48,466
edits
The Quran and Mountains: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Analysis
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
m (→Discussion) |
m (→Analysis) |
||
| Line 211: | Line 211: | ||
Therefore it appears likely that they are mistaken when claiming | Therefore it appears likely that they are mistaken when claiming mountains are pegs in the literal sense. They base their claims on a single, greatly exaggerated, schematic diagram and not from a more comprehensive survey of mountain types and genuine geological data. | ||
For these reasons, | For these reasons, it can be conceded that mountains are pegs only in the metaphorical sense, but definitely not in the literal sense. | ||
They also seem incredulous that Muhammad should have known that mountains have 'roots', arguing that since the bulk of the mountain is below ground it is unobservable. Muhammad could only have referred to mountain roots (like pegs) from a divine source. However, this may not be true since ancient people already knew mountains have roots. For example, the ancient Hebrews seemed to have acquired this knowledge. | They also seem incredulous that Muhammad should have known that mountains have 'roots', arguing that since the bulk of the mountain is below ground it is unobservable. Muhammad could only have referred to mountain roots (like pegs) from a divine source. However, this may not be true since ancient people already knew mountains have roots. For example, the ancient Hebrews seemed to have acquired this knowledge. | ||