https://www.youtube.com/c/ExploringtheQuranandtheBible Exploring the Quran and the Bible]</ref>
{{Quote|{{Quran|7|187-188}}|"They ask you, [O Muhammad], about the Hour: when is its arrival? Say, 'Its knowledge is only with my Lord. None will reveal its time except Him.'"
"Say, 'I hold not for myself (the power of) benefit or harm, except what Allah has willed. And if I knew the unseen, I would have acquired much wealth, and no harm would have touched me. I am not except a Warner and a bringer of good tidings to a people who believe.'"}}
Cf: {{Quran|31|34}}
 
Sinai (2017) notes that stating the end is said to be 'nigh' while not specifying exactly when (or trying to foretell specific pre-judgment day historical signs to mark it is close) is not contradictory, and has been seen in other late antique Christian writings.<ref>– “The Eschatological Kerygma of the Early Qur’an”, in ''Apocalypticism and Eschatology in Late Antiquity: Encounters in the Abrahamic Religions, 6th–8th Centuries'', edited by Hagit Amirav, Emmanouela Grypeou, and Guy Stroumsa, Leuven: Peeters, 2017, 219–266. ''pp.24-25''
 
What the early Qur’an is primarily interested in, then, is not in foretelling when and under which historical circumstances the world will come to an end. Rather, it is concerned to confront its hearers, through the artful deployment of a whole range of literary techniques, with the Judgement they will ultimately have to face and to convince them that this basic fact necessitates a fundamental makeover of the way they live and act. I take it that it is primarily to inculcate such an eschatologically tinged outlook on the world that several Qur’anic verses make the dramatic announcement that the Day of Judgement is, or has drawn, “nigh” (see Q 70:6–7 as well as 54:1, and, even later, 21:1).<sup>74</sup> At the same time, already the early Qur’an insists that only God, not Muhammad, knows when the end will arrive (Q 79:42–46). As indicated by the opening verse of this latter passage (Q 79:42: “They ask you about the Hour: When is the time of its anchoring?”; cf. also 75:6 and 51:12), the Qur’an’s insistence that it is not part of Muhammad’s mandate to predict the time of the end responds to pressing queries by some of his hearers to be told when exactly the Hour would occur.<sup>75</sup> That such agnosticism about the exact time of the end was not necessarily seen as incompatible with announcements of eschatological imminence is confirmed by a sermon of Jacob of Serugh, which advances a very similar combination of claims.<sup>76</sup></ref>
 
==The day of resurrection==
A large portion of the prophetic character of the Quran involves eschatalogical events around the last day. It describes a loud trumpet-like blast, the earth and mountains being lifted and the mountains pulverised, the heavens being split and rolled up, and so on.
 
===The heaven will be split and rolled up like scroll===
Many verses clearly convey a cosmography in which the sky has a two dimensional structure as a layered dome or flat layers (for detailed discussion and the views of academic scholars, see [[Cosmology of the Quran]]). On the last day it says the heavens will be split, rent asunder, with angels appearing at its edges.
 
These heavens are like roofs (saqf {{Quran|21|32}}, {{Quran|52|5}}), a building/edifice/tent (binaan {{Quran|2|22}}, {{Quran|40|64}}), a ceiling (samk {{Quran|79|28}}), in layers ({{Quran|71|15}} and {{Quran|67|3}}), while {{Quran|13|2}} further emphasizes this image by pointing out that, unlike what one would expect with an Arabian tent, the roof that is the sky is without visible pillars (perhaps phrased with deliberate ambiguity). Reinforcing the 2 dimensional imagery, {{Quran|81|11}} adds that the sky is like a covering that can be 'stripped away', while {{Quran|21|104}} states that it will eventually be rolled or folded up like a parchment and {{Quran|39|67}} says that the heavens will then be held in Allah's hand. This will occur after it has been slit (furijat {{Quran|77|9}}), rent asunder with clouds ({{Quran|25|25}}), split (inshaqqat {{Quran|55|37}}, {{Quran|84|1}}, {{Quran|69|16}} with angels appearing at its edges {{Quran|69|17}}).
The heaven will become as gateways ({{Quran|78|19}}, a possibility also alluded to in {{Quran-range|15|13|15}}).
 
