48,466
edits
The Quran and Mountains: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Introduction
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
m (→See Also) |
m (→Introduction) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
Many skeptics have already refuted the claim that the Qur'an is validated by the geological science about mountains. This article adds to this by addressing several new points that apologists are adopting to | Many skeptics have already refuted the claim that the Qur'an is validated by the geological science about mountains. This article adds to this by addressing several new points that [[apologists]] are adopting to justify their claim or to squirm from the scientific facts provided to them. | ||
Due to | Due to the Qur'an not being very ‘clear and easy to understand’ and what some refer to as the ‘richness of the [[Arabic]] language,’ [[apologists]] have been able to use the vague interpretations of several Qur'anic verses in their attempt to prove the scientific validity of the Qur'an. In this, they are backed by a Muslim geologist specializing in biostratification, Professor Zaghloul Raghib El Naggar, and a western surgeon, [[Dr.]] Maurice Bucaille. | ||
==The Apologists' Debating Technique== | ==The Apologists' Debating Technique== | ||