48,466
edits
User talk:Sahab: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Qur'an 86:7 article (and rationale for certain Article Style and Content guidelines)
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 249: | Line 249: | ||
:::::::::::::Now go ahead?[[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 08:25, 30 March 2014 (PDT) | :::::::::::::Now go ahead?[[User:Saggy|Saggy]] ([[User talk:Saggy|talk]]) 08:25, 30 March 2014 (PDT) | ||
::::::::::::::I'll take a proper look at when I can. [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 18:55, 30 March 2014 (PDT) | ::::::::::::::I'll take a proper look at when I can. [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 18:55, 30 March 2014 (PDT) | ||
:::::::::::::::I've had a look at it, and your response doesn't make sense, or at least it is not worded clearly enough for it to be apparent. You mention that Yusuf Ali "does not explain what he means by seed: Sperm, semen, ovum or zygote". But then fail to expand on that by explaining how or why it matters. Then you say "But he does not say what a rib is, metaphorically." However, Yusuf Ali is not claiming the rib is anything metaphorically. I don't think we even need to respond to Yusuf Ali's metaphor claim, but if we do it, then the response should be clear and decisive. I don't think this is either. You can ask Axius to comment here if you want a second opinion. [[User:Sahab|--Sahab]] ([[User talk:Sahab|talk]]) 10:58, 31 March 2014 (PDT) | |||
== Womb sentence == | == Womb sentence == | ||