{{Quote|{{Quran|2|22}}|[He] who made for you the earth a bed [spread out] and the sky a ceiling and sent down from the sky, rain and brought forth thereby fruits as provision for you. So do not attribute to Allah equals while you know [that there is nothing similar to Him].}}
 
{{Quote|{{Quran|71|15}}|Do you not consider how Allah has created seven heavens in layers}}
 
{{Quote|{{Quran|78|12}}|And We have built above you seven strong (heavens)}}
 
{{Quote|{{Quran|13|2}}|
Allah is He Who raised the heavens without any pillars that ye can see}}
 
{{Quote|{{Quran|81|11}}|
And when the sky is stripped away}}
 
{{Quote|{{Quran|21|104}}|The Day when We will fold the heaven like the folding of a [written] sheet for the records. As We began the first creation, We will repeat it. [That is] a promise binding upon Us. Indeed, We will do it.}}
 
{{Quote|{{Quran|39|67}}|They have not appraised Allah with true appraisal, while the earth entirely will be [within] His grip on the Day of Resurrection, and the heavens will be folded in His right hand. Exalted is He and high above what they associate with Him.}}
 
{{Quote|{{Quran|25|25}}|The Day the heaven shall be rent asunder with clouds, and angels shall be sent down, descending (in ranks),-}}
 
{{Quote|{{Quran-range|69|15|17}}|Then on that Day, the Resurrection will occur, And the heaven will split [open], for that Day it is infirm. And the angels are at its edges. And there will bear the Throne of your Lord above them, that Day, eight [of them].}}
 
===Contradictory prophecies regarding the last day and punishment of disbelievers===
{{Main|Contradictions in the Quran}}
 
The Quran describes frequently the fate of disbelievers when it claims they will be brought to judgement before Allah on the last day. Critics have noticed that in some cases these prophecies are contradictory.
 
For example, a few verses claim that they will be unable to speak in their defence.
 
{{Quote|{{Quran|27|85}}|
And the Word will be fulfilled against them, because of their wrong-doing, and they will be unable to speak}}
 
{{Quote|{{Quran-range|77|34|38}}|Woe, that Day, to the deniers. This is a Day they will not speak, Nor will it be permitted for them to make an excuse. Woe, that Day, to the deniers. This is the Day of Judgement; We will have assembled you and the former peoples.}}
 
Another verse states that their body parts will bear witness of what they did.
 
{{Quote|{{Quran|36|65}}|
That Day shall We set a seal on their mouths. But their hands will speak to us, and their feet bear witness, to all that they did. }}
 
However, various other verses state that they will be able to lie about their past conduct and describe dialogue taking place between disbelievers and believers or with Allah or angels on the day of resurrection. For example:
 
{{Quote|{{Quran-range|6|22|24}}|And [mention, O Muhammad], the Day We will gather them all together; then We will say to those who associated others with Allah, "Where are your 'partners' that you used to claim [with Him]?" Then there will be no [excuse upon] examination except they will say, "By Allah, our Lord, we were not those who associated." See how they will lie about themselves. And lost from them will be what they used to invent.}}
 
{{Quote|{{Quran-range|37|20|28}}|They will say, "O woe to us! This is the Day of Recompense." [They will be told], "This is the Day of Judgement which you used to deny." [The angels will be ordered], "Gather those who committed wrong, their kinds, and what they used to worship Other than Allah, and guide them to the path of Hellfire And stop them; indeed, they are to be questioned." [They will be asked], "What is [wrong] with you? Why do you not help each other?" But they, that Day, are in surrender. And they will approach one another blaming each other. They will say, "Indeed, you used to come at us from the right."}}
 
Another contradiction involves whether or not the disbelievers will be raised blind on the day of resurrection. The following verse clearly states that they will be blind:
 
{{Quote|{{Quran-range|20|124|125}}|And whoever turns away from My remembrance - indeed, he will have a depressed life, and We will gather him on the Day of Resurrection blind." He will say, "My Lord, why have you raised me blind while I was [once] seeing?"}}
 
Other verses, however, state that they will see and observe what is happening on that day.
 
{{Quote|{{Quran|16|76}}|And when those who associated others with Allah see their "partners," they will say," Our Lord, these are our partners [to You] whom we used to invoke besides You." But they will throw at them the statement, "Indeed, you are liars."}}
 
{{Quote|{{Quran-range|37|16|20}}|When we have died and become dust and bones, are we indeed to be resurrected? And our forefathers [as well]?" Say, "Yes, and you will be [rendered] contemptible." It will be only one shout, and at once they will be observing. They will say, "O woe to us! This is the Day of Recompense."}}
 
Regarding the food of the disbelievers, the Quran also gives contradictory claims. They are variously described as being exclusively fed thorns (''dhari''), pus from wounds, or a hell fruit (''zaqqum''; see also in {{Quran-range|44|40|46}} and {{Quran-range|56|41|52}})
 
{{Quote|{{Quran|88|6}}|
"No food will there be for them but a bitter Dhari"}}
 
{{Quote|{{Quran|69|36}}|
Nor hath he any food except the corruption from the washing of wounds}}
 
{{Quote|{{Quran|37|62|66}}|
Is Paradise a better accommodation or the tree of zaqqum? Indeed, We have made it a torment for the wrongdoers. Indeed, it is a tree issuing from the bottom of the Hellfire, Its emerging fruit as if it was heads of the devils. And indeed, they will eat from it and fill with it their bellies.}}
 
Regarding these verses and others, see the article [[Contradictions in the Quran]].
 
==Other prophecies==
===Preservation of the Quran===
{{Main|Textual History of the Quran}}
{{Quran|15|9}} states "Indeed, it is We who sent down the Qur'an and indeed, We will be its guardian." This has been taken as Allah's assurance that the Quran is safe from corruption. The exact interpretation varied and became stricter over time. A common notion today is that the book is preserved from the original, letter for letter, dot for dot. Such notions have faced challenges both due to modern academic work and the Islamic tradition itself. See the main article for detailed information.
 
===Abu Lahab's fate===
Surah 111, al-Masad, consists of five verses ({{Quran-range|111|1|5}}) condemning a man it calls Abu Lahab ("Father of the flame") and his wife to hell. According to tradition, Abu Lahab died some years later, still in disbelief.
 
It is often claimed in apologetics discourse that Abu Lahab could have destroyed the credibility of Muhammad and the Quran by converting or pretending to do so after the surah had been revealed. This notion that the prophecy was falsifiable has faced two main criticisms: Firstly, the surah does not state that Abu Lahab will never believe, but only that he is destined to be plunged into hell when he dies, which is unfalsifiable. If instead it is interpreted as a prophecy about Abu Lahab's continuing non-belief, critics argue it was self-fulfilling the moment it was made. He could not credibly come to believe in a book which prophecises that he will not do so.


Some apologists will even go so far as to say that ''all ''tafsir are 'out of date' and their explanations of the Qur'an are no longer valid. This would then give them license to interpret the Qur'an in any way they see fit; including presenting evidence of "fulfilled prophecy".
==See Also==
==See Also==
*[[Muhammad's prophecies]]
*[[Muhammad's prophecies]]
*[[Scientific Miracles in the Quran]]
*[[Scientific Miracles in the Quran]]
*[[Islam and Miracles]]
*[[Islam and Miracles]]
==References==
{{Reflist|30em}}


[[Category:Miracles]]
[[Category:Miracles]]
[[Category:Prophecies]]
[[Category:Prophecies]]
[[Category:Qur'an]]
[[Category:Qur'an]]
[[Category:Qadr (fate)]]
[[Category:Eschatology]]
[[Category:Revelation]]
Lightyears
Editors, em-bypass-2, Reviewers, rollback, Administrators
3,454

edits

Retrieved from "http://wikiislamica.net/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/128879...140383